Jump to content
Advertise With Us! Or Sign Up To Remove Ads!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Condor

The US Marines tested all-male squads against mixed-gender ones, and the results were pretty bleak

Recommended Posts

 Condor    979

https://qz.com/499618/the-us-marines-tested-all-male-squads-against-mixed-gender-ones-and-the-men-came-out-ahead/

Overall, the report says, all-male teams and crews outperformed mixed-gender ones on 93 out of 134 tasks evaluated. All-male teams were universally faster “in each tactical movement.” On “lethality,” the report says:

All-male squads, teams and crews and gender-integrated squads, teams, and crews had a noticeable difference in their performance of the basic combat tasks of negotiating obstacles and evacuating casualties. For example, when negotiating the wall obstacle, male Marines threw their packs to the top of the wall, whereas female Marines required regular assistance in getting their packs to the top. During casualty evacuation assessments, there were notable differences in execution times between all-male and gender-integrated groups, except in the case where teams conducted a casualty evacuation as a one-Marine fireman’s carry of another (in which case it was most often a male Marine who “evacuated” the casualty)

:getoutl:
 

Diversity is our strength.  Get with the program to destroy America.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Pilgrim    46
2 hours ago, Condor said:

https://qz.com/499618/the-us-marines-tested-all-male-squads-against-mixed-gender-ones-and-the-men-came-out-ahead/

Overall, the report says, all-male teams and crews outperformed mixed-gender ones on 93 out of 134 tasks evaluated. All-male teams were universally faster “in each tactical movement.” On “lethality,” the report says:

All-male squads, teams and crews and gender-integrated squads, teams, and crews had a noticeable difference in their performance of the basic combat tasks of negotiating obstacles and evacuating casualties. For example, when negotiating the wall obstacle, male Marines threw their packs to the top of the wall, whereas female Marines required regular assistance in getting their packs to the top. During casualty evacuation assessments, there were notable differences in execution times between all-male and gender-integrated groups, except in the case where teams conducted a casualty evacuation as a one-Marine fireman’s carry of another (in which case it was most often a male Marine who “evacuated” the casualty)

:getoutl:
 

Diversity is our strength.  Get with the program to destroy America.

Hahaha.  And that is why a war between the Right (mostly White males) and the left (mostly Feminist Females and a coalition of blacks, mexicans and self-hating gender challenged White men)  would quickly be over.  Women are great at talking and voting, but when the shit hits the fan, it's better to be a White man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 apache54    4,918

they already knew this from years ago, so there is another side to this for another purpose, besides wasting our tax dollars!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Lucy Barnable    5,048
8 minutes ago, apache54 said:

they already knew this from years ago, so there is another side to this for another purpose, besides wasting our tax dollars!!

Right? I wonder how much this completely useless study with it's obvious outcome cost us tax payers? The only purpose of it that I can see is to anger SJW's. Maybe they'll have one on how frustration and anger affects the performance female soldiers next. 

:wacko:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 apache54    4,918
6 minutes ago, Lucy Barnable said:

Right? I wonder how much this completely useless study with it's obvious outcome cost us tax payers? The only purpose of it that I can see is to anger SJW's. Maybe they'll have one on how frustration and anger affects the performance female soldiers next. 

:wacko:

:iagree:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Groove    1,957
2 hours ago, apache54 said:

they already knew this from years ago, so there is another side to this for another purpose, besides wasting our tax dollars!!

So true. They have done this test time and time again with the same results. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 JayDee    1,292

Then the solution is obvious. Tax all male soldiers at least 18% and order them to be less physically fit. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×