Democrats turn to 'faithless electors' in desperate, vain attempt to block Donald Trump presidency

[Cinnamon 16,288]

<snip>

Some desperate Democrats are now calling for a wave of faithless electors, insisting the 538 Chosen Ones must save the country from a President Trump. A citizens' petition on the White House website declares it is "incumbent on the present electors to remedy this existential imperilment to the Republic, moreover the planet, by choosing to elect Hillary R. Clinton to the Office of the President of the United States or any other such qualified candidate for that Office."

It's not going to happen. As of Thursday morning, the petition has barely more than 9,000 signatures. No electors from Republican states have declared they won't vote for Trump. (Before the election, a couple of Washington state electors said they might refuse to vote for Clinton if she won the state, which she did. "No, no, no on Hillary. Absolutely not. No way," said one of then, Robert Satiacum, a Bernie Sanders supporter.)

Still, many prominent politicians believe it's time to do away with the Electoral College. Said former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, a Democrat and a Clinton supporter:

"If we really subscribe to the notion that 'majority rules,' then why do we deny the majority their chosen candidate?"

<snip>

http://www.oregonlive.com/today/index.ssf/2016/11/democrats_turn_to_faithless_el.html

Just wanted to let you know it's floating around out there. 

[Quick1966 1,059]

12 minutes ago, Cinnamon said:

<snip>

Some desperate Democrats are now calling for a wave of faithless electors, insisting the 538 Chosen Ones must save the country from a President Trump. A citizens' petition on the White House website declares it is "incumbent on the present electors to remedy this existential imperilment to the Republic, moreover the planet, by choosing to elect Hillary R. Clinton to the Office of the President of the United States or any other such qualified candidate for that Office."

It's not going to happen. As of Thursday morning, the petition has barely more than 9,000 signatures. No electors from Republican states have declared they won't vote for Trump. (Before the election, a couple of Washington state electors said they might refuse to vote for Clinton if she won the state, which she did. "No, no, no on Hillary. Absolutely not. No way," said one of then, Robert Satiacum, a Bernie Sanders supporter.)

Still, many prominent politicians believe it's time to do away with the Electoral College. Said former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, a Democrat and a Clinton supporter:

"If we really subscribe to the notion that 'majority rules,' then why do we deny the majority their chosen candidate?"

<snip>

http://www.oregonlive.com/today/index.ssf/2016/11/democrats_turn_to_faithless_el.html

Just wanted to let you know it's floating around out there. 

I figured it would be the next hurdle. But you know what f**k them! The people have spoken and it's what WE want. Those lil snowflakes should pack their shit and leave if they don't like it.

[Cinnamon 16,288]

What is a faithless elector?

In United States presidential elections, a faithless elector is a member of the United States Electoral College who does not vote for the presidential or vice-presidential candidate for whom they had pledged to vote. That is, they actually vote for another candidate, or fail to vote, or choose not to vote.

[FlhxsGeek 55]

Evidently someone missed out on a few civics classes.  We live in a representative republic.  Majority rules mentality is what got us in this mess.  

[crabb]

2 minutes ago, Quick1966 said:

I figured it would be the next hurdle. But you know what f**k them! The people have spoken and it's what WE want. Those lil snowflakes should pack their shit and leave if they don't like it.

Just found this comment and thought I would share

“Sorry Snowflakes, But It’s Not Over…”

Deplorables Regrouping For The Next Attack

By Francis Marion

“It’s Nov 10th and it’s time to face the music. For those of you on the left I know it is hard. You are confused, bewildered and deeply, deeply saddened. Maybe even triggered. You probably missed work or school yesterday, called in sick or simply didn’t get out of bed. That’s ok though because your Indigenous Women’s Studies prof said it was ok to skip the exam today. Everyone is getting an A as a morale builder. So cheer up.

But unfortunately that doesn’t really explain anything. How did this happen? It wasn’t supposed to happen. But it did. How could the polls be so wrong? What about the entire media? How?

Well, here are a few theories that might help you see where some of your mistakes were made. First, and probably foremost, is just good old fashioned hubris. The idea that “we can’t be beat”. Arrogance mixed with confirmation bias is a dangerous thing in any type of conflict; physical or otherwise. Just ask General Custer. Things didn’t work out real well for him and for the same reasons.

This leads directly into another problem that often arises from hubris. That is: failing to understand your enemy.

It would interest you to know that I, the author of this piece, am not an American. That’s right. I’m not a Yank. I don’t reside in the USA and have no interest in doing so. That means, unlike my illegal immigrant counterparts currently residing in your nation, I didn’t vote. But like many who fall into the ‘basket of deplorables’ residing in the US I realized early on that the battle between Trump and Clinton was much more than simply a contest between two politicians for the presidency. At its core it was an ideological conflict between light and dark, truth and lies. It was a struggle for the heart of western civilization in general.

And while I’ve never considered myself much of a right winger, being more of a libertarian bent, I have found myself increasingly pushed and marginalized by the “enlightened and progressive” amongst you into the same camp with all sorts of deplorables, regardless of where they lived and what they called themselves. Nationalists, alt righters, anarchists, constitutionalists and so on and so forth all made for strange bedfellows but an effective team. Working on the premise that the enemy of my enemy is my friend we have all found common ground. We have you to thank for that. By pushing, badgering, harassing, marginalizing and insulting us on a regular basis you created something new. And it crushed you at the ballot box.

There were other factors as well. The pesky internet for example. It allowed those of us who could not vote to contribute in other ways. Through memes, leaks and general trolling we cheered and supported our freedom loving brothers and sisters in your country and encouraged them to have heart and stay the course. Of course, our part was small, miniscule really, compared to what our American brothers and sisters had to endure, but you get the picture.

Elections, especially ones mired in icky things like ideology and principle, now cross national boundaries. It sucks I know, but a lack of imagination on your part does not equal or represent a foul on ours. We did nothing illegal or immoral. We simply beat you because, well, we’re smarter than you are.

But not to worry. There will be plenty of opportunities for you to learn from your mistakes. You see, the battle that took place in your polling stations on the 8th of November was just that. A battle. We, the freedom loving peoples of the western world, well, we’re just getting warmed up. To quote the man: “You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet“.

So retreat to your safe spaces, grab your adult coloring books and put on a happy face my special snow flakes because regardless of whoever/whatever you are and regardless of what nation it is you reside in, we, the deplorables, are coming for you.”

- https://www.theburningplatform.com/

[Groove 1,433]

The little snowfakes need to just stfu sit down and calm down. Obama didn't win popular vote in 2012 if I recall correctly or at least i remember something like that. And of course we got stuck with him another 4 years.