Jump to content
Sign Up To Remove Ads!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies. Want this topic removed from the archive?

Brio

Dr. Judy Wood 'How Directed Free-Energy Destroyed Twin Towers on 9/11'

Recommended Posts

Thomas Potter   
Thomas Potter

Here are ways to cover up Dr. Wood's research:

1.) Create and promote unscientific alternate forms of destruction.

2.) Promote her research and then find fault with it.

3.) Make personal attacks against her character.

4.) Marginalize her research and call it "voodoo science".

5.) Promote her research but misquote her and run it into the ditch.

6.) Ignore her research and evidence then call it a "theory".

7.) Say that you have read her book and find fault with it when you never did read her book.

8.) Create other faux groups like the "Sandy Hook Hoaxers" to keep people from asking the right questions and looking at the evidence Dr. Wood presents. This also creates distrust in our government and people that ask questions. If our government was responsible for 9/11, our government is the only way to reverse the damage it has caused. This is why Dr. Wood filed her Federal Qui-Tam lawsuit. Too bad the Truthers did not support it. The phrase, “use or or lose it” comes to mind. If the system is broken, then fix it. Otherwise, you are condoning the broken state that it's in. (The “we are change” characters, the “loose change” characters, and Richard Gage & Co. going to the AIA office with ambush video interview attempts are good examples.)  Ambush journalism does not solve problems; it covers them up.
 
If the “thousands of engineers” that Mr. Gage brags about had stood behind Dr. Wood's Federal Qui-Tam lawsuit, it would have been a lot harder for them to dismiss it... especially if they stood in and outside of the courtroom during the 8-minute “hearing” by the Court of Appeals.  After all, the written decision from that hearing did not refute Dr. Wood's collection of evidence and her conclusions from that evidence. The court actually acknowledge the law applied to Dr. Wood's case but admitted they were ignoring the law to dismiss the case!  Why were the Truthers satisfied with that outcome? Anarchy is not the answer and fixes nothing.

FETZER THE CLOWN

Popular theories about what destroyed the World Trade Center towers on September 11, 2001 are:

1 Fires from jet fuel and office materials weakened steel in the upper floors and the buildings collapsed

2 Conventional controlled demolition blew out supports at the base and the buildings collapsed

3 Thermite cut steel columns on virtually every floor and the buildings collapsed

4 Conventional explosives blew the buildings up

5 Mini-nukes blew the buildings up

Theories 1, 2 and 3 rely on gravity to bring the buildings down while the last two blow them up. Popular theories, yes, and dead wrong. Five facts scientifically documented in Ph.D. engineer Judy Wood’s comprehensive textbook (Where Did The Towers Go?) prove the popular theories false beyond any doubt whatsoever. Yes, I know it’s amazing. Who’d a thunk it’d be this easy?

THE FACTS:

    DEBRIS: What debris? There was so little debris from each 110-story building that there was no “pile” or “stack.” Rubble totaled less than a story. It was a football field as a survivor who emerged from Stairwell B, North Tower, exclaimed. No computers, toilets, and only one small piece from one Steelcase file cabinet were found. Some steel and mostly dust remained. Lack of debris on the ground from quarter-mile-high twin towers whispers “no collapse.” See Chapter 9.

    BATHTUB: A bathtub or slurry wall surrounded 70 feet of WTC subbasements to prevent the Hudson River from flooding the WTC and downtown. If each 500,000-ton tower had slammed into the bathtub in 10 seconds or less, the protective wall would collapse. Did not happen. Upshot? Collapses did not happen. See Chapter 5.

    SEISMIC IMPACT: “Had the towers collapsed, foundation bedrock would have experienced tremendous force hammering on it throughout the ‘collapse,’” writes Dr. Wood. Seismic instruments registered disturbances far too short in duration and far too small to record tower collapses. This was true of both the twin towers and 47-story WTC7. Again, no evidence of collapses. See Chapter 6.

    SOUND: There were no loud explosions, as established by videos, witnesses, and the official report of NIST. Nor were there loud screeches and screams from massive metal falling, colliding, scraping and collapsing on metal. See Chapter 6.

    DUST: Photos, videos and witness testimony show the towers turned to powder in mid-air. Tim McGinn, NYPD, said, “I was standing there for a couple of seconds thinking where the f**k is the tower? I simply couldn’t comprehend it.” The dust rollout was so enormous and thick it blocked out sunlight and left an inch or more of dust covering downtown. Much of it wafted into the upper atmosphere. The volume was incredible. Particles from dust samples were smaller than red blood cells and about the size of DNA. As for toxicity, researchers said the dust “recorded the highest levels we have ever seen in over 7,000 measurements we have made of very fine air pollution throughout the world, including Kuwait and China.” See Chapters 8, 9, 14-16.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Walk Softly    2,830
26 minutes ago, Thomas Potter said:

Here are ways to cover up Dr. Wood's research:

1.) Create and promote unscientific alternate forms of destruction.

2.) Promote her research and then find fault with it.

3.) Make personal attacks against her character.

4.) Marginalize her research and call it "voodoo science".

