Jump to content
Advertise With Us! Or Sign Up To Remove Ads!
Hello, readers! Please consider adding conspiracyoutpost.com to your adblock whitelist. Our ads support the development and upkeep of the site.
snowball

Paddock CALLED THE DAMN LOBBY, just wanted to go to sleep.

Recommended Posts

 snowball    12
Now Mandalay hotel security has reported Paddock CALLED THE LOBBY to complain about
noisy partiers right before the shooting !!! The guy was trying to go to sleep. Unreal.

Stephen Paddock, Las Vegas shooter, called hotel security before rampage

 
 
 
 
his neighbor calls in talk show the day it happened to say no way would Paddock have done this
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 apache54    4,137

your going to see all kinds of things to further MUDDY the waters of a botched incident, by whom we are not sure yet!!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Mehitable    1,316

If Mandalay Bay is wise, they will pursue the multi-shooter theories as to let the one shooter theory stand is to open themselves up to unbelievable numbers of lawsuits.  And if we DON'T see the lawsuits, based on their lax security, there will be a lot of other questions raised.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 God Man    312

Lies and misdirection, oh my.

Come on, if he had the hammer and guns and was planning on shooting everyone it makes no sense that he would call the desk.  The shooting started at just after 10:00 PM which is not that late.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Mehitable    1,316
5 minutes ago, Walk Softly said:

How do you figure? 

Based on the official story, he got more than 20 guns up to that room, was able to break the glass of two windows and it took, I understand, up to 72 minutes for them to "stop" him.  Also I understand the cameras on the 32nd floor were not working and he had allegedly set up some kind of camera system outside the room to spot anyone in the hallway.  Apparently, according to the official set of lies, he had better security than the hotel.

They're going to say the hotel was lax in security and they're going to sue massively.  People sue over far less with far less supporting evidence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 therobots    103

If this is TRUE, then it is another nail in the coffin of the LIES.  Think about this: When someone complains about noice, typically the hotel (especially if the person calling is a VIP), will "investigate" by sending someone up there to check it out and address it as needed.

Why on earth would a person who is planning an attack like this call with such a complaint - knowing that someone "official" will probably be coming by the area?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Mehitable    1,316
10 minutes ago, God Man said:

Lies and misdirection, oh my.

Come on, if he had the hammer and guns and was planning on shooting everyone it makes no sense that he would call the desk.  The shooting started at just after 10:00 PM which is not that late.

I read the article, apparently he had called the day BEFORE so it was 1:30 am Sunday, he supposedly was shooting late Sunday night. 

Still, it goes to show the basic normalcy of his situation.  I don't believe this bullshit they're spinning about him at all.  If they can smear him like this based on literally nothing as I have seen ZERO evidence supporting any of their allegations, they can do this to ANY OF US.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 londonorchar    204
3 minutes ago, Mehitable said:

Based on the official story, he got more than 20 guns up to that room, was able to break the glass of two windows and it took, I understand, up to 72 minutes for them to "stop" him.  Also I understand the cameras on the 32nd floor were not working and he had allegedly set up some kind of camera system outside the room to spot anyone in the hallway.  Apparently, according to the official set of lies, he had better security than the hotel.

They're going to say the hotel was lax in security and they're going to sue massively.  People sue over far less with far less supporting evidence.

Where did you find this tidbit of info???  This sounds far too convenient just like on 9/11 the Pentagon camera's were off!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Mehitable    1,316
1 minute ago, londonorchar said:

Where did you find this tidbit of info???  This sounds far too convenient just like on 9/11 the Pentagon camera's were off!

it's been all over this and other sites repeatedly since the first day.  I don't know where it originated, but I think it is true or they would have been showing us pics or video of him going in and out of his room.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up to our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


Jump To Top
×