Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
puddle

WTCs 1,2 & 7 were brought down by controlled demolitions

33 posts in this topic

The science surrounding the destruction of the three tallest WTC towers is indisputable. They were all brought down by controlled demolitions.

Consensus 911 can answer any and all questions anyone might have about the events of 911. It's done in a scientific manner, unlike the NIST investigation which was the very antithesis of the scientific process.

================================

Consensus 911: The 9/11 Best Evidence Panel

The 23-member 9/11 Consensus Panel is building a body of evidence-based research into the events of September 11, 2001. This evidence -- derived from a standard scientific reviewing process -- is available to any investigation that may be undertaken by the public, the media, academia, or any other investigative body or institution. The Panel regularly features selected excerpts from its Consensus Points, with links to full supporting documentation.

http://www.consensus911.org/

Click on "The 9/11 Consensus Points ↓" at the left.

=================================

 

Ever wonder about the molten steel found at the WTC sites. Find out everything you need to know at,

Point TT-6: The Claim that There Was No Molten Steel or Iron in the WTC
Point TT-6: Buildings

http://www.consensus911.org/point-tt-6/

 

Yup, everything you ever wanted to know about 9/11, but are too terrified to ask, can be found at the above mentioned website.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No.  They weren't demolished in a controlled demolition, they were disintegrated & pulverized into dust.... the steel was that is.  A controlled demolition wouldn't disappear just about all of the steel beam debris. 

Stick with the official alternative CT version that leads nowhere if you want.  Keep "calling for a new investigation" for another 15 years and see if anyone answers that call.   Find a controlled demolition that starts at the top and goes to the bottom, and see if it looks anything like the WTC towers that day. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In related news:

 

"A few days ago, AE911Truth received the results of our new nationwide survey, which we commissioned the online polling firm YouGov to perform as an update to our 2013 survey. The numbers are simply astounding:
 

After seeing video of Building 7’s collapse from four different angles, a staggering 55% of those surveyed suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition, compared to only 21% who suspect it was caused by ordinary fires;

 

Forty-nine percent are more inclined to believe critics of the official story who argue that only explosives can account for Building 7’s collapse. Just half that number — 24% — are more inclined to believe the government’s conclusion that fires are to blame;

 

And finally, a whopping 3-to-1 majority (48% to 17%) say they support a new investigation over those who oppose it!"

http://rethink911.org/news/new-poll-finds-most-americans-open-to-alternative-911-theories/#pagecontent

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if it was a mix of controlled demolition with some new explosive.(mini nukes)just throwin this out there!!because its looks like a controlled demolition.but the buildings and steel and people are dust and then the planes are fluckiimg holograms!!!its a huge fluckin mess that one is!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, yaknow said:

What if it was a mix of controlled demolition with some new explosive.(mini nukes)just throwin this out there!!because its looks like a controlled demolition.but the buildings and steel and people are dust ...

Actually, funny that you should mention that.

Quote

Bremer was on the international advisory board for the Japanese mining and machinery company, Komatsu. At the time, Komatsu had been involved in a joint venture agreement with Dresser Industries, the oil-services/intelligence front in which Prescott Bush Sr. and George H. W. Bush got their start with Neil Mallon. The Komatsu-Dresser mining division operated from 1988 to 1997. In July 1996, it patented a thermite demolition device that could "demolish a concrete structure at a high efficiency, while preventing a secondary problem due to noise, flying dust and chips, and the like." [25] Residues of thermite, the highly energetic chemical mixture, have been confirmed in samples of the WTC dust, and the use of thermite at the WTC was also revealed by environmental data.

http://www.911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p1.html

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There existed at the WTC site, many things that, legitimately, could not have been there, should not have been there. This one fact alone clearly illustrates that WTCs 1, 2 & 7 were controlled demolitions.

 

9/11 Experiments: The Mysterious "eutectic steel"

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, puddle said:

There existed at the WTC site, many things that, legitimately, could not have been there, should not have been there. This one fact alone clearly illustrates that WTCs 1, 2 & 7 were controlled demolitions.

 

9/11 Experiments: The Mysterious "eutectic steel"

 

Great vid. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, Flat.

He, Jonathon Cole, has many of them. As he says, the only way to resolve conflicting/competing ideas/theories is by experimentation.

In the following short video, he addresses the Trenton Tye video that was recently posted to YouTube. It received a lot of views, with some publications, that really ought to know better, leaping on the same major moronic bandwagon that Mr Tye hitched his dog and pony to and trotted it out on the internet. 

For the Undying 9/11 MORONIC Replies

 

For anyone who hasn't seen the original Trenton Tye video, here it is.

For the undying 9/11 MORONIC JET FUEL ARGUMENT

 

This is the Trenton Tye video that Mr Cole addresses in the first video in this post. The issue isn't, never was, that jet fuel can melt steel, for it most certainly cannot. The central issue is that THERE WAS melted steel, in a location where there was no legitimate fuel source available that could have done that.

"legitimate", meaning a fuel that was normally and regularly found in steel framed office buildings. Any fuel source that was able to melt steel, and remember, there was molten steel, was an illegitimate, illegally placed fuel source that SHOULD NOT have been there. 
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know who said it first but, paraphrased,

The only people who believe the official, government story of 9/11 are those who don't know the official, government story.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Restore formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.