Jump to content
Sign Up To Remove Ads!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies. Want this topic removed from the archive?

SolidSender

Putin Dead --Says Ex-wife

Recommended Posts

 

rusjev.net/2015/03/27/lyudmila-putina-moego-muzha-davno-net-v-zhivyih

Putin Long Dead Says EX
Published on Jun 8, 2015
Putins ex came out in April 2015 to tell the world that he was replaced after he died. She was threatened with the death of their children if she refused to participate. She is coming out now but fears for her life and that of her children.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Lilly    91

Since there was no link to the alleged Die Welt piece posted within the body of that article, my guess is that it's just made up. And Putin's meeting for a chat with the Pope tomorrow so...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since there was no link to the alleged Die Welt piece posted within the body of that article, my guess is that it's just made up. And Putin's meeting for a chat with the Pope tomorrow so...

​How can there be a link if was spiked ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Lilly    91

When the story was written there should have been a link to the source. Even if the article has since been removed from Die Welt, the link to it should still be on that Russian article. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When the story was written there should have been a link to the source. Even if the article has since been removed from Die Welt, the link to it should still be on that Russian article. 

​unless it was written after the spike

 

 

** and "should" (should have been a link ) isn't the same thing as "did". [ should is assumption ]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Lilly    91

​unless it was written after the spike

 

 

** and "should" (should have been a link ) isn't the same thing as "did". [ should is assumption ]​

Yes, my assumption is that any journalist would include their source, yet they didn't. 

Written after the spike? Okay then, are we to assume that the only person in the world that saw that published article on a Major German news site, before it was pulled, was the author of the piece that you posted? If not, then where is the massive coverage of this event that would have been blowing up social media around the world in the moments after it was published?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Spikeing is even more effective now than it used to be .

The illusion of a free social media is just that ...illusion. Facebook & twitter all censor ....... even after the fact. 

Things can made to disappear .....not found in googlecache or the wayback machine.

Anyone with GLP experience knows that . Disappeared threads you know there ...and no evidence of it on google as well

 

http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e303/84-385/spike.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Lilly    91

No. That doesn't wash. Please don't equate that loony bin with  global social media and it's millions of users. I think some of them might have noticed their posts about Putin dying being memory holed.

Answer the question -

Written after the spike? Okay then, are we to assume that the only person in the world that saw that published article on a Major German news site, before it was pulled, was the author of the piece that you posted? If not, then where is the massive coverage of this event that would have been blowing up social media around the world in the moments after it was published?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.............where is the massive coverage of this event that would have been blowing up social media around the world in the moments after it was published?

 

​That's an assumption of yours ( """would have been blowing up""") ....and you are quite obviously wrong.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×