Jump to content
Advertise With Us! Or Sign Up To Remove Ads!
Hello, readers! Please consider adding conspiracyoutpost.com to your adblock whitelist. Our ads support the development and upkeep of the site.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Ukshep

STAN ROMANEK UPDATE: GUILTY!

Recommended Posts

 Ukshep    17,196

A more than three-year-long child pornography case that gained national notoriety came to a close Tuesday with a split verdict. At least, for now.

Stanley Tiger Romanek, a 54-year-old Loveland man, was found guilty of felony possession of child pornography but not guilty of distribution of child pornography.

Deputy District Attorney Mitch Murray said in his closing statements that at its core, the case is "very simple" and that the child pornography found on Romanek's computer made it there through Romanek's "purposeful actions."

"There's nothing magical, nothing mysterious about it. ... The evidence is all in front of you, completely there," he said.

http://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2017/08/08/romanek-found-guilty/549901001/

I had totally forgot about them going after him on this....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Ukshep    17,196
3 minutes ago, Tarmalen said:

How the hell did they split?

 

Well they say he had it but did not distribute?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Cinnamon    20,036

There are a  lot more people than just him involved... always are when there is child porn involved. How about going after the ones he got it from and the ones who took the pics, too? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Smudge    78

At the end of the film they made about him when they said he was under investigation and showed others that had been set up with explicit images of children, I have to say I shuddered. Call me naive but I had no idea they were capable of such a thing.

I can take most things in life on the chin but to be accused of any harm to children frightens the life out of me. I am not saying he is innocent but obviously there has been times when people are, and that's what terrifies me.

How can we stay safe from this sort of hacking, would we even know if they had put pictures on to a computer? Or just find out when they arrest you.

If you know please share. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pedos should be taken out to the street and ....It's the most disgusting thing deserving of a long painful death, revived then do it all again.  That being said and knowing any human with a functioning heart feels that way, there's no better way to frame someone and throw away the key.  I've been following Stan's story for years and he's been beaten, his computers have been hacked many times before with nefarious warnings, just watch the Netflix video.  That being said am I 100% positive he didn't do it?  No.  But as our court system relies on taking an educated guess much of the time -my conclusion-HE WAS FRAMED.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Smudge    78
13 minutes ago, GreenMountainBoy said:

Pedos should be taken out to the street and ....It's the most disgusting thing deserving of a long painful death, revived then do it all again.  That being said and knowing any human with a functioning heart feels that way, there's no better way to frame someone and throw away the key.  I've been following Stan's story for years and he's been beaten, his computers have been hacked many times before with nefarious warnings, just watch the Netflix video.  That being said am I 100% positive he didn't do it?  No.  But as our court system relies on taking an educated guess much of the time -my conclusion-HE WAS FRAMED.  

 

But isn't there a way of proving he was framed?

Others obviously have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jump To Top
×