Jump to content
Sign Up To Remove Ads!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies. Want this topic removed from the archive?

Rothbard

Is this the primary reason behind all of these recently orchestrated events? The U.S. Police Force

Recommended Posts

 Rothbard    2,256

This is the end of your "local" sheriff - if he isn't dead already. 

 

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/07/09/dallas-obama-federal-shootings/

President Barack Obama is harnessing the increasing attacks on police in Dallas — and the periodic shootings of people by stressed cops — to push his agenda to federalize state and local police forces.

“I want to start moving on constructive actions that are actually going to make a difference,” he said during his evening press conference in Poland when he was asked about the Dallas attack. 

Those actions, he said, would  be based on the recommendations of the panel that he picked after the 2014 street riots in Ferguson, Missouri. The panel offered “practical concrete solutions that can reduce — if not eliminate — the problems of racial bias,” Obama said. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 YourMom2    1,354
3 minutes ago, Rothbard said:

“I want to start moving on constructive actions that are actually going to make a difference,” he said during his evening press conference in Poland when he was asked about the Dallas attack. 

Constructive actions = bad for America

And WTF is he doing in Poland? Visiting the Soros clan?

The list of sorrows on his watch must be staggering.....probably topping the Bush crime family record.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about the decriminalization of me using my constitutional rights thereby reducing the need for police? 

17 minutes ago, YourMom2 said:

Constructive actions = bad for America

And WTF is he doing in Poland? Visiting the Soros clan?

The list of sorrows on his watch must be staggering.....probably topping the Bush crime family record.

He's in Poland for some secret NATO stuff. Got some Russians to provoke,  a World War to stage...busy, busy, busy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Cinnamon    24,411

If there is a way for them to cause sheriffs not to be elected officials anymore, that is a true danger.  That is the reason why they are the last bastion of freedom between us and the Feds, if the Feds try to do something illegal. However, Oregon standoff and the unconstitutional sheriff in that county showed us they really only have to get someone inside their pocket to negate all of that protection! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 YourMom2    1,354
1 minute ago, Cinnamon said:

If there is a way for them to cause sheriffs not to be elected officials anymore, that is a true danger.  That is the reason why they are the last bastion of freedom between us and the Feds, if the Feds try to do something illegal. However, Oregon standoff and the unconstitutional sheriff in that county showed us they really only have to get someone inside their pocket to negate all of that protection! 

It might work in the cities but there are still plenty of rural counties where the only law enforcement is the sheriff. Replace with military? Rural people don't take kindly to being locked down as witnessed last year in Texas with Jade Helm. This is a big ass state with lots of rural land NOT owned by the feds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Cinnamon    24,411
1 minute ago, YourMom2 said:

It might work in the cities but there are still plenty of rural counties where the only law enforcement is the sheriff. Replace with military? Rural people don't take kindly to being locked down as witnessed last year in Texas with Jade Helm. This is a big ass state with lots of rural land NOT owned by the feds.

It's the same way in California.  The outlying areas are where all the conservatives live. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 YourMom2    1,354
7 minutes ago, Cinnamon said:

It's the same way in California.  The outlying areas are where all the conservatives live. 

Oregon too. Not sure about Seattle. I'd say that the states with the most federal land would be the easiest for them to lock down (shown in red on the map) They already have armies there with the BLM and those super nice park rangers that got a nice allotment of ammo. The real surprise is Utah. What were those conservative Mormons thinking, giving up their land?

http://modernsurvivalblog.com/government-gone-wild/map-showing-stunning-extent-of-federal-controlled-land/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Cinnamon    24,411
1 minute ago, YourMom2 said:

Oregon too. Not sure about Seattle. I'd say that the states with the most federal land would be the easiest for them to lock down (shown in red on the map) They already have armies there with the BLM and those super nice park rangers that got a nice allotment of ammo. The real surprise is Utah. What were those conservative Mormons thinking, giving up their land?

http://modernsurvivalblog.com/government-gone-wild/map-showing-stunning-extent-of-federal-controlled-land/

Don't forget the 100 miles inland from the coast all the way around the nation is a Constitution free zone, so they've got this pretty much locked down. Grrrrrrrrrr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Quick1966    1,220
23 minutes ago, Cinnamon said:

Don't forget the 100 miles inland from the coast all the way around the nation is a Constitution free zone, so they've got this pretty much locked down. Grrrrrrrrrr

Wow really!? Well I guess the entire state of Florida is a constitution free zone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, let's take Nevada for example. Since I partially grew up there and still go back occasionally to visit friends and family.  

98% of the state is BLM,  but to "lock it down" is next to impossible. Nevada, especially places like Nye County,  has a long history of showdowns with the feds. 

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/18177-feds-vs-the-west

Not to mention the well organized  Patriotic Organizations that are located there:

http://www.constitution.org/mil/nv/mil_usnv.htm

Now, mix that with the shear size of Nevada:


Nevada has a total land area of 109781.18 square miles. This gives it an area rank of 7 (out of the 50 US states). Additionally, there is/are 7 square miles of water surface within its boundaries. It is mountainous,  and high plains desert for the most part, you have to know where the water is.

I'd like to see them lock Nevada down,  much less the entire country. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 Quick1966    1,220
6 minutes ago, octopus prime said:

Okay, let's take Nevada for example. Since I partially grew up there and still go back occasionally to visit friends and family.  

98% of the state is BLM,  but to "lock it down" is next to impossible. Nevada, especially places like Nye County,  has a long history of showdowns with the feds. 

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/18177-feds-vs-the-west

Not to mention the well organized  Patriotic Organizations that are located there:

http://www.constitution.org/mil/nv/mil_usnv.htm

Now, mix that with the shear size of Nevada:


Nevada has a total land area of 109781.18 square miles. This gives it an area rank of 7 (out of the 50 US states). Additionally, there is/are 7 square miles of water surface within its boundaries. It is mountainous,  and high plains desert for the most part, you have to know where the water is.

I'd like to see them lock Nevada down,  much less the entire country. 

I've said this before that the US is a logistical nightmare for any occupying force. But they could definitely lock down major metropolitan areas with ease. Thing is the vast majority of Americans live in or around big metro areas and I'm sure you know that all they'll have to do is stop the EBT/SNAP benefits and you can create chaos is minutes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×