Jump to content
  • Sign Up
Sign Up To Remove Ads! | Purchase An Ad Slot!


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies. Want this topic removed from the archive?


RELEASE: #PodestaEmails27

Recommended Posts

Proof of media spinning

Clinton emails, edited final memo with amendments


From:brentbbi@webtv.net To: john.podesta@gmail.com Date: 2015-03-07 18:38

John, what I would suggest is this aggressive response, led not by the Clintons or their operatives but by respected Democratic supporters.....

1. With predictable stories beginning about Republicans running for president using private emails themselves, Democrats friendly to HRC can say it is the height of hyprocrisy for Jeb Bush and others to criticize HRC for what they themselves have done, and call for disclosure of their private emails equal to what HRC is disclosing about hers, and....

2. Call on Republicans in Congress who are criticizing HRC to disclose their private emails as well, especially Republicans on committees investigating HRC. If they try to hide behind the Freedom of Information Act protection Congress voted for itself, say they should waive that exemption and disclose equal to what HRC is disclosing. Otherwise they should be asked what they are hiding and why they write special rules to protect themselves....

2 (a). Call for disclosure of private emails involving committee investigations, contacts with the media about congressional investigations classified information, attacks against political opponents relevant to Congressional business.

3. Call for any Republican on any committee investigating HRC that refuses to disclose their private emails to recuse themselves because of a conflict of interest.....

4. Whisper to friendly beat reporters that they do formal surveys of Congressional Republicans and publish the results in news stories by name. So if Rep. X is a Republican investigating HRC next to their name it would read they (refuses to disclose citing FOIA etc.... 5. Suggest to friendly editorial writers that they could write about this. I will myself in the coming week...... Brent


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Knowledge of channel being unsecure?

Re: Here's what I mentioned


From:john.podesta@gmail.com To: hrod17@clintonemail.com Date: 2014-08-19 16:04

Yes and interesting but not for this channel.

On Aug 19, 2014 9:22 AM, "H" <hrod17@clintonemail.com> wrote: > Agree but there may be opportunities as the Iraqi piece improves. > > Also, any idea whose fighters attacked Islamist positions in Tripoli, > Libya? > Worth analyzing for future purposes. > >

*From*: John Podesta [mailto:john.podesta@gmail.com] > *Sent*: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 09:19 AM > *To*: H > *Subject*: Re: Here's what I mentioned > > >
Hit send too soon. Meant to say Syria elements are vexing. >

On Aug 19, 2014 9:17 AM, "John Podesta" <john.podesta@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think we are headed down this path in Iraq, but the Syria elements are >>

On Aug 17, 2014 3:50 PM, "H" <hrod17@clintonemail.com> wrote: >> >>> Note: Sources include Western intelligence, US intelligence and sources >>> in the region...


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Anna James <aj66@nyu.edu> wrote:

> Hello John, Cheryl, Victoria and Jennifer - Although I continue to respond
> to people's sharing of their concerns about the Foundation and/or my
> father's world by telling them that 1) I hope they will share their
> experiences/concerns/hopes/fears with Victoria and her team candidly and 2)
> that it is critical that as we move to professionalize the Foundation for
> the future that professionalism starts with this process - people continue
> to share things with me. Although I continue to not respond or engage
> beyond what I outlined above, I do think - and my mother strongly agreed as
> a lawyer - that I should pass along to you Victoria and your team and to
> you John and Cheryl the below as more information (factual or suspected or
> imagined). Particularly in advance of what I understand will be an
> intermediate conversation with Doug tomorrow. I continue to want - and to
> try - to disintermediate myself from this muddle, edify the corporate audit
> and existential process we are in - while also being a responsible board
> member, daughter and person.
> In that vein, I was told or experienced the following since we had our
> meeting last week Victoria:
> - today that Doug reached out to someone at Harry Walker (who represents
> my father on all speaking arrangements), to ask for a full list of all his
> speeches, how much he was paid for each speech, and told the contact person
> at Harry Walker that all speeches should now go through him, not Terry
> Krinivic (the scheduler)
> - that Ilya physically saw/caught Justin a couple of days ago reading his
> bberry and loading the same spyware onto his computer that he loaded onto
> Bari's computer
> - a secret service agent told Marc (my husband) that Justin had asked
> another secret service agent to lie about the parking pass absurdity [we
> can talk about this really ridiculous anecdote offline]
> - multiple people shared with me how upset they were at hearing how Justin
> referred to my father in the last week - in very derogatory ways widely
> sadly
> - Oscar told my father he knows Justin reads his emails
> - my father was told today of explicit examples at CGI of Doug/ Teneo
> pushing for - and receiving - free memberships - and of multiple examples
> of Teneo 'hustling' business at CGI - and of people now having quit at CGI
> - that Doug told Jon Davidson he was never going to forgive him for not
> reporting that Dad met with John (ie you John) on Sunday and that how could
> Jon forget who he really worked for
> - Doug told Terry Krinivic she would never work again in this town if she
> didn't back him up on everything
> - Ilya believes Hannah and Justin have taken significant sums of money
> from my parents personally - some in expenses - cars, etc. - and others
> directly
> As ever, on some of the above I am sure there are three sides as my
> grandmother would say - his, hers and the truth. On others, it seems more
> clear. All of it makes me very sad. Thank you all for your help. The only
> people I am sharing the above with are you, my mother and my father. Please
> let me know as ever if you have any questions or advice.
> Thank you,
> Chelsea


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fwd: Sanders


From:slatham@hillaryclinton.com To: john.podesta@gmail.com Date: 2016-02-15 17:51

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Craig T. Smith <cts1996@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 7:49 PM
Subject: Sanders
To: Sara Latham <slatham@hillaryclinton.com>

My folks want to fight back and need some ammo.

This is what I kind of drafted up. Not for public dissemination but to
give them a theme and some facts.

Would like to get it out to my talkers but realize the implications.

My initial thought is that I am close enough that people would use but
rogue enough that I’m expendable if it turns into a shit storm.

Maybe you all have something else. Also could get folks to start
distributing in ways it doesn’t trace back to me.

Or you might think the whole thing is a piece of shit and should never be
seen, used or event discussed again.

Sending to you for John because if this got into the bureaucracy it will
never again see the light of day. Too much, too tough for that many people
who would have to “sign off” on.

Let me know.

Craig T. Smith

Senior Advisor

Hillary for America


The attachment on this one is all on bernie.... give it a read. good insight!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.