Jump to content
Advertise With Us! Or Sign Up To Remove Ads!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Cinnamon

Supreme Court Rules Against Police Use of Force Provocation Rule

Recommended Posts

 Cinnamon    23,070

Police officers cannot be held liable for use-of-force consequences even when they provoke a violent confrontation, the Supreme Court has ruled. The case involved a couple that was severely injured by two California officers searching for a wanted man.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court ruled 8-0 in favor of Los Angeles County, California, and two deputies with the county sheriff’s department. The case stems from a lawsuit against Los Angeles County and the deputies by a couple, Angel and Jennifer Mendez, who were shot repeatedly by the officers on October 1, 2010.

<snip>

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/supreme-court-rules-against-police-use-of-force-provocation-rule_052017

Another win for "the state". 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Robomont    144

equal protection clause means i cant be held liable for use of force against cops.14th amendment.

roll on 2!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Robomont    144

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/supreme-court-overturns-9th-circuits-provocation-rule-involving-police-use-of-force/article/2624433

from this,i can get my meth buddy to run beside a cops house then i say im chasing a thief,kick in a cops door and blast away.im liable for damages but no jail time as cops got no jail time for violating their civil liberties.

the usa rocks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×