Jump to content
Advertise With Us! Or Sign Up To Remove Ads!
Hello, readers! Please consider adding conspiracyoutpost.com to your adblock whitelist. Our ads support the development and upkeep of the site.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

marlowe

"Smart People" Need To Check Their "Cognitive Privilege"

Recommended Posts

 marlowe    1,582

This vid is a bit too long but you get the idea......I completely understand how high IQ white

people are intimidating to low IQ Negroes......But there is nothing to get upset about because the pendulum

is swinging back to the RIGHT.....LOL

Published on Aug 8, 2017

If you are an intelligent person, you have “cognitive privilege” according to an op-ed in the Daily Iowan

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 coco    348

We now know that intelligence is not something we have significant control over but is something we are born with. We are living in a society in which success is increasingly linked to one’s intelligence. This is not to say that intelligence is the only factor that is important. All that is implied is that below a certain threshold of intelligence, there are fewer and fewer opportunities. These opportunities are being shifted upward to jobs that require heavier cognitive lifting or else are being replaced by robots. Thus, the accident of having been born smart enough to be able to be successful is a great benefit that you did absolutely nothing to earn. Consequently, you have nothing to be proud of for being smart. 

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-08/its-not-fair-smart-people-need-check-their-cognitive-privilege

Written by an idiot, I presume.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 marlowe    1,582

Re>>>>"Written by an idiot, I presume."

If you google "Is liberalism a mental illness ? " you will get over a thousand hits.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Lucy Barnable    4,280

Why the Decline of America’s Average IQ is a Cause for Concern

IQ† is one of those things that some people don’t like to talk about.  Yet, for so many reasons and in so many ways, it is an important concept, on which so many things in life turn.  It is well known that there is a strong positive correlation between IQ and educational level, lifetime earnings, success in your chosen vocation, personal confidence, and (perhaps surprisingly) success in social interactions and relationships.  In general, I think people accept that a higher IQ is a good thing to have.  What causes problems, however, is when we start talking about the genetic component of IQ.  After a long period in which social scientists sought to downplay or eliminate the notion of this genetic component, more recent studies in genetics and heritability seem to have consistently found that the genetic component of IQ makes up around 60-80% of this trait.  Certainly there are other factors involved such a childhood diet, early childhood education, and so forth.  However, these are not nearly as important as many social scientists had thought (or rather, hoped) they would be.

However, it is when you delve into the realm of talking about group IQ – the statistics of IQ variability between different racial and ethnic groups – that you really begin to run afoul of the sensibilities of today’s modern equalitarians and other SJW-influenced outlets.  Indeed, discussing IQ is the single most contentious element in the debates over human biodiversity.  In many circles, the very concept of genetic IQ differences, especially between groups, leads to the sort of self-censorship that causes some to wonder if it’s “racist” to even talk about whether there are “genes for IQ” or not.  It’s acceptable to observe that the reason blacks can, on average, run faster than whites is due to genetic variances.  However, when you start observing that American whites have an average IQ around 103, while American blacks average around 85, that’s when you get put into the punishment box.

Yet – IQ effects are real.  This has been most extensively investigated in recent years by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen (a psychologist and a political scientist, respectively), culminating in their books IQ and the Wealth of Nations and IQ and Global Inequality. They observed the strong positive correlation between average national IQ and national wealth as expressed through per capita GDP, GDP growth, and other economic indicators.  Basically, the higher the average IQ of a nation, the richer, more productive, and more innovative the nation’s economy is.
-----
As a result of these IQ clusters, we can divide the countries of the world into four basic groups:

1. Innovators – these are the countries with average national IQs ranging from ~96-108.  Typically, these nations are characterised by advanced infrastructure and educational systems, lower corruption and higher quality administration, and they contribute to scientific and technological advances to an outsized degree compared to the rest of the world.

2. Maintainers – these are the countries ranging from ~88-95.  While they are certainly capable of keeping the lights on and the water flowing (for the most part), they don’t really contribute much to the development of new technologies or to scientific output.  They can maintain, but not advance to any great degree, the level of human civilisation, either technically or morally/philosophically.

3. Stragglers – these countries range between ~80-87.  The levels of social organisation, infrastructure, and administrative competency are low, while corruption and socially disfunctional behaviours are high.  These societies aren’t necessarily falling apart, but they aren’t exactly successful by any reasonable metric, either.

4. Basket Cases – these are the countries with average IQs below 80.  Most of them are either failing states, or else would be if they were not propped up by extensive foreign aid.  They are generally characterised by one or two core cities with some infrastructure and organisation, surrounded by a hinterland of tribal divisions or areas under the effective control of petty warlords.  The cities (and therefore the government) are often controlled by a small clique comprised of the hundreds or thousands (out of multiple millions of population) with IQs high enough to allow them to understand and apply things like administration, science, and economics.

https://neociceroniantimes.wordpress.com/2016/08/21/why-the-decline-of-americas-average-iq-is-a-cause-for-concern/

When we're all brown with an average IQ of 85 we can all be equally miserable together. Then those who rule over the stupid masses, the ones who didn't practice miscegenation, won't have anything to worry about because we'll be too dumb to know what that is.
Hooray for equality.

:grumph:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Condor    917
1 hour ago, marlowe said:

This vid is a bit too long but you get the idea......I completely understand how high IQ white

people are intimidating to low IQ Negroes......But there is nothing to get upset about because the pendulum

is swinging back to the RIGHT.....LOL

Published on Aug 8, 2017

If you are an intelligent person, you have “cognitive privilege” according to an op-ed in the Daily Iowan

 

 

I live this every day.  The just will always be hated for pointing out the unjust.  The light shall be hated by the dark. Truth exposes the lies. 

Be light. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 VonLud    823
2 hours ago, Lucy Barnable said:

When we're all brown with an average IQ of 85 we can all be equally miserable together. Then those who rule over the stupid masses, the ones who didn't practice miscegenation, won't have anything to worry about because we'll be too dumb to know what that is.

Hooray for equality.

:grumph:

 

Statistical group IQ has little to do with individual IQ.

You can take a child of any race, and they will have the same statistical advantages as a child of any other race, given the same conditions.

I think people under 135 IQ should be put down.

Then, the rest could plot the deaths of one another.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Siddrix    883

People said i was Dumb for standing on that street corner with an end of the world sign... But look who's laugh'n now... hahaha!

:end: :gsbrnint:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 abigfatzero    2,171
1 hour ago, VonLud said:

I think people under 135 IQ should be put down.

Then, the rest could plot the deaths of one another.

:gsbrnint:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 kbet    797

It is about negging people into submission, so no one will oppose the Monarchy/Nobility, in the Neo-Feudalistic, superstate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jump To Top
×