Jump to content
Advertise With Us! Or Sign Up To Remove Ads!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Just Lookin

AJ caught in a lie

Recommended Posts

Just Lookin   
Just Lookin

Anyone recognise this child from his latest Clinton/pedo video?
http://is.4chan.org/pol/1478319584629.png

If Clinton is what we think she is, this loudmouth moron is trying to muddy the waters for us. With shit like this floating about as 'evidence',  the real evidence will be ignored.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just Lookin   
Just Lookin

Forgot to add the link for original vid. Sorry bout that.
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 CTTE    30
16 minutes ago, Just Lookin said:

Anyone recognise this child from his latest Clinton/pedo video?
http://is.4chan.org/pol/1478319584629.png

If Clinton is what we think she is, this loudmouth moron is trying to muddy the waters for us. With shit like this floating about as 'evidence',  the real evidence will be ignored.

This is what I love about the Internet, the BS does get found.  Do not believe everything, research!   And AJ, never thought he was credible in the least.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Jostler    2,216

the source is actually Hagmann, not AJ.  Which is a lot more surprising to me given that I expect AJ to play fast and loose with facts.  Hagmann not so much :/   There is a possible explanation.  Hagmann claims that picture came to him in paper form...  he says it was not communicated to him electronically so it's possible his supposed source is the dirty one.

Never the less...good catch.  It's obviously something questionable that's going on here at some level. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 CTTE    30
13 minutes ago, Jostler said:

the source is actually Hagmann, not AJ.  Which is a lot more surprising to me given that I expect AJ to play fast and loose with facts.  Hagmann not so much :/   There is a possible explanation.  Hagmann claims that picture came to him in paper form...  he says it was not communicated to him electronically so it's possible his supposed source is the dirty one.

Never the less...good catch.  It's obviously something questionable that's going on here at some level. 

Hagmann said it was tape covering the image, so he know what was under the tape, nothing pornographic.  He put the tape there to make it look like, 1, the girl had no pants on, 2, somebody's face was hidden above, and 3, trying to hide the identity of the child. HE put the tape on.  AJ should have asked to see what that tape in the upper right was covering, but he knew, the words PIANO LESSONS.

 

And AJ put it on HIS site, HE pushed it, so the source is AJ.  He needs to check out his sources before he publicizes it.  But he is all about the ratings, not the truth.  He is a piece of garbage.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×