Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
Cinnamon

Hillary Clinton’s Backers Want Obama to Grant a Preemptive Pardon—To Prevent Her From Facing “A Martha Stewart Problem” (SMH!)

22 posts in this topic

With FBI Director James Comey’s statement this week that the massive investigation of possible criminality by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton could linger into the fall, some of her political advisers have become convinced that the best option for her would be to shut it down now, which could be accomplished ifPresident Obama would grant a preemptive pardon for any crimes she may have committed.

These two survived Bimbogate, Whitewatergate, Travelgate, Benghazigate and Impeachmentgate, but now they may be standing at the Gates of Hell.

“It would be a humbling experience for Mrs. Clinton to accept a pardon, but she and husband Bill have ridden out terrible scandals in the past without losing their bedrock constituencies,” an official close to the campaign told Orbmagazine. “And without a pardon, the possible scenarios she is facing are fraught with danger.”

You may have noticed a look of fear in the candidate’s face in the past two weeks, and it’s not just because she has lost seven straight contests to Senator Bernie Sanders.  It’s also because the yearlong investigation by 147 FBI agents into her use of a home-brew unsecured e-mail server to send and receive classified national security information, as well as the possible intermingling of Clinton Foundation fundraising with her government largesse, is drawing to a close.

Mrs. Clinton will soon be interviewed under oath about these matters, and if her testimony doesn’t match up with that of others, she could be charged with lying to an FBI agent, which is a felony. The man she hired to set up and monitor the secret server (and then kept on the State Department payroll throughout her tenure),Bryan Pagliano, has been granted immunity from prosecution by the Department of Justice. He has now been exhaustively questioned and debriefed about the details of this clandestine undertaking. If it turns out that he lied to the agents, his immunity would be nullified, so it is likely he told the truth. But how will Hillary know what story to tell the FBI without Pagliano’s collusion and cooperation with her—and he is, at the moment, off the reservation. Plus, other of Mrs. Clinton’s underlings at State have been questioned under oath, and who knows what Clinton secrets they have revealed to the Bureau? It puts her in danger.

<SNIP>

http://www.orbmagazine.com/the-orbiter/hillary-clintons-backers-want-obama-to-grant-a-preemptive-pardon-to-prevent-her-from-facing-a-martha-stewart-problem/

Really?  I kept looking for a notification on the link above to see if that was satire. If you find one, please let me know. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Apparently this was already thought of:

http://nypost.com/2015/03/18/why-doesnt-obama-just-pardon-hillary/

It seemed like I remember a cartoon where Bill was pardoning Hillary way back when on a previous number of scandals.  Hillary goes "thanks Bill". "You're welcome Hillary". 

Bill was first pardoned convicted felon to be president.  Then he has pardongate.  Funny isn't it?

Edited by counterintelligence

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, counterintelligence said:

Apparently this was already thought of:

http://nypost.com/2015/03/18/why-doesnt-obama-just-pardon-hillary/

It seemed like I remember a cartoon where Bill was pardoning Hillary way back when on a previous number of scandals.  Hillary goes "thanks Bill". "You're welcome Hillary". 

Bill was first pardoned convicted felon to be president.  Then he has pardongate.  Funny isn't it?

Silver lining, Democratic party is hella Affirative action. They put a convict and a black man in the highest seat in the land. Love em or hate, that's bold.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course that's what they want. Idiot dems could care less if she's a criminal and that is precisely why America is lost. This country is broke why does the gov always want to throw money at a problem and expect it to get fixed. Also I think I read somewhere yesterday that there is 11 or 12 states where more than 50% of the population of those stars are on some type of welfare. About 10 more states and we're done imho. As for killary she is a freaking criminal with a long list of dead bodies behind her and bill, she constantly lies and causes more peoblems for America than fixes. A win for killary is death to America. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hillary didn't break the law, so the article is just fake news.  No pardon will be necessary for our future Madame President.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Frankenstein said:

Hillary didn't break the law,

How do you know that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Brio said:

How do you know that?

Because it's already been proven that her scandals were all trumped up garbage from the conservatives in congress trying to sabatoge her run for president.

They have nothing, or they would have pressed charges, but instead they made it a media circus. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Frankenstein said:

Because it's already been proven that her scandals were all trumped up garbage

How could it be already proven when she hasn't even been charged yet?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Brio said:

How could it be already proven when she hasn't even been charged yet?

Because she won't be charged.  They've had plenty of time to bring up charges, which just shows that it was all fake from the beginning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Frankenstein said:

Because she won't be charged.  They've had plenty of time to bring up charges, which just shows that it was all fake from the beginning.

That makes no sense."They have plent of time to bring up charges".That statment right there means there is is factual evidence to convict her of a crime.hence you do the whole investigation and then bring charges.Ussually when their is not evidence of a crime,they are quick to make a an arrest and the person walks.This is not a good sign for ur crooked leader.HILLARY FOR PRISON 2016!!!????????

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Restore formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor


Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.