Jump to content
  • Sign Up
Cinnamon

Former FBI counter-terrorism expert: "The CIA created ISIS"

Recommended Posts

Published on Jul 21, 2017

Starting @19:30 -- “We created ISIS. I mean ISIS is no less than the people up in Islamburg, no less then than Gülen. It is a CIA-creation. John McCain, for heavens sake, was over there with the ISIS officials. We created them. They came from Al-Nusra Front, the Syrian Liberation Front. These two organizations combined and they morphed into ISIS. It’s our creation! We created them and we still direct them! When ISIS warriors are injured in battle, where are they transported? They’re transported, for heavens sake, to Israel! They’re treated by Israelis in Israeli hospitals and brought back to battle!”
----------
Movie director Oliver Stone's son, Sean Stone, sits down with award-winning journalist and former FBI counter-terrorism consultant Paul L. Williams to learn more about “Operation Gladio” and the CIA’s historic affinity for propping up paramilitary groups across the world. Williams shares his experiences researching the murky history of Washington’s relations with the enigmatic Fethullah Gülen, an exiled Turkish statesman and clergyman, as well as documenting the CIA’s connections to the Taliban, ISIS, and far-right extremists in Europe and Latin America. Finally, we evaluate the modern-day implications of this complicated web of relationships.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What this story needs to do is get enough momentum round the world that the US networks can't ignore it.

Because ignoring is the only defence.

Because once the networks stop ignoring and laughably dismiss it as complete bollocks which is what they'll do, networks like RT telling the truth then get to pile in and rub the stoopid sheeple's noses in it till they just can't breath anymore cos of all the truth after truth that pours out.

And if they do push it, the networks can only ignore it for so long, till they start looking ridiculous, because even the sheeple look for a response, of any kind, to an allegation as "outrageous" as this is.

That's the way to force the reluctant US networks to "break" this story to the US sheeple. Question is: is RT going to use the power they already have to push the US networks to do the above, or is it just going to continue its current path, which is to be a pretend opposition truth teller, an outlet for the disaffected, and nothing more?

Answer to that gives us a read on whether RT really is what it claims to be or whether, like Infowars, it's merely zionist-lite disinformation

Edited by Dr. Evil
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Dr. Evil said:

Answer to that gives us a read on whether RT really is what it claims to be or whether, like Infowars, it's merely zionist-lite disinformation

Part of it. For sure. One side vs the other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm......I don't know the bigger picture on that and even tho I have one of those pics of mccain chumming with that skunk demon looking isis leader, (:gsbrnint:) I think there are a lot more people we see more often as deep in it as any letter agency. Mccain, kerry, among others. One thing about nationalism, it tends to cut back on the backscreen imperialism. If the tier 1 investors in our demise (ww3) can be resisted or deposed by the new administration and growing nationalist sentiment in the world, and more of the world follows us, it will at least put everything ottoman back in the pit. Those monies will shift purpose & places and even tho there is war, it is less than it would have been.

The war is still going to increase because the extinction increases and the acceptable resources decrease, its a matter of who/how and where. The us may get some token bomb, but that bomb will enrage the world on both sides and people won't stop for maybe 8 or 10 years. The real larger, pervasive and unspoken sentiment is "encroachment". People remember lives before being forced corporate products on a designed life plan. They also naturally turn within when times are hard, towards thier own and resort to thier nature, customs & traditions (or) like the rootless, embrace severe religions in the hope that the meaner they are to thier selves, the less mean god or divil may be to them. 

I have not heard much good about any of the letter agencies lately and even the deporatation has bordered on "token". I just recall that "discredit and dismantle the fbi" is a straight communist/islamic goal. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And all the other countries have their little pets too. The CIA is not pro-American. It is a rogue agency. Has been for a long, long time but the people in DC are scared of them. Or they are part of them. CIA is Clinton-Bush crime family. As a criminal mafia group, they need to be disbanded and scattered to the winds. They are going down anyway. Why? Because when they get rid of cash and bring in the UBI, which will be electronic/digital currency... The CIA will have no way to make any black market or blood money. So they are going to fight tooth and nail for their survival. But it will not survive. It will fall. In the meantime, we will have them creating havoc because they have read the writing on the wall. It's what they do. Analysis the situation and react. So we are getting all this Russia crap because the CIA is not going to just fade into the sunset nicely. They are going to go out in a pool of blood. ;) 

After all, you watch... the drug war is going to end. There will be no more illegal drugs to make lots of money on. It's already started and the experiments have been going really well too. No junkies and the junkies out there are being helped more and it's all turning out completely different than the scare mongering, war on drugs creeps, thought or said it would. Nothing these weirdos said came true. So the war on drugs.... It's almost over and done with. At least in the western, so called 'first' countries. Which by the way, are only the allies in WW2, and not anyone else. Even Russia is not a first world country but a second world country. It's not the economy that makes you a first, second or third world country. It's where you were, which side you were on,  in the 'Great Wars'.... ;)  An article that explains this really well.... 

http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/third_world_countries.htm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.