Jump to content
Advertise With Us! Or Sign Up To Remove Ads!
Hello, readers! Please consider adding conspiracyoutpost.com to your adblock whitelist. Our ads support the development and upkeep of the site.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

roamer

White House claims on Syria chemical attack ‘obviously false’ – MIT professor

Recommended Posts

 roamer    855

The analysis of the WH claims is quite devastating. My next post contains a link to the full text and some info about the author of the report.

Quote

The report “contains absolutely no evidence that this attack was the result of a munition being dropped from an aircraft,” wrote Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Professor Theodore Postol, who reviewed it and put together a 14-page assessment, which he provided to RT on Wednesday.

https://www.rt.com/usa/384520-postol-report-sarin-syria/

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 roamer    855

The full text of the report is on scribd:

"A Quick Turnaround Assessment of the White House Intelligence Report Issued on April 11, 2017  About the Nerve Agent Attack in Khan Shaykhun, Syria"

https://www.scribd.com/document/344995943/Report-by-White-House-Alleging-Proof-of-Syria-as-the-Perpetrator-of-the-Nerve-Agent-Attack-in-Khan-Shaykhun-on-April-4-2017#fullscreen&from_embed

 

Some info about Theodor Postol, the author of that report:

Quote

A physicist, Postol is professor of science, technology, and national security policy at MIT. His expertise is in ballistic missile defense technologies and ballistic missiles more generally. Prior to coming to MIT, he worked as an analyst at the Office of Technology Assessment and as a science and policy adviser to the chief of naval operations. In 2001, he received the Norbert Wiener Prize from Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility for uncovering numerous false claims about missile defenses.

http://thebulletin.org/bio/theodore-postol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 roamer    855

A quote from the report:

Quote

No competent analyst would assume that the crater cited as the source of the sarin attack was unambiguously an indication that the munition came from an aircraft. No competent analyst would assume that the photograph of the carcass of the sarin canister was in fact a sarin canister. Any competent analyst would have had questions about whether the debris in the crater was staged or real. No competent analyst would miss the fact that the alleged sarin canister was forcefully crushed from above, rather than exploded by a munition within it. All of these highly amateurish mistakes indicate that this White House report, like the earlier Obama White House Report, was not properly vetted by the intelligence community as claimed.

https://investmentwatchblog.com/mit-professor-theodore-postol-just-published-a-14-page-document-questioning-white-house-claims-that-sarin-was-dropped-from-syrian-air-force-plane/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Jostler    2,216

The  "evidence" clearly does not  support  the  conclusions the US government  has  drawn from it.  Even much  lesser trained individuals than this professor can see it.  There is NO way Trump does not already  know this.

I am glad to see some  people  with the credentials and credibility to know what they're talking about stating  that clearly...  not trying to dismiss or reduce the importance of information like this...we need more of it.

But the tragedy is that in spite of crystal clarity, our government prefers the lies because they represent an excuse to move forward with the agenda that has long been planned.

We're being snookered .....again.   It was easy to ignore it  in the past because destroying millions of lives didn't really have much effect on us personally.   This time the consequences may end up in our back yards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jump To Top
×