Jump to content
Sign Up To Remove Ads!


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies. Want this topic removed from the archive?


Gov't Says Radiation Good For You

Recommended Posts

 rbear    240

Linear No-Threshold Model and Standards for Protection Against Radiation; Notice of Docketing and Request for Comment

This Proposed Rule document was issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

For related information, Open Docket Folder  Docket folder icon


Petition for rulemaking; notice of docketing and request for comment.


The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has received three petitions for rulemaking (PRM) requesting that the NRC amend its “Standards for Protection Against Radiation” regulations and change the basis of those regulations from the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) model of radiation protection to the radiation hormesis model. The radiation hormesis model provides that exposure of the human body to low levels of ionizing radiation is beneficial and protects the human body against deleterious effects of high levels of radiation. Whereas, the LNT model provides that radiation is always considered harmful, there is no safety threshold, and biological damage caused by ionizing radiation (essentially the cancer risk) is directly proportional to the amount of radiation exposure to the human body (response linearity). The petitions were submitted by Carol S. Marcus, Mark L. Miller, and Mohan Doss (the petitioners), dated February 9, 2015, February 13, 2015, and February 24, 2015, respectively. These petitions were docketed by the NRC on February 20, 2015, February 27, 2015, and March 16, 2015, and have been assigned Docket Numbers. PRM-20-28, PRM-20-29, and PRM-20-30, respectively. The NRC is examining the issues raised in these petitions to determine whether they should be considered in rulemaking. The NRC is requesting public comments on these petitions for rulemaking.


Submit comments by September 8, 2015. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC is able to assure consideration only for comments received on or before this date. etc cont http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=NRC-2015-0057-0010

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
 CSB    2,162

http://www.apic4me.com/webpics/smileys/electrocuted.gif Tell me again how good it is .

It looks like they want to raise the public dose of radiation to the worker's levels . 


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
 rbear    240

I am not done looking into this, just so much to cover/read/etc. I think this comes because of furozema (sp?) and the radiation levels rising every day in the us/elsewhere. Also this way they can say seafood is good for you, and radiated tobacco (us, some other countries) is good for you. Ok not the cigs maybe as the nicotine counters the flouride but you must question, if they say its good for you, how can one be good and not #2? Now Tobacco Companies Hid Evidence of Radiation in Cigarettes so as you can see, radiation is not good you you. More analysis when I get back to it.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
 rbear    240

etc... http://www.veteranstruthnetwork.com/index.php/component/k2/itemlist/category/124-fukishima (<--- see for all)

some flight crews are finding, they are losing their hair and developing symptoms of immune system breakdowns that are traditionally very symptomatic of long term high altitude exposure to radionuclides in the cabins of airliners they work in. One airline had the audacity to blame the uniforms for this nuance, but some passengers have taken expensive geiger counters with them on trans-Pacific flights and found the radiation levels aloft are unusually ‘high’, notwithstanding what you would normally expect from cosmic radiation up there.

Though many people are not trained radiologists, they do in fact have the ability to read their geiger counters correctly, even if they cannot themselves isolate which isotope or radionuclide is causing the readings. In the cases of people in California, who own many HEPA air filters in their homes, they merely take the aggregate dirt off the filters and then read this with their meters. Many, many videos of these experiments by ordinary people with expensive meters shows that, beyond any reasonable doubt, the radiation not only is here, but it’s here in inexplicable abundance. Arguably one could make a case that in a post nuclear era, radiation is abundant; but since 2011, the global background radiation measurements made by many of us, including myself, are so alarming that they fall into a category known as ‘breathtaking’, to say the least.

So what was the EPA and the government’s answer to this very plausible threat from Japan? Well, for starters, they began to petition to raise the allowable limits in our environment by a magnitude of at least ‘ten’ if not more, in drinking water and food. One has to ask one’s self that if there was no ‘threat’ from this problem in Japan, ‘why’ would a sudden fast track approach to raising these limits really need to be? Why would the government need to change anything if Fukushima was not really a problem at all? Well, certainly the limits imposed on food and water put all of our food and water we ingest today into a near ‘hazardous waste’ category of contaminated material. Unfortunately it’s our ‘food’ and ‘water’ supply here, not something we can choose not to ingest or bathe in or drink. Part of the answer lies in results normal everyday shoppers have gotten from taking their GM meters to the grocery store.

It’s very ‘sobering’ to have your meter indicate a significant ‘rise’ in radiation in everything from dairy products to produce, and indeed, any number of types of seafood that has been harvested from Pacific Ocean waters. I have, as a truck driver, personally seen where a load of 38,000 pounds of ‘Pacific salmon’ suddenly became less than 8,000 pounds of ‘heavily reworked’ salmon that had to be chopped up to remove lesions and sores on it before repackaging for a major food supplier in So. California. Why? Especially if there was no threat? Had a geiger meter been taken into that 53 foot trailer I hauled it in, there is no doubt in my mind that in fact that ‘salmon’ they reworked probably met the category of amount of radiation to mandate labelling the truck with HAZMAT placards. This is food we’re talking about here. In the past four years, background radiation in many many U.S. localities has risen dramatically: cont http://www.veteranstruthnetwork.com/index.php/component/k2/itemlist/category/124-fukishima

Your Radiation This Week No 21 

Sept 5 to Sept 12, 2015

(San Francisco) September 12, 2015 – Good Day, this is “Your Radiation This Week.” These are the recorded Radiation Highs that affected people this week around the United States and in your neighborhood. Let’s get right to it.



Storm in the Plains

*Listed in Counts per Minute, a Count is One Radioactive Decay Registered by the Instrument.

All Radiation Counts reported are partial Counts. Uncounted types of radiation include Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Neutron and X-Ray radiation.  Uncounted radiation, if added, makes the actual Count higher and more dangerous.

The highest radiation reporting city is listed first, the least radioactive city is listed last. Still, all reporting cities are above normal.

Normal Radiation is 5 to 20 CPM. [6]


2,323 CPM, 464.6 Times Normal, Billings, MT Gamma, Beta.  
1,913 CPM, 382.6 Times Normal, Ft Wayne IN Gamma, Beta.  
1,508 CPM, 301.6 Times Normal, Pittsburgh, PA, Gamma, Beta.  
1,435 CPM, 287 Times Normal, San Diego, CA Gamma, Beta.  
1,431 CPM, 286.2 Times Normal, Portland, ME Gamma, Beta.  
1,365 CPM, 273 Times Normal, Spokane, WA. Gamma, Beta.  
1,359 CPM, 271.8 Times Normal, Champaign, IL Gamma, Beta.  
1,359 CPM, 271.8 Times Normal, Miami, FL.

Gamma, Beta.

cont http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/09/12/your-radiation-this-week-no-21/



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites