Jump to content
  • Sign Up
Sign in to follow this  
Ukshep

Warning: EPA Fighting to Keep Water Fluoridated

Recommended Posts

A lawsuit has been filed against the EPA by various watchdog organizations dedicated to removing fluoride from public drinking supplies. They want to force the EPA to ban the intentional addition of fluoride into drinking water supplies.

The lawsuit lays out all the evidence amassed about the harmful effects of fluoride, as well as the evidence that it is not necessary or beneficial to be ingested. It states that it has been disproven that fluoride helps prevent tooth decay when ingested, as thought when it was first introduced into drinking supplies in 1940.

Quote

It is now universally recognized by dental researchers, including the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Oral Health Division, that fluoride’s primary benefit comes from topical application. Fluoride does not need to be swallowed, therefore, to prevent tooth decay.

Whereas fluoride’s benefit to teeth comes from topical contact, fluoride’s health risks come from ingestion.

From there the lawsuit establishes the evidence that drinking fluoridated water is causing fluorosis, the discoloration of teeth.

And then, of course, it gets to the evidence that fluoride is a neurotoxin which causes significant harm to the brain, especially in children. They cite 300 studies which established the harm done by fluoride, 50 of which specifically found that exposure impairs cognitive functions. Fluoride exposure can cause a measurable drop in IQ and is considered among lead and mercury as a chemical toxic to the brain.

The lawsuit seeks to establish a court ruling on the toxicology of fluoride in order to meet current standards for an EPA ban on neurotoxins in drinking water. Based on a preponderance of the evidence, the suit claims fluoride should fit into the category of what the EPA bans in order to protect public health.

Yet so far, government agencies have been reluctant to believe the numerous studies about the harm of fluoride. This case lays it all out plain as day for the eyes to see.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-13/warning-epa-fighting-keep-water-fluoridated

I'd Personally LOVE to see as many others will I am sure, A total reversal on public consumption of fluoridated water. Imagine what that could do? The costs saved from health issues no longer afflicting people. The benefits of not being poisoned!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Ukshep said:

A lawsuit has been filed against the EPA by various watchdog organizations dedicated to removing fluoride from public drinking supplies. They want to force the EPA to ban the intentional addition of fluoride into drinking water supplies.

The lawsuit lays out all the evidence amassed about the harmful effects of fluoride, as well as the evidence that it is not necessary or beneficial to be ingested. It states that it has been disproven that fluoride helps prevent tooth decay when ingested, as thought when it was first introduced into drinking supplies in 1940.

From there the lawsuit establishes the evidence that drinking fluoridated water is causing fluorosis, the discoloration of teeth.

And then, of course, it gets to the evidence that fluoride is a neurotoxin which causes significant harm to the brain, especially in children. They cite 300 studies which established the harm done by fluoride, 50 of which specifically found that exposure impairs cognitive functions. Fluoride exposure can cause a measurable drop in IQ and is considered among lead and mercury as a chemical toxic to the brain.

The lawsuit seeks to establish a court ruling on the toxicology of fluoride in order to meet current standards for an EPA ban on neurotoxins in drinking water. Based on a preponderance of the evidence, the suit claims fluoride should fit into the category of what the EPA bans in order to protect public health.

Yet so far, government agencies have been reluctant to believe the numerous studies about the harm of fluoride. This case lays it all out plain as day for the eyes to see.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-13/warning-epa-fighting-keep-water-fluoridated

I'd Personally LOVE to see as many others will I am sure, A total reversal on public consumption of fluoridated water. Imagine what that could do? The costs saved from health issues no longer afflicting people. The benefits of not being poisoned!

Imagine how hard the depopulationists are going to fight to keep poisoning us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Automan63 said:

Imagine how hard the depopulationists are going to fight to keep poisoning us.

Imagine how hard they'll have to fight to survive themselves once people know the truth! :nodl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Ukshep said:

Imagine how hard they'll have to fight to survive themselves once people know the truth! :nodl:

Bunkers are an interesting structure....

Know what their not? Waterproof

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

also remember the Nazi's are credited for discovering that flouride is and may still be the only known drug to effect your believability  another words when taking flouride you will believe what your told!! that is the real reason it is in MOST major populated areas and allot of countries have banned its use!! so why does our government want to do this!!! control you!! like I keep saying what are they doing to help this country or its people NOTHING!! NOTHING!! wake up people time to remove these scumbags before they kill all of us!!

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Blipkints said:

When we had drought, it was mandatory for all new houses to have water catch systems, hahaha!

Not a bad idea anyway. We should all be providing for ourselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But yeah, our support is a long way away, so when then the asian mooz do the Push, are you Yanks going to be here? 

We're always remembering how we backed you lot. And how you backed us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Ukshep said:

Not a bad idea anyway. We should all be providing for ourselves.

That was big Gov because the reservoirs were almost dry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.