Jump to content
Advertise With Us!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
RhetoricalRebel

Tillerson: China agrees on 'action' on North Korea as navy strike group sails

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

 RhetoricalRebel    1,065
Posted (edited)

As the US navy deployed a strike group towards the western Pacific Ocean, to provide a presence near the Korean peninsula, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said China agrees with the Trump administration that “action has to be taken” regarding North Korea.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/09/us-navy-strike-group-north-korea-peninsula-syria-missile-strike

So according to this, the talks with Xi were successful to the point they will not interfere between US and N.K. If conflict breaks out. A small sigh of relief ....... maybe. Not sure what to make of it.

Edited by RhetoricalRebel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 COBO Member    2,011

"If"...if that's the case, then it's time to go big or go home. As I've speculated before, it'll remain a conventional (non-nuke) strike since I'm certain China wants those NorK ports. I believe that's the deal cut with Xi.

But we have to hit every fixed and mobile launch facility first as well as try to shut down the artillery along the DMZ. Seoul will no doubt take some hits. And Osan AFB will surely be targeted. But if we do it right, casualties should be minimal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 RhetoricalRebel    1,065
5 minutes ago, COBO Member said:

"If"...if that's the case, then it's time to go big or go home. As I've speculated before, it'll remain a conventional (non-nuke) strike since I'm certain China wants those NorK ports. I believe that's the deal cut with Xi.

But we have to hit every fixed and mobile launch facility first as well as try to shut down the artillery along the DMZ. Seoul will no doubt take some hits. And Osan AFB will surely be targeted. But if we do it right, casualties should be minimal.

When you say "non-nuke", you think crazy Kim will be that rational? I hope so, but not confident.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 LuckyBolt    1,084

Damn, this is really happening.  They are going after Syria and NK at the same time? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 RhetoricalRebel    1,065
5 minutes ago, LuckyBolt said:

Damn, this is really happening.  They are going after Syria and NK at the same time? 

Invest in  military stocks and buy preps. :hiding:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Dan Lannon    371
30 minutes ago, RhetoricalRebel said:

 

So according to this, the talks with Xi were successful to the point they will not interfere between US and N.K. If conflict breaks out. A small sigh of relief ....... maybe. Not sure what to make of it.

Loosely translated:  as long as China can continue shipping endless containers filled with cheap inferior crap to Wal-Mart, they'll stand down and let the U.S. do as they wish with the "Little Plump One".  :coffeetime:

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 COBO Member    2,011
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, RhetoricalRebel said:

When you say "non-nuke", you think crazy Kim will be that rational? I hope so, but not confident.

That's why we have to be swift and savage with the first strike and take out all his launchers in the first minutes.

Edited by COBO Member

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 COBO Member    2,011
3 minutes ago, Dan Lannon said:

Loosely translated:  as long as China can continue shipping endless containers filled with cheap inferior crap to Wal-Mart, they'll stand down and let the U.S. do as they wish with the "Little Plump One".  :coffeetime:

Exactly. China wants those ports!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Dan Lannon    371
1 minute ago, COBO Member said:

Exactly. China wants those ports!

...and our consumers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 JustATrucker    441

We shall see, is all I can say.. If it does happen, then so be it..That little queer needs to go, and needed to go a long time ago..

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 RhetoricalRebel    1,065
4 minutes ago, COBO Member said:

That's why we have to be swift and savage with the first strike abd take out all his launchers in the first minutes.

I agree, but still a big gamble. Glad I live in Florida, Don't think he can reach that far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up to our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  1. Jump To Top
×