Jump to content
  • Sign Up


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies. Want this topic removed from the archive?

The Modern Gnostic

The Occult Roots Of NASA And The Ongoing Fraud: Part 3

Recommended Posts

Didn't forget about you Grav....The Modern Gnostic


Space Travel Is Impossible Because There Is No “Space”

By The Modern Gnostic


A Quick Recap Of Parts 1 & 2

In part one of the series I provided five cases of egregious fraud that completely invalidates NASA as a credible agency and instead is a purveyor of pseudoscience  and Lysenkoism. Lysenkoism is used metaphorically to describe the manipulation or distortion of the scientific process as a way to reach a predetermined conclusion as dictated by an ideological bias, often related to social or political objectives. The American taxpayer derives virtually no benefit from NASA’S existence and alleged scientific contributions derived by supposed explorations and experiments in space.

Absent of any other sources to verify, we have had to prostate ourselves to the so-called “experts” despite irrefutable evidence that NASA is nothing more than an elaborate financial embezzler and pseudoscience peddler. In Part 1 we established a bar of credibility stating that “Fraud Vitiates Everything”


In short, once fraud is detected everything that sits upon it is now in question. Your credibility is shot! Who would disagree with the logic of found fraud destroys the validity of everything? It’s reasonable, predictable and has the power to instantly change the direction of one’s perception, even those that were held sacred. Fraud has no limits by those who engage in it and it’s been around a long time. Do you think real fraudsters stop at just one fraud? Or do you think they keep going and going until they die or get caught? The answer is a simple one. Why would you ever stop lucrative fraudulent activity if you haven’t been caught? So the chance for systemic fraud once initial fraud is found becomes a virtual certainty.

If you haven’t read Parts 1 & 2  I would suggest it in order to better understand the context of this article and contents therein. At the end of part 1 we had five rock solid cases of blatant fraud and after part 2 the list has grown to 15. That is a 300% increase in secondary fraud or the second level. At each new level the fraud spreads exponentially eventually diluting the “root fraud”.


NASA’s 5 undeniable frauds Part 1:

1. The Occult and Satanic roots of NASA

2. The Apollo Moon Landing Hoax

3. The 1986 Challenger Disaster Hoax

4. The International Space Station Hoax

5. The ongoing involvement and manipulation by Freemasons

NASA’s 10 undeniable frauds Part 2:

6. Satellites Exist Hoax

7. Satellite Deployment/Launching Hoaxes

8. Hubble Telescope Hoax

9. Hubble Image Hoaxes

10. The Space Shuttle Hoax

11. Sky Lab Hoax

12. Earth Images Hoax no actual unaltered images exist!

13. Apollo 11 imagery and telemetry lost by NASA in 2007  hoax (they have possession or destroyed?)

14. Earth has changed to an Oblate Spheroid, no longer round like a billiard ball

15. All NASA patents and licenses are now potentially fraudulent

*some items on both lists may be a secondary hoax originating from a primary hoax. example: If satellites don’t exist how can Hubble? If Hubble doesn’t exist how can the images exist? The hoaxes build-up like sedimentary rock, the next layer covers over the previous layer. In “Fraud Vitiates Everything” the discovery of initial fraud/hoax must invalidate all claims, statements, proofs, references, abstracts, etc., that utilize any or all parts of the primary hoax as a basis for the secondary fraud/hoax and so on.

In addition to “Fraud Vitiates Everything” we will use Occam’s Razor to separate science from science fiction.

(The Aristotelian principle that entities must not be multiplied beyond what is necessary. This principle became known as Occam’s (or Ockham’s) Razor or the law of parsimony.  In science, the simplest theory that fits the facts of a problem is the one that should be selected)

By recognizing the root fraud of NASA, it isn’t even necessary to offer alternative proofs to refute NASA’s claims of human space travel since they cannot account for the fraud that has already been found. NASA can throw all the equations, images, videos and technical doublespeak in support of their space travel fairy tale, but until NASA overcomes the overwhelming evidence of root fraud what’s to talk about?  Well, lets take a few potshots’ at NASA anyway since they’ve been lying to us since 1958.

That being said, I thought it would be appropriate to give you a current sampling of “activities” NASA has been engaged in while under the direct auspices of the military industrial complex. Many people forget that NASA is under the military command and not a government agency like the CDC, IRS, or FDA. (what a fine trio) Would it piss you off if you found out that many NASA employees were caught watching child pornography ? I would be pissed! Would it piss you off if you found out that NASA was changing the data on the Greenland Icesheets to perpetuate the global warming scam? I would be pissed!Would it piss you off if you found out that NASA has been involved in geoengineering and spraying Lithium into the atmosphere? I would be really pissed!


