Jump to content
Advertise With Us!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
Talon

Loony Professors Suggest Parents Could Be Randomly Assigned Babies to End Racism

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

 Talon    716

It’s strange how people from academia can be so out of touch with reality.|

It often seems like the people who spend the most time pursuing an education, particularly if it’s not STEM related, have the most backward views of society and propose the most asinine solutions to non-problems. You’d think that people who put so much effort into trying to understand the world would have great ideas, but that’s not always true.

Case in point: Howard Rachlin, a professor of psychology from Stony Brook University and Marvin Franke, a professor of psychology at Sarah Lawrence College, have come up with a solution to end racism in America. In an op-ed for Aeon, they suggested (as a thought experiment of course) that the best way to stop racism and what they call “genetic chauvinism,” would be to assign babies randomly to parents, without their consent.

“The superficial connection between color and culture would be severed. Racism would be wiped out. Racial ghettos would disappear; children of all races would live in all neighborhoods. Any white child could have black parents and any black child could have white parents.” they said before adding “Imagine if social mixing had been in effect 100 years ago in Germany, Bosnia, Palestine or the Congo. Racial, religious, and social genocide would not have happened.”

What’s even more creepy than that, is what they think would happen to parents who refuse to go along with this policy, and raise their own children in secret. “But those babies would not have birth certificates, they would not be citizens, they could not vote, serve in public office and so forth. If discovered, the children might be taken away after the strong bonds of psychological (as opposed to biological) parenthood had been formed. Few Americans would risk these penalties.”

The professors admit this plan would be “politically impossible, perhaps even repellent.” They say it’s not a serious proposal, but their in-depth analysis of this idea sure sounds serious. Leftist academics are obsessed with ideas that break down the family and erase social and cultural boundaries, and this fits that bill. It sounds like a socialist wet dream that only an academic swimming in social justice notions would come up with.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos.

Contributed by Daniel Lang of The Daily Sheeple.

Daniel Lang is a researcher and staff writer for The Daily Sheeple – Wake The Flock Up!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 kbet    507

That is genocide. The forcible transfer of children between ethnic groups/races, according to the UN Convention on the Prevention of Genocide, is genocide. They violated the treaty, by merely advocating it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 DRUMZ    558

My take?

People with severe metal problems should still be allowed to write college papers, peer reviewed articles etc. etc....

Does not mean that anyone will ever take them seriously.

Peace and Love!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Scorpion    82
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Talon said:

Howard Rachlin, a professor of psychology from Stony Brook University and Marvin Franke, a professor of psychology at Sarah Lawrence College, have come up with a solution to end racism in America.

Why is it mostly Jews who come up with dumb suggestions like this one?

Is it related to their Holocaust complex, which has been driven into them since birth?  Why else would most of them want to break down the social structure & fabric of most every predominant white-Christian society?  

At least 90% of the ones that I run into in the big city I live in, are leftist race-mixing fanatics for everyone else, except their own.

Edited by Scorpion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Jostler    2,213

A move like that would certainly dramatically increase the number of 2 year olds for sale to pedophiles

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Ukshep    14,347
3 hours ago, Jostler said:

A move like that would certainly dramatically increase the number of 2 year olds for sale to pedophiles

And put kids at risk in general....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 apache54    3,118
15 hours ago, DRUMZ said:

My take?

People with severe metal problems should still be allowed to write college papers, peer reviewed articles etc. etc....

Does not mean that anyone will ever take them seriously.

Peace and Love!

 

Unfortunately they should NEVER be allowed to be a possible influence to our youth! it is bad enough we have LIBTARDs teaching in college, that is why we have so many libtards!    KIDS are easily influenced!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up to our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  1. Jump To Top
×