Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
titanic1

The Law You Won't Be Told (Do Not Read if You Want To Serve On A Jury)

4 posts in this topic

This knowledge is for entertainment purposes only

 

What is Jury Nullification?

What is Jury Nullification? You won’t find it defined in your dictionary or described in your encyclopedia. You weren’t taught about it in school, and indeed it is even considered a crime to tell other people about it in some circumstances. Imagine that for a moment – it is a crime to inform a citizen as to their right, even the scope of their duty while serving on a jury.

According to the Wikipedia entry:

Jury nullification is a constitutional doctrine which allows juries to acquit criminal defendants who are technically guilty, but who do not deserve punishment. It occurs in a trial when a jury reaches a verdict contrary to the judge’s instructions as to the law. 

A jury verdict contrary to the letter of the law pertains only to the particular case before it. If a pattern of acquittals develops, however, in response to repeated attempts to prosecute a statutory offence, this can have the de facto effect of invalidating the statute. A pattern of jury nullification may indicate public opposition to an unwanted legislative enactment…

Most Americans have never even heard of such a doctrine. Thanks to numerous TV shows and real-life judges telling us that the only function of the jury is to render a decision based strictly upon the facts of the case, a key tenet of the justice system envisioned by the Founding Fathers has been lost. You see, it is not only the job of the jury to weigh guilt or innocence against the letter of the law, but also to judge the just nature of the statutes themselves. In this way, The People ultimately retain power over the government, rather than the government dictating to The People what is and what is not justice. This tenet is instrumental in protecting ourselves, as The People, from tyrannical laws and cronyism. This is why we have a jury system in the first place, not simply to act as a cog in the wheel of the justice system, but to be the justice in the system.

Let us imagine for a moment, that you live in a city where the Mayor makes soda-pop illegal. So illegal that he actually signs into law a criminal statute that makes it a jailable offense to dispense soda-pop. He makes a public campaign to warn about the evils of soda-pop, how detrimental it is to your health, while being crowned king of national doughnut day, and holding a vast amount stock in the city’s number-one importer of iced-tea.

Fascist Food and Nutrition Nazis

Now let us imagine that you are sitting on the jury for a criminal trial of a single-mom arrested for selling soda-pop to her neighbor, which had been “smuggled” in from outside of the city limits, and that the transaction was captured on an audio-video recording by police. You see that she is plainly guilty of violating the law, technically, but can’t in good-conscience send her off to jail for a year. You, and other jury members voice that dilemma to the judge, who then instructs you to render a verdict based strictly on the facts of the case, the evidence presented, and that all other considerations have no bearing on your duty to render a verdict. What do you do? It appears that you have no choice, and you find her guilty.

But if you had actually been a FULLY INFORMED JUROR, rather than just listening to the instructions of the judge who owed his career to the Mayor, you would have known that you did have an alternative. That it was not actually illegal for you to ignore the judge’s instructions, and that you could have rendered a verdict based on your conscience rather than a law in a book. You would have known that Jury Nullification not only gives you this right, but that it is your duty as a juror to render your verdict in such a manner. In this way, you see, not only have you protected the accused from overzealous and tyrannical prosecution, but you have also struck a blow against cronyism. Cronyism by the Mayor who stands to make a profit from the law he made, in relation to the company stocks he owns and the companies that own him. Cronyism by police and prosecutors who turn a profit on the backs of the taxpayers for every arrest and prosecution they make, maintaining their job security and giving the United States the largest prison population in the world in the process.

http://www.copblock.org/29691/what-is-jury-nullification/

In its strictest sense, jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a Not Guilty verdict even though jurors believe the defendant has broken the law. Because the Not Guilty verdict cannot be overturned, and because the jurors cannot be punished for their verdict, the law is said to be nullified in that particular case.

In what can be said to be a milder form of jury nullification, some of the jurors, or even just one in most cases, can hang the jury by maintaining a Not Guilty verdict even though they believe the defendant broke the law. There is no requirement that jurors must come to a unanimous verdict. If the jury cannot unanimously agree on a verdict of either Guilty or Not Guilty, this is known as a hung jury. When further deliberation clearly will be unproductive, the judge will declare a mistrial. The prosecution may or may not retry the case in the future, but the law has at least been nullified in the trial at hand.

http://fija.org/document-library/jury-nullification-faq/what-is-jury-nullification/

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this post titanic1. It's information everyone should have and take on-board.

It should be self-evident that ONLY a FULLY INFORMED JURY can render a just verdict. If the jury doesn't have all of the facts and evidence, they cannot possibly come to a correct and just verdict.

The difficulty is the judges pressure the jurors into thinking they must accept their charge and instructions. A judge presiding over a jury trial was meant to be a referee ONLY and has no real authority over anyone despite the legal posturing to convince people otherwise.