Funny, we can send out probes to the edges of our solar system but somehow we can’t figure out a way to end starvation and famine. How is this possible!! Or maybe better said “why is this even happening?”  The answer is The Rothschild Khazarian Mafia (RKM) backed by the Jesuits (to be discussed in further detail in part 4). NASA is one of the main pillars the satanic khazarians use to control humanity. With their Freemason minions at the helm, it’s been a tool of spiritual oppression, pseudoscience garbage wrapped up in a massive embezzling scheme. The hoaxes below bring truth to the previous sentence.


By assigning numbers to the hoaxes it’s easy to dispel all of NASA’s amazing accomplishments. For example, #2, #4 #10 & #11 are proven hoaxes which amazingly are the only 4 proofs NASA has used to chronicle actual human space travel. Let that sink-in for a moment. The Apollo Missions, International Space Station/Shuttle, Hubble and Sky Lab have been thoroughly exposed as elaborate hoaxes by the Freemason’s of NASA which leaves zero proof of humans and space travel.

NASA has laid out their pseudoscience lies like dominoes, one-flick can drop the whole lot. Imagine a “block” representing one NASA hoax. By snapping together other blocks of NASA hoaxes you eventually have a fortified matrix of hoaxes which is moderated solely by NASA. It eventually becomes a labyrinth of bullcrap so thick you need machete to cut through it.


One unusual aspect of NASA’s fraud is a combination of deductive and inductive reasoning can be used to expose NASA as a fraudulent Masonic/Military/Hollywood propaganda apparatus.  We can arrive at a confirmation starting with a theory, such as “NASA is a fraud”. Hypothesize “satellites aren’t real?” Observe the information, for example “why are there bubbles seen on space walks?” and then confirm that satellites are fake.


 Likewise I haveinformation such as “NASA is run by the Freemasons”, I observe the information and see a pattern like “constant masonic symbolism and gestures”  I can then make atentative hypothesis for example “NASA could be run by masonic satanists”  I can then observe more information like “the founders of NASA were all occultists” and now I can confirm the original information “NASA is run by Freemasons”

The ability to incorporate deductive and inductive reasoning to arrive at confirmation is a testament to the massive body of pseudoscience fraud that has permeated the farthest corners of the earth. Below is an example of this permeation as a layering effect eventually obscures the “root fraud”. Because of the “root fraud” each level or generation that moves away from the “root fraud” obscures and buries the initial fraud. As stated above; Fraud Vitiates Everything It Touches, however fraud uncorrected becomes destined to the history books as fact. As is the case of the Freemasons of NASA and their massive steaming pile of elephant dung.

Layering A Hoax



This is NASA’s Patent Portfolio which details their patents and licensing program. Here’s an example of NASA patents and licenses fraud (#15) based on “Lunar technology” the Signal Boost. When I last checked the Apollo Missions were all hoaxes (#2) but look at the features! Signal Boost 

Here’s a quote “A portable communications signal booster, originally designed to improve communications for lunar missions,is lightweight, portable, and can boost incoming signals to improve local reception for cellphones, laptops, satellite, and Wi-Fi Internet receivers without the need for power plugs, cables, or batteries. It can be configured as an umbrella or window shade for easy deployment and compact storage”.


Using Occam’s Razor which is the simpler of the two. A. That NASA’s Signal Booster technology was designed for lunar missions even though there were none and we should disregard the fraud nonetheless and accept the technology at face value.B. NASA never went to the moon and the Signal Booster technology is bogus. If you chose B. than you’re correct.

Consider for a moment that today’s automobiles get an average of 25.8 mpg and thehttp://i1.wp.com/www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/501/Ford_Model_T.jpg?resize=310%2C208Model T in 1908 got between 16-25mpg. Does it make any sense that in 107 years there has been no significant increase in fuel efficiency or utilization of more efficient power sources for cars? However, NASA can send a probe (New Horizon’s) 3 billion miles to Pluto with pin point accuracy and return pristine images that look about as real as a $4 dollar bill? Does that seem plausible? #6 on the list above nullifies that satellites exist, which sadly for NASA enthusiasts means neither did the New Horizon’s mission.



Where’s Antarctica? Why is the map segmented into “33” sections?

