Jump to content
  • Sign Up
Sign Up To Remove Ads! | Purchase An Ad Slot!
Sign in to follow this  
Cinnamon

Tranceformation of America/ Cathy O'Brien and Mark Phillips

Recommended Posts

https://www.freeyourmindaz.com/uploads/1/2/8/3/12830241/trance-formation-of-america-cathy-o-brien.pdf

There is a sexually explicit warning on this. It's been speculated that Mark Phillips was just another handler of O'Brien. There are lots of writings online about all of this if you dig.  

The names in this book line up with what has been suspected of the global elite pedo rings.  It includes dictators, American politicians and some of them are still alive today.  It's one of the first things I found when I started looking at CTs. Take it for what it's worth. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I said in another thread that Cathy O'Brien was debunked ages ago.
Unfortunately the last time I considered her book in any depth was in the 90's
so I can't remember a lot.


Before anyone is inclined to believe her story, which is simliar to the early career
of David Icke (he's not as bad recently) - just go to her wikipedia page, it's a starting point
or look up as much about it as you can. First, consider her book was written at a time
when the satanic ritual abuse scare was still in high mode, CT theory was taking off in
X-Files and Area 51, talk about real CIA programs was not thoroughly understood, and
many flimsy stories received  attention. Such as Philadelphia Experiment (not that it didn't happen,
but that they didn't make the USS Eldritch disappear and time travel, and sailors didn't materialize
in metal and die..), Al Bielik "Montauk Project", Phil Schneider, Andrew Basagio, Laura
Eisenhower, Bob Lazar, John Lear, you get the picture.


Anyway Cathy's assertions, unlike plausible ones, are so over-the-top about real famous people,
without even a single shred of evidence for anything she wrote, there is literally no reason at all
to believe anything in the book. The book was not published by any reputable publisher, even
the name "Reality Marketing LLC" should tell you something. Whatever her or her husband's
motives for writing what can only be called "conspiracy porn",  It was the only book they wrote
and all attempts at getting her to back up any of her story failed. I came to the conclusion
it was done for money, and people who are unable to distinguish possible fact from fiction
are still buying the book. Most of the best arguments against her book are probably not
on the internet anymore, as 20 years has poofed a lot of websites. I'm not saying there was
no MK-ULTRA. I'm saying they used the lack of much particular information regarding it
as a platform to exploit - a blank canvas upon which an imaginative story presented
as truth could be imagined. I'm not even saying she wasn't sexually abused. It's quite
possible she suffers from a mental disorder.


By definition, something that has no evidence at all, does not even warrant a debunk.
It's like saying, go ahead and debunk Paul Bunyan. How do you know Paul Bunyan didn't exist?
It's also important to note their targets. For example: ""Pastor" Moore combined his knowledge of Kelly’s and my programming keys, codes, and triggers with his use of metaphorical language to maintain and/or direct our mode of operation. Moore’s "following" consisted primarily of government mind-controlled slaves and handlers, including the Mandrells, Jack Greene and his slave, the Oak Ridge Boys, and others. He instructed us on how to vote, which political issues to support, and to follow other "religious" political leaders such as his and Manuel Noriega’s friend, evangelist Jimmy Swaggart. "Religious counseling" from Moore equated to maintaining mind-control programming through "God’s Orders". And "God’s Orders" often came by telephone."


Please no replies, I do not wish to get into a large discussion about this subject.
Usually when a fringe topic like this from many years ago is resurfaced, if it's something
such as in this case that I dismissed over 20 years ago, time is not well spent rediscovering
why I came to that conclusion... it's just not worth it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, snowball said:

Please no replies, I do not wish to get into a large discussion about this subject.

Really. You put up a bunch of stuff and want no replies? OK then. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, snowball said:

Please no replies, I do not wish to get into a large discussion about this subject.

"Please no replies" means in some way that you don't want to hear that other people disagree with you.

But I have to tell you: I disagree with you -- please no replies, I'm not interested in a discussion with you about this subject. Just in case someone wants to know: I've read both books years ago. There are other methods to check the credibility of a story.

I'm not interested in comments like "there is literally no reason at all to believe anything in the book." because I'm using my own judgement.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, roamer said:

"Please no replies" means in some way that you don't want to hear that other people disagree with you.

But I have to tell you: I disagree with you -- please no replies, I'm not interested in a discussion with you about this subject. Just in case someone wants to know: I've read both books years ago. There are other methods to check the credibility of a story.

I'm not interested in comments like "there is literally no reason at all to believe anything in the book." because I'm using my own judgement.

 

My apologies to you and Cinammon, feel free to discuss the merits or shortcomings
of their book, of course. My opinion is not going to change. She and her husband
concocted the stories.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.