In civil matters, each side will present their "charge" to the judge who then goes and makes up his own charge, supposedly from the other two charges and the evidence that's been presented, but that isn't necessarily the case. The charge is the list of instructions that will be given to the jury to coerce the jury into rendering the verdict the judge WANTS them to render. And given the judge is in complete control of what charge/instruction is given to the jury, a judge can not only manipulate the trial during it by intentionally suppressing key evidence, but the judge can also control the outcome of the trial AFTER all of the evidence has been presented, with nothing more than a list of instructions he/she makes up and hands to the jury (the judge's charge). Criminal matters follow similar rules.

So by definition, the judge's charge is actually jury nullification because it in effect nullifies the jury's authority and keeps the jury from doing what they are there to do: decide the matter FAIRLY AND IMPARTIALLY, based on ALL of the available facts and evidence. But as with most things in the legal system, the term jury nullification is "legalese" for something that means the exact opposite of its natural meaning. It would more aptly be called "judge nullification" because it nullifies the judge's ability to manipulate the case, at least after the facts and evidence have been presented.

There is a legal maxim that states "no one can judge in their own cause/case or in a cause/case to which they are party". This should make it crystal clear that every single judge today is a CRIMINAL because they ALL judge in their own causes and in causes to which they are party. They routinely decide both criminal and civil matters where they stand to profit depending upon their own ruling. We the people should unite and arrest these criminals and dissolve their criminal enterprises, i.e. their FRAUDULENT color-of-law admiralty courts that are masquerading as real courts of law. All courts in the U.S. today (with the exception of the court of claims in DC) are admiralty/statutory courts, operating in bankruptcy. That's why they fly a military flag in the courtroom (i.e. a gold-fringed US flag).

Across the pond and a few years back, a good friend of mine in a landmark case in the UK went through a perfect example of how corrupt the system really is, and in doing so provided a perfect example of how to defeat the evil system with Divine guidance.

John Anthony Hill was arrested under the charge "perverting the course of justice" for sending DVDs of his widely acclaimed film "7/7 Ripple Effect" to a UK court where a show trial of 3 terror patsies was underway. These 3 individuals were accused of aiding the 4 alleged bombers in the 7/7/2005 London bombings.

The 7/7 London bombings was the UK's version of 9/11; a false-flag/state-sponsored terrorist attack perpetrated by the government and its agencies. In less than an hour, the film completely dismantles the official government narrative, proving the 4 alleged bombers could not have possibly even been in London in time to carry out the bombings much less have been responsible for them.

Anyone interested in viewing the film, please find it below, or at the following link: http://jforjustice.net

So the DVDs of this film were sent to the judge and jurors IN CARE OF THE COURT in the ongoing trial of these 3 so-called "helpers" of the original 4 alleged bombers who were in fact innocent. Obviously understanding that the original 4 were innocent translates into the 3 "helpers" having done nothing wrong either, which is why the DVDs were sent to the court to pass on to the judge and jurors AS AN AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF. This is not only totally lawful to do, but knowingly withholding evidence in a trial is a crime.

There couldn't be a bigger travesty of justice than to arrest someone for sending an amicus curiae brief to the court to provide them with key evidence which would exonerate the defendants. But instead of being rewarded for doing what any of us should do in that situation, John Anthony Hill (JAH/Muad'Dib) was arrested for "perverting the course of justice", which carries up to a 20 year sentence.

The judge in the matter did his best to suppress evidence and tamper with the jury. The irony is the prosecution actually showed the "7/7 Ripple Effect" in the courtroom thinking it would convince the jurors JAH was a crazy "conspiracy theorist", but it had the exact opposite effect. The film is so compelling that 10 of the 12 jurors believed it to be true, which it is. Interestingly, JAH was able to enter into evidence that 9/11 was an inside job as well, and his testimony about Building 7 is now part of the official record in the UK. Great stuff.

Despite his incessant jury tampering attempts, the judge saw things weren't going the way he had hoped and made a desperate, last-ditch attempt to coerce the jury into rendering a guilty verdict. The judge actually tried to pervert the definition of the word "pervert" by telling the jurors that for the purposes of this particular case, the world "pervert" should be taken to mean "influence", i.e. if JAH meant to influence the outcome of the trial (positively or negatively) by sending the amicus curiae brief to the court to pass on to the judge and jury in that trial (of the 3 terror-patsies), then the jury needed to find him guilty of perverting the course of justice.

THAT is how corrupt the justice system really is and how desperate they really are to try to imprison freedom-fighters who are exposing their evil to others. Fortunately the jurors saw through the judge's final attempt to con them and found JAH innocent.

A real-life example of how the judge can try to UNLAWFULLY manipulate the outcome of a case through his charge to the jury, as well as a real-life example of how the Truth will ALWAYS prevail. If anyone is interested in further details about this case, please find them at the following link:-

http://mtrial.org 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you have to go to Jury Duty... Do yourself a Favor and dont tell anyone your name... Hi my name is Sid...lol. But anyways... When they call your name just pretend your asleep, and they will think your in the bathroom or elsewhere and move on to the next guy or gal...  and if you make it through the three day process you should be told thank you for your service and sent home... And about half a month later get your check in the mail...                       And i just had to add this LMAO!!!

 

Edited by Siddrix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up to our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now