In Part 2 we planted a seed in regards to Antarctica never being traversed by man and the 52 countries that signed onto the U.N. Antarctic Treaty to prevent any exploration by non-military personnel. However a quote from the treaty says; “52 parties set aside Antarctica as a scientific preserve, establishes freedom of scientific investigation and bans military activity on that continent” Obviously, the exact opposite is true of Antarctica. Antarctica is under military lock and key and scientific investigation by independent researchers is prohibited and enforced by the “same banned military that the U.N. Antarctic Treaty quoted above” This is a severe dislocation of facts, but yet there it is. So in my book, the U.N. Treaty is merely a hoax and does not carry out it’s stated intention.

What is the big deal about Antarctica? No other continents that I know of has lock-down security, but Antarctica does. We know almost nothing about it except that it’s really cold and Penguins love it. But as the Hoax chart above indicates, satellites don’t exist nor do any credible images or video footage of earth. We therefore have no direct evidence (besides cartographers) what the continents really look like, how big they are in relation to other landmasses and are they geographically situated as portrayed to us? What if for example a continent was in a different location than we’ve been told, that might cause a bit of a ruckus don’t you think? What if a continent was much bigger or smaller than we thought?

Take a look at different maps to see the differences between them, Why not just one “definitive map?” Come to think of it, whydidn’t they put Antarctica on the U.N. flag? Why is the U.N. map segmented into “33” sections which is a heavily promoted and recognized occult number? Do you believe it’s a hapless coincidence that Freemasonry has 33 degrees and Satanists revel in the number 33 like maggots feasting on a rotted carcass? We also know that NASA is rife with Freemasons and Satanists so it’s safe to conclude there is a nexus. I can clearly state with discernment, that NASA and the United Nations are clearly linked and have been co-conspirators in defrauding the public. But the big question remains, what are they hiding that requires 52 nations to sign the Antarctica Treaty then breach the very intent of the treaty before the ink was dry?

Lets Have A Little talk About Gravity

Before we apply some scrutiny to gravity you must take into account the mountain of fraud that has been accumulated in regards to NASA. Before you believe in anything that NASA promotes or espouses remember the dossier of deception that has been piling up thus far. When we think of gravity the picture of Isaac Newton and the falling apple usually come to mind, but that naive image is a crafted whitewashed version of Isaac Newton.http://i2.wp.com/www.themoderngnostic.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/issac-newton.jpg?resize=276%2C183

But what do we really know about Isaac Newton? First of all he was very similar to the boys from NASA and delved into occult numerology, Alchemy and Esotericism. However Newton was the Grand Master of the Secretive Priory Of Scion. The Priory Of Scion was dedicated to the preservation of the satanic Merovingian bloodline that was an early forerunner to the Rothschild Khazarian Mafia.

It’s also clear that Newtons Principia was rewritten around 1723 by the Jesuits who are the real hidden hand behind the RKM. This explains the seemingly paradoxical nature of Newton and how the finished work of Newtons Principia was further distorted to create false political and scientific dogma manifested in NASA today.


Society Of Jesus (Jesuits)

[1]To return specifically to Newton once more, the cute little tale (originating from Newton) about seeing an apple fall from a tree and thereupon falling into a “deep meditation” on the nature of gravity sometime in the summer of 1666 is obviously a politically correct and safe enough version of events that would have served to protect Newton’s image from his secret obsession with alchemy and esotericism. Note: The year 1666

It was a collection of works found posthumously in Newton’s library, papers and note books which revealed that Newton had spent more of his life immersed in studies of alchemy (as well as theology, Bible chronology and natural magic) than he had spent working on “pure science.”

Ironically, since Newton’s time, all notions of forces somehow transcending time or space were considered to be inviolation of Newton’s Laws, despite the fact that the great man himself saw neither his laws as sacrosanct, nor as the limits of a universe which—in opposition to today’s fawning atheistic worshipers of Newtonhe saw as God’s creation! 

British astronomer and cosmologist Edward Harrison noted that “if Newton had lacked a mystical outlook there could not have been a Newtonian universe” What an unusual paradox since Newtonian Science has always been presented as a somewhat mechanical process that is likened to “gears” and “machinery-like” concepts that are purported as unbreakable laws. So even in the creation of Newton’s laws, Newton could not have elucidated his concepts without the aid of an intelligent designer. Quite a contradiction right from the get-go wouldn’t you say? Unsurprisingly Newtons concepts were delineated through the centuries to omit any reference to god or an intelligent designer from which his ideas originally sprang from.

As in Parts 1 and 2, we find Newtons occult roots much like NASA progenitors  Aleister Crowley, Jack Parsons, L. Ron Hubbard, Walt Disney and Arthur C. Clarke. To further muddy the waters of gravity, it was Arthur C. Clarke that invented the term “Zero G” in his 1952 book Islands In The Sky. If you read Parts 1 and 2, it’s hard to disregard any coincidences.

