Jump to content
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
Sign in to follow this  
AnonG

Earth’s Moon: A Perfect Artificial Construction Too Good To Be True??

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

 AnonG    25

 

 

(N.Morgan) We’ve seen recent theories that the moon isn’t real, but an artificially created by left over space debris from Earth.

This theory is proven incorrect in light of the current theory of gravity, indicating that a large objectcollects all loose material, leaving none for the formation of another large body. 

So far, none of the theories are particularly compelling due to the lack of evidence that neither Earth nor the Moon appear to have been physically altered by a close encounter that occurred in the distant past.

No debris in space indicate a collision in the past yet it seems that the Earth and Moon were developed during the same period.

 

More http://beforeitsnews.com/beyond-science/2015/05/earths-moon-a-perfect-artificial-construction-too-good-to-be-true-video-2449212.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest   
Guest

Science has said that the moon is at least eight hundred thousand years
older than the earth, and maybe even a bit more.

edit to add: Facts about the moon - Maybe even older than the Earth or the
Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old; moon
rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were
resting was at least another billion years older.

Edited by Cryptic Mole

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Barbarossa    39

Science has said that the moon is at least eight hundred thousand years
older than the earth, and maybe even a bit more.

edit to add: Facts about the moon - Maybe even older than the Earth or the
Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old; moon
rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were
resting was at least another billion years older.

​Who, exactly is "Science"?  Frasier Cain (http://www.universetoday.com/19599/age-of-the-moon/),  Charles Q. Choi (http://www.space.com/25331-moon-age-revealed-lunar-mystery.html), Jane J. Lee (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/04/140402-moon-formation-earth-age-space-science/), and an awful lot of astrophysicists disagree with "Science"!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest   
Guest

​Who, exactly is "Science"?  Frasier Cain (http://www.universetoday.com/19599/age-of-the-moon/),  Charles Q. Choi (http://www.space.com/25331-moon-age-revealed-lunar-mystery.html), Jane J. Lee (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/04/140402-moon-formation-earth-age-space-science/), and an awful lot of astrophysicists disagree with "Science"!

​Well unfortunately there's no way to prove or disprove any of it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up to our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  1. Jump To Top
×