Jump to content
  • Sign Up
Sign Up To Remove Ads! | Purchase An Ad Slot!


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

224 Excellent

About dbeers02

  • Rank
    Honorary Poster

Personal Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

1,136 profile views
  1. That’s St. Louis for you. All kind of scum and low IQ voters . I wish that my great state of Missouri would just give St.Louis to Illinois so we could be done with it.
  2. I Cool. I'm near Kansas City. My off grid is south of Warsaw down towards Wheatland. The company I work for has a satellite office there. I come to Springfield to work there when they need help. I hope to be moving to Warsaw permanently soon.
  3. dbeers02

    And so it begins- Surrender your guns

    I know right? According to the statute, my Glock and most semi auto pistols are assault weapons now in the eyes of that board. Just wait until they try to confiscate someones guns and cops get shot. Then is could escalate quickly
  4. Residents of Illinois Village Have 60 Days to Surrender Guns Or Face $1000 a Day Fine https://www.infowars.com/residents-of-illinois-village-have-60-days-to-surrender-guns-or-face-1000-a-day-fine/ Residents of Deerfield, Illinois have 60 days to turn in their “assault weapons” or face fines of up to $1000 dollars a day. Earlier this week, the The Village Board of Trustees passed an ordinance which banned certain types of “assault weapons” and large capacity magazines, including the the Ruger 10/22, which can accept magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. Semi-automatic pistols that can hold more than 10 rounds have also been banned. Law enforcement and retired law enforcement members of the community are exempted from the ban. Residents will have to either sell the weapons, transfer ownership to someone living outside of the town, turn them into police or pay the exorbitant fines, which range from $250 to $1000 per day per gun. The deadline is June 13. Authorities justified the ban by pointing to the recent spate of mass shootings, including last year’s Sutherland Springs shooting, which was stopped by a man who used one of the very guns Deerfield has now banned. Writer Jack Burns predicts that some residents will refuse to follow the order or pay the fines, resulting in “major turmoil and arrests in the event of non-compliance.” Indeed, some residents have already vowed to disobey the ban. “There’s an ancient and honored American tradition called disobeying an unjust law…I have urged (people) to listen to their conscience and if so moved do not obey this law,” remarked Joel Siegel, a resident of Lincolnwood. Deerfield Mayor Harriet Rosenthal suggested that she was moved to bring about the ban by the words of students from the local high school. “Enough is enough,” Rosenthal said, adding, “Those students are so articulate just like our students. There is no place here for assault weapons.” Second Amendment advocates have vowed to fight the ban in court with the help of the NRA.
  5. dbeers02

    They know they're coming [Merged]

    Lets be real. What are we going to do? What is the Federal government really going to do? It will take hundreds of agents to stop them. The will crash the border and scatter like cockroaches. It will be near impossible to stop them all. Shoot them? We cant do that either. Do we arrest them, jail them, and try to deport them? Just the costs for that are ridiculous.
  6. Mine fell of my boat into the lake. Oops
  7. dbeers02

    Yay a year older

    Happy Birthday Shep! Hope you have many more.
  8. I think we are beyond that. I believe it is very close to the point where we take this country back....by force.