So let’s restate the question that Isaac Newton had to ponder when that magical apple fell from the tree. QUESTION: Why did the apple fall from the tree? ANSWER: Because it was more dense than the air around it. Conversely, if we let a balloon with helium go, it rises because it’s less dense than the air around it. What a truly simple idea, density. Remember, the same awesome power of gravity that holds the oceans to the earth like Velcro as it spins over 1,000 mph, somehow permits birds and insects to fly around as if it didn’t exist at all.

The hypocrisy of gravity is on display in the very oceans that are purported to be constrained by it. (note unintended hypocrisy of second sentence)

[2]In the water, the buoyant force of the water keeps you from sinking to the bottom, but you don’t actually notice the resistance to gravity. So astronauts train for weightlessness in deep swimming pools. You are still under the influence of gravity – but the buoyancy counteracts it, so you feel weightlessness. This is one of the reasons why scuba diving is so enjoyable.

The key word here is buoyancy. Here is a quote from the Wiki page.

“For this reason, an object whose density is greater than that of the fluid in which it is submerged tends to sink. If the object is either less dense than the liquid or is shaped appropriately (as in a boat), the force can keep the object afloat.

The only difference between water (liquid) and air (gas) is the density. Buoyancy is not confined to just water, it also pertains to “Air buoyancy”

Buoyancy of air

[3]Similar to objects at the bottom of its ocean of water looking upward at objects floating above it, humans live at the bottom of an “ocean” of air and look upward at balloons drifting above us. A balloon is suspended in air, and a jellyfish issuspended in water for the same reason: each is buoyed upward by a force equal to the weight of fluid that would occupy its volume; when that buoyant force equals its own weight, it neither rises nor falls. In one case, the displaced fluid is air; and in the other case, the fluid is water. Objects in water are buoyed up because the pressure acting up against the bottom of the object exceeds the pressure acting down against the top. Likewise, air pressure acting up against an object in air is greater than the pressure above pushing down. The buoyancy, in both cases, is equal to the weight of fluid displaced – Archimedes’ principle holds for air just as it does for water. 


It’s Not A Coincidence That A Submarine And Airship Look And Act The Same

The Earth’s atmosphere is composed of air. Air is a mixture of gases, 78% nitrogen and 21% oxygen with traces of water vapor, carbon dioxide, argon, and various other components. We usually model air as a uniform (no variation or fluctuation) gas with properties that are averaged from all the individual components. Any gas has certain properties that we can detect with our senses. The values and relations of the properties define the state of the gas. Again http://i2.wp.com/www.themoderngnostic.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/sand.jpeg?resize=233%2C177referring to the “state of matter”, NASA makes it clear that the “state of matter” is the medium thatwater or air buoyancy can be achieved. Gases and liquids are two sides of the same coin, one less dense than the other. NASA’s other “state of matter” is a solid which has more density than either a liquid or gas, making it possible for humans to have total buoyancy. However, if we go to the beach and put our feet in the sand we actually sink because it’s density is less than a slab of concrete for example.





I would like to personally thank Archimedes for explaining that buoyancy and density holds for air as it does water, ergo the same principle is applied to water and air. Furthermore, physicists say that “the force of gravity does not depend on the object’s shape, density, or what it is made of, Physicists at Penn State University state unequivocally that GRAVITY DEPENDS ON MASS AND DISTANCE AND NOTHING ELSE! 


That being said, one has to infer that the water at the bottom of the ocean has more gravitational pull exerted on it than the water at the top since it’s closer to the mass of the earth. The gravity at the surface would have to be the same or more than the gravity at the bottom of the ocean in order to keep the oceans from flying off into space (remember the weight of the oceans is supposedly based from the bottom up). But wait a minute, if the earth is spinning at 1,000 mph the centrifugal force would actually make the water surface heavier as you got closer to it.

The NOAA quotes this gem, The Effect of Centrifugal Force. It is this little known aspect of the moon’s orbital motion which is responsible for one of the two force components creating the tides. As the earth and moon whirl around this common center-of-mass, the centrifugal force produced is always directed away from the center of revolution”. The surface of the oceans would bear the brunt of the weight since centrifugal force is trying to spin the water away from it’s axis. But according to GRAVITY DEPENDS ON MASS AND DISTANCE AND NOTHING ELSE the gravitational pull at the surface has to be lessbecause it’s further from the center of mass (the ocean floor), but somehow the magical properties of gravity change to defy its own definition.  


Creating The Centrifugal Conundrum


A Ridiculous Paradox!!


