Jump to content
Sign Up To Remove Ads! | Purchase An Ad Slot!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies. Want this topic removed from the archive?

Ukshep

Shooter's brain probed for hidden diseases...

Recommended Posts

 Ukshep    25,442

I've heard it all now!

Investigators are continuing to probe the brain of Las Vegas gunman Stephen Paddock as they search for clues to explain why he opened fire on a crowd of concertgoers two weeks ago.

Paddock’s body has been transported to Stanford University, where neuropathologists will turn their microscopes on the mass murderer’s gray matter.

Microscopic tissue examination can reveal otherwise hidden conditions such as dementia and chronic traumatic encephalopathy or CTE.

Paddock’s brain has so far shown no obvious sign of tumor, injury or abnormality during a more routine autopsy conducted last week by Vegas coroners, according to officials — who have yet to release toxicology results or an official cause and manner of death.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/15/vegas-shooters-brain-probed-for-hidden-diseases/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
notgoingtorespond   
notgoingtorespond

Im not saying he was the shooter....but....if he was, everyone knows the disease....liberalism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 OdinsEye    282
8 minutes ago, Ukshep said:

Paddock’s brain has so far shown no obvious sign of tumor, injury or abnormality during a more routine autopsy conducted last week by Vegas coroners, according to officials — who have yet to release toxicology results or an official cause and manner of death.

Read again, no damage to the brain = no head-shot = no suicide... you dont shoot yourself in the chest to kill yourself... especially not in the right side(based on pictures w/blood)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Ukshep    25,442
Just now, OdinsEye said:

Read again, no damage to the brain = no head-shot = no suicide... you dont shoot yourself in the chest to kill yourself... especially not in the right side(based on pictures w/blood)

Oh... You are right... Is this a slip up:?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Ukshep    25,442
5 minutes ago, notgoingtorespond said:

Im not saying he was the shooter....but....if he was, everyone knows the disease....liberalism.

I wish it was that straightforward. The left is having their buttons pushed. Just like we are. But for now it's them... It's saddening to know. It can get you down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 OdinsEye    282
Just now, Ukshep said:

Oh... You are right... Is this a slip up:?

possibly, for sure he died while coughing up blood... probable that he drowned in his own blood... so its clear it wasn't instant death

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, OdinsEye said:

Read again, no damage to the brain = no head-shot = no suicide... you dont shoot yourself in the chest to kill yourself... especially not in the right side(based on pictures w/blood)

you're right, very good point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Dr. Evil    2,557

The FBI is in charge of the autopsy so we know what it'll conclude.

12 minutes ago, Cinnamon said:

The picture they showed of the supposed dead Paddock had head damage.

That's what I thought too. Gun in the mouth was my assumption.

BTW this rense link to a Shimatsu story makes some interesting points about ISIS and the Saudi's in Vegas. Worth a read. 

http://www.rense.com/general96/friendsofjihad.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Zen Zilli    52
31 minutes ago, Cinnamon said:

The picture they showed of the supposed dead Paddock had head damage.

A complete fabrication IMO Easy to do when you know how.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 askakido    329
2 hours ago, notgoingtorespond said:

Im not saying he was the shooter....but....if he was, everyone knows the disease....liberalism.

Nah... if so, then its just a case of "Following Orders".  Or is that a mental disease too?   Only question there would be "Who's orders?"

Since 1914 millions of soldiers have fired weapons (such as guns) to kill other people.  Early on many really didn't want to kill another human being but they were 'given orders' to shoot to kill (or their own officers would shot them to death), and following their orders, they collectively killed over at least a hundred million people.  Just following orders to kill.  that was not "liberalism" that was Killing... pure and simple.. just following orders.  Sometimes however an individual will just follow his own internal orders by his own free will.  And that really bugs people -- he must be a 'criminal" or he must be insane.

At least Cain killed out of his own Anger and his own Rage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×