Jump to content
  • Sign Up
Sign Up To Remove Ads! | Purchase An Ad Slot!

roamer

 Citizen
  • Content count

    2,302
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

roamer last won the day on July 17 2016

roamer had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1,099 Excellent

3 Followers

About roamer

  • Rank
    Forum Veteran

Personal Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Interests
    9/11
    Alien Abduction
    Breaking News
    Crop Circles
    Earth Changes
    Environment
    False Flag Operations
    Human Rights
    International Affairs
    Mars
    Natural Medicine
    New World Order
    Politics
    Religion
    Secret Societies
    Space Science
    Spirituality
    UFOs
    Weather Control

Recent Profile Visitors

2,282 profile views
  1. Without peer review the situation would be much worse. Nope. If that were the case, then the reviewer should write his own paper, because he understands even more about the topic in question.
  2. Furthermore only few people would read it because of its horrible content.
  3. From the same article: https://www.sott.net/article/386605-Footage-of-LSD-trialled-on-UK-marines-and-other-human-experiments-courtesy-of-Porton-Down
  4. I fully agree. That's the reason why I'm considering this topic from different angles, even if some possible explanations look far-fetched. Just wait until I'm throwing a link list about the "Electric Sun theory" into the mix ...
  5. For sure. That's the reason why I brought up chemtrails on the other thread. For example volcanic ash in the atmosphere has a very strong effect: http://www.volcanocafe.org/krakatoa-skies-when-the-sun-turned-blue/ https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/06/pictures/110617-volcano-eruption-ash-sunsets-chile-science-puyehue-volcanic/
  6. roamer

    GLP Going Down The Shitter??? PIC

    I fully agree. You can bring some ideas into the discussion here and there, but that's all.
  7. There is one problem: nearly every source mentions 9 signs of The Hopi Prophecies instead of 12 ... http://www.ancient-origins.net/myths-legends-americas/hopi-prophecy-and-end-fourth-world-part-2-002281 See also: http://www.alamongordo.com/9-signs-of-the-hopi-indians/
  8. I found a very unusual article on the MSM -- emphasis mine. By the way, you are reading properly: a scientist talked about "increased solar brightness over the past 20 years" ... https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2004/jul/18/20040718-115714-6334r/
  9. That's another possibility: chemtrails are a secret reaction of the governments to counteract the changing solar radiation.
  10. You are moving too fast -- leave the "why" question aside for a moment. What if the ozone depletion is worse than ever? Maybe they are just lying when they claim that the "ozone hole in the atmosphere over Antarctica is slowly healing." Now, that's a new conspiracy theory! https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/good-news-about-ozone-hole-even-better-you-think-ncna835971
  11. I take my comment back that you are jumping to conclusions. One reason is ... it is possible that I was misreading your statement. If we accept the mainstream explanation of the sun as a giant nuclear reactor, then we have to consider the arguments quoted below. But according to standard science, this temperature increase will take many millions of years -- therefore it can't be noticeable. It is for this reason that the usual reply from mainstream science is something like: nothing has changed, nothing to see here, move on. In this way you can use a noticeable change in the solar radiation as an argument against standard science: "according to mainstream science a change of the sun within a few decades can't happen, therefore science must be wrong here." https://stardate.org/radio/program/brighter-sun
  12. Composition of the earth atmosphere. Eventually due to chemtrails. Edit: ... or due to ongoing ozone depletion -- despite all official statements to the contrary.
  13. Thanks. I was sure that I didn't edit the quote, therefore I was really perplexed. Good idea. Usually I'm taking a look at the quotes I'm referring to, but I don't pay any attention to the headline mentioning the referred poster like "xy said:"
  14. roamer

    Gospel for May 26th

    Beautiful.
  15. Correct -- but I have no clue how it happened. I was referring to this quote below:
×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.