Jump to content
Sign Up To Remove Ads!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies. Want this topic removed from the archive?

AnonG

Earth’s Moon: A Perfect Artificial Construction Too Good To Be True??

Recommended Posts

 AnonG    25

 

 

(N.Morgan) We’ve seen recent theories that the moon isn’t real, but an artificially created by left over space debris from Earth.

This theory is proven incorrect in light of the current theory of gravity, indicating that a large objectcollects all loose material, leaving none for the formation of another large body. 

So far, none of the theories are particularly compelling due to the lack of evidence that neither Earth nor the Moon appear to have been physically altered by a close encounter that occurred in the distant past.

No debris in space indicate a collision in the past yet it seems that the Earth and Moon were developed during the same period.

 

More http://beforeitsnews.com/beyond-science/2015/05/earths-moon-a-perfect-artificial-construction-too-good-to-be-true-video-2449212.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest   
Guest

Science has said that the moon is at least eight hundred thousand years
older than the earth, and maybe even a bit more.

edit to add: Facts about the moon - Maybe even older than the Earth or the
Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old; moon
rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were
resting was at least another billion years older.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Barbarossa    39

Science has said that the moon is at least eight hundred thousand years
older than the earth, and maybe even a bit more.

edit to add: Facts about the moon - Maybe even older than the Earth or the
Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old; moon
rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were
resting was at least another billion years older.

​Who, exactly is "Science"?  Frasier Cain (http://www.universetoday.com/19599/age-of-the-moon/),  Charles Q. Choi (http://www.space.com/25331-moon-age-revealed-lunar-mystery.html), Jane J. Lee (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/04/140402-moon-formation-earth-age-space-science/), and an awful lot of astrophysicists disagree with "Science"!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest   
Guest

​Who, exactly is "Science"?  Frasier Cain (http://www.universetoday.com/19599/age-of-the-moon/),  Charles Q. Choi (http://www.space.com/25331-moon-age-revealed-lunar-mystery.html), Jane J. Lee (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/04/140402-moon-formation-earth-age-space-science/), and an awful lot of astrophysicists disagree with "Science"!

​Well unfortunately there's no way to prove or disprove any of it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×