5.) Promote her research but misquote her and run it into the ditch.

6.) Ignore her research and evidence then call it a "theory".

7.) Say that you have read her book and find fault with it when you never did read her book.

8.) Create other faux groups like the "Sandy Hook Hoaxers" to keep people from asking the right questions and looking at the evidence Dr. Wood presents. This also creates distrust in our government and people that ask questions. If our government was responsible for 9/11, our government is the only way to reverse the damage it has caused. This is why Dr. Wood filed her Federal Qui-Tam lawsuit. Too bad the Truthers did not support it. The phrase, “use or or lose it” comes to mind. If the system is broken, then fix it. Otherwise, you are condoning the broken state that it's in. (The “we are change” characters, the “loose change” characters, and Richard Gage & Co. going to the AIA office with ambush video interview attempts are good examples.)  Ambush journalism does not solve problems; it covers them up.
 
If the “thousands of engineers” that Mr. Gage brags about had stood behind Dr. Wood's Federal Qui-Tam lawsuit, it would have been a lot harder for them to dismiss it... especially if they stood in and outside of the courtroom during the 8-minute “hearing” by the Court of Appeals.  After all, the written decision from that hearing did not refute Dr. Wood's collection of evidence and her conclusions from that evidence. The court actually acknowledge the law applied to Dr. Wood's case but admitted they were ignoring the law to dismiss the case!  Why were the Truthers satisfied with that outcome? Anarchy is not the answer and fixes nothing.

FETZER THE CLOWN

Popular theories about what destroyed the World Trade Center towers on September 11, 2001 are:

1 Fires from jet fuel and office materials weakened steel in the upper floors and the buildings collapsed

2 Conventional controlled demolition blew out supports at the base and the buildings collapsed

3 Thermite cut steel columns on virtually every floor and the buildings collapsed

4 Conventional explosives blew the buildings up

5 Mini-nukes blew the buildings up

Theories 1, 2 and 3 rely on gravity to bring the buildings down while the last two blow them up. Popular theories, yes, and dead wrong. Five facts scientifically documented in Ph.D. engineer Judy Wood’s comprehensive textbook (Where Did The Towers Go?) prove the popular theories false beyond any doubt whatsoever. Yes, I know it’s amazing. Who’d a thunk it’d be this easy?

THE FACTS:

    DEBRIS: What debris? There was so little debris from each 110-story building that there was no “pile” or “stack.” Rubble totaled less than a story. It was a football field as a survivor who emerged from Stairwell B, North Tower, exclaimed. No computers, toilets, and only one small piece from one Steelcase file cabinet were found. Some steel and mostly dust remained. Lack of debris on the ground from quarter-mile-high twin towers whispers “no collapse.” See Chapter 9.

    BATHTUB: A bathtub or slurry wall surrounded 70 feet of WTC subbasements to prevent the Hudson River from flooding the WTC and downtown. If each 500,000-ton tower had slammed into the bathtub in 10 seconds or less, the protective wall would collapse. Did not happen. Upshot? Collapses did not happen. See Chapter 5.

    SEISMIC IMPACT: “Had the towers collapsed, foundation bedrock would have experienced tremendous force hammering on it throughout the ‘collapse,’” writes Dr. Wood. Seismic instruments registered disturbances far too short in duration and far too small to record tower collapses. This was true of both the twin towers and 47-story WTC7. Again, no evidence of collapses. See Chapter 6.

    SOUND: There were no loud explosions, as established by videos, witnesses, and the official report of NIST. Nor were there loud screeches and screams from massive metal falling, colliding, scraping and collapsing on metal. See Chapter 6.

    DUST: Photos, videos and witness testimony show the towers turned to powder in mid-air. Tim McGinn, NYPD, said, “I was standing there for a couple of seconds thinking where the f**k is the tower? I simply couldn’t comprehend it.” The dust rollout was so enormous and thick it blocked out sunlight and left an inch or more of dust covering downtown. Much of it wafted into the upper atmosphere. The volume was incredible. Particles from dust samples were smaller than red blood cells and about the size of DNA. As for toxicity, researchers said the dust “recorded the highest levels we have ever seen in over 7,000 measurements we have made of very fine air pollution throughout the world, including Kuwait and China.” See Chapters 8, 9, 14-16.

 

Don't forget... they did find one of the hijackers passports!   Haha.  Straight set up and naive people believe cave dwellers in Afghanistan brought them down.  Now that is stupid.  I was one of them!  

I don't know what method was used to bring them down, but it's wasn't planes. 

1. Towers come down.  Investigation, which wasn't released for 15 YEARS says it was Saudis that did it. 

2. We go to war with Iraq and Afghanistan.  Makes perfect sense. 

3. The void we leave allows the administration to create ISIS (per leaked emails). 

4.  Now ISIS is used to terrorize the world and other countries have been able to clamp down.  We haven't yet, but I'm sure it's coming.  The never ending boogy man.  

5. Our government is NOT THE GOOD GUY!!!  Sure, "we the people" are... but we don't run the show.  

Picking a side... Good vs Evil, does not mean picking a country.