Acording to the U.S. Geological Survey, there are over 332,519,000 cubic miles of water on the planet.  A cubic mile is the volume of a cube measuring one mile on each side. Of this vast volume of water, NOAA’s National Geophysical Data Center estimates that 321,003,271 cubic miles is in the ocean. That’s enough water to fill about 352,670,000,000,000,000,000 gallon-sized milk containers! As I stated before, A gallon of water weighs 8.34lbs multiplied by 352,670,000,000,000,000,000, it’s a ridiculous tonnage that is not going to be influenced one iota by the moon if we take gravity at face value that GRAVITY DEPENDS ON MASS AND DISTANCE AND NOTHING ELSE! But again, somehow this magical gravity can do things that defy it’s own definition. 

The parade of constantly morphing and changing models about the moon’s effect on ocean’s and tides is nothing short of a carnival side-show. As questions arise that challenge the contradictory and implausible http://i2.wp.com/www.themoderngnostic.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/download-93.jpg?resize=150%2C150explanations that NASA and the science community put forth, they see fit to change the model to accommodate the astute questions that are raised. This isn’t science, just your old friend Mr. Pseudoscience.

Let’s take a look at how ridiculous and inconsistent the depictions of the moon’s effect on earth’s oceans and tides and how the Gravity story keeps changing. These images can be commonly searched for and you’ll see a wide variation of different models that try to explain how the moon defies the very definition of gravity and is powerful enough to “lift” the oceans. One would figure a uniform model would be used throughout the world and especially the U.S., but that’s not what we see in the variations of a “supposedly” simple concept. Why? Because no authentic photo or video footage has ever been put forward showing the earth or actual satellites in space. These images refer to the “tidal Bulge” that the moon exerts over the earth as it “flattens” it out and pulls the oceans.


#1 Single Tidal Bulge


#2 Two Tidal Bulges (due to inertia & gravity) with one arrow indicating the pull of the moon creates a Tidal Bulge on both sides but is created by the side facing the moon


#3 Two Tidal Bulges with Arrows indicating the direction of the pull of the moon creating bulges on both sides. How can the Tidal Bulge opposite the moon bulge out when the moon is shown pulling the opposite direction?

To solve the problem they come up with this solution;


#4 Two Tidal Bulges caused by the moon and the sun pulling in opposite directions?


From a Million Miles Away, NASA Camera Shows Moon Crossing Face of Earth Here is the latest fake satellite image from NASA DSCOVR Where’s the “Tidal Bulge”?  Where’s the Oblate Spheroid? Where’s the pear-shape? Why Aren’t the clouds morphing? Where's the 22,000 satellites and space debris? Are you kidding me? 

Here is NASA’s Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera ‘EPIC’  http://epic.gsfc.nasa.gov/


Do you see an “oblate spheroid” or “pear-shaped” earth? All I see is the same type of CGI/Photoshop graphic and no morphing clouds, Really!

But Wait, Neil DisGrace deGrasse Tyson is contradicting NASA’s latest imagery. Now I’m so confused, should I believe Neil deGrasse Tyson or NASA imagery? Should I agree with Neil deGrasse Tyson even though he’s quoted as saying he wants be a“master of geoengineering”? Does that mean he endorsed the intentional spraying of lithium aerosol by NASA as reported earlier in this article?

Neil deGrasse Tyson is a paid shill of NASA


By trusting our own senses and observing nature we can make rational and sensible observations that cannot be answered by the standard model of gravity. For example, how could a small bird skim inches above the water while escaping the very same force that supposedly holds the oceans to the earth like velcro?  And if the moon had it’s way, the massive gravitational pull it supposedly exerts on the tides would pull the small bird and (everything else) to the moon faster than shit through a goose. continue reading

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is solid proof that gravity is used to explain how water can cover a convex sphere rotating at 1000 mph.....do the book and paper experiment to prove that you CAN make two objects of opposite densities fall at the same rate...NASA says that only in a vacuum can two objects of different densities fall at the same rate...a bowling ball and feather, etc. this is patently false and doing the book and paper experiment proves it....gravity explains what they cannot!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bump to remind people of his site, still down. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


MG's new page about flat earth. Here is an excerpt:

Remember, Gravity:

1) Has only been “proven” with extremely large objects, like the Sun, Moon and Earth


2) Defined as “weight” in its original Latin definition, yet the word “weight” not included in Newton’s Law of Gravity definition


3) Can be broken anytime by jumping up and down or waving arm


4) Can allow astro-nots to space walk at 130 miles in space, yet the Moon, with 1/6th the gravity can move our oceans up and down 2X in one day.





Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.