Let's keep debating about Trump and Hillary, though.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Cryptic Mole    4,520
6 hours ago, thedudeabides said:

Probably the dumbest theory yet. 

 

FYI, the Towers were on top of a massive underground mall and water works.  It all collapsed downward.

 

Gold vaults too.

Where has all of China's Gold gone?

Over 4 billion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Walk Softly    2,830
26 minutes ago, Cryptid Mold said:

It wasn't directed energy.

It was two directed planes. 

:lulz1:

HOLY shit!!!!!!  I see Nibiru in the last frame of this gif!!!  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Stan Hail    213

I tend to lean towards believing it was controlled demolition and jet liners. Other than as a way to get Americans to accept the patriot act a lot of financial records were destroyed in the collapse. The records that disappeared that I think may be of the most interest are the financial records of Enron which by chance  were at the security exchange commission in the infamous building 7 (those that weren't shredded at Arthur Anderson). They were being investigated at the time by the SEC and 9-11 was only one month before the  Enron Scandal became public knowledge.  If you investigate what all Enron was involved and possibly involved in it was a pretty shadowy firm known for unethical business practices. They had a lot of major players involved with them and were quite possibly the cleaning part of a major money laundering operation. Without those records it is now impossible to find out what exactly was going on, who all the criminals were and where the money was going. There are some very major players with ties to Enron that the destruction of that evidence quite possibly would have greatly benefited.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Walk Softly    2,830
1 minute ago, Stan Hail said:

I tend to lean towards believing it was controlled demolition and jet liners. Other than as a way to get Americans to accept the patriot act a lot of financial records were destroyed in the collapse. The records that disappeared that I think may be of the most interest are the financial records of Enron which by chance  were at the security exchange commission in the infamous building 7 (those that weren't shredded at Arthur Anderson). They were being investigated at the time by the SEC and 9-11 was only one month before the  Enron Scandal became public knowledge.  If you investigate what all Enron was involved and possibly involved in it was a pretty shadowy firm known for unethical business practices. They had a lot of major players involved with them and were quite possibly the cleaning part of a major money laundering operation. Without those records it is now impossible to find out what exactly was going on, who all the criminals were and where the money was going. There are some very major players that the destruction of that evidence quite possibly would have greatly benefited.

Don't forget the destruction of the offices in the pentagon that were investigating the $1.7 trillion missing. (not sure on the exact number atm, that was a guess)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Stan Hail    213
43 minutes ago, Walk Softly said:

Don't forget the destruction of the offices in the pentagon that were investigating the $1.7 trillion missing. (not sure on the exact number atm, that was a guess)

A large 5 sided building  and a jet hits it on the correct side in the perfect spot to destroy those records. What a coincidence. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thomas Potter   
Thomas Potter
19 hours ago, thedudeabides said:

Probably the dumbest theory yet. FYI, the Towers were on top of a massive underground mall and water works.  It all collapsed downward.

Oh Really? A bathtub or slurry wall surrounded 70 feet of WTC subbasements to prevent the Hudson River from flooding the WTC and downtown. If each 500,000-ton tower had slammed into the bathtub in 10 seconds or less, the protective wall would collapse. Did not happen. Upshot? Collapses did not happen. See Chapter 5 of WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?

Some individuals that post here seem to be victims of the “dumbing down” of our culture and why it's so easy for “the crew” to pull off a psyop of this magnitude. A hallmark characteristic of the dumbed down is a confusion between “evidence” and “theory.”

Another characteristic of the dumbed down is the belief they can evaluate a book they have never read. They also fail to question why they have been convinced by someone else not to read it. Instead, they just memorize the list of talking points they were given and strongly urged not to think independently. So of course they don’t realize just how easy it is to control and entire population by discouraging independent thought. When belief is preferred over fact, anything can be covered up. And all that is needed is a community organizer to issue people their opinions and a conditioned response. Another name for this is brainwashing. How else can someone be so convinced that “the answer is 27” when they don’t even know what the question is?

thedudeabides demonstrates that problem solving abilities are almost non-existent. The powers of suggestion have made this individual a believer, not a thinker. I wonder why thedudeabides thinks that the 14+ people emerging from Stairway B forgot they were crushed and forgot they were blown up and forgot they were cooked to death. I wonder why he thinks that Bible artifact doesn’t have burned pages even though it has solidified former “molten metal” on it? That is, the molten metal that flowed across the pages of the Bible artifact had to be cold (cold liquid) or else the pages would have burned or had burn marks! ;-) ?

♥The Miracle of Directed Energy Technology on 9/11♥

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
grav   
grav

Did all posters see the video? 3 buildings did not collapse. They evaporated. Steel beams became dust.

And only 2 airplanes made it happen. Sure.

Directed energy is the best answer I've seen. This technology that makes better sense than nukes.Tesla warned us. 

Because the teevee told people what they were seeing, that is the end of it. They saw it with their own eyes. Actually, their minds were hijacked that day. 

Proof that blanket mind control is relatively easy if you know how to do sleight of hand. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×