Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
rbear

Moslems Outbreeding Whites in Sydney

4 posts in this topic

Legal immigration is allowing nonwhite Muslims from the Middle East to rapidly outbreed whites in the Australian city of Sydney, the state capital of New South Wales, a new fertility map survey of the most populous city in Australia has confirmed.

Muslims demonstrate in down town Sydney.

The “fertility map,” drawn up by social research company McCrindle, showed that many of the most fertile suburbs in Sydney are located in migrant clusters such as Lakemba, Auburn, Guildford, Punchbowl, and Bankstown—all popular with “families of Middle Eastern background.”

The appearance of the report was timed with official projections that Australia’s population will hit the 24 million mark next week, with the increase being almost solely due to legal nonwhite immigration from the Middle East and Asia.

The Australian Daily Telegraph marked the occasion by publishing an interview with the well-known neocon “conservative” writer from Canada, Mark Steyn, who often appears on shows such as those of Rush Limbaugh, Hugh Hewitt, and Sean Hannity.

According to the Daily Telegraph article, titled “Migrant birthrates are changing Australia: Average birthrate below replacement level,” the replacement of white people with Third Worlders in Australia is the “biggest story of our times, but political correctness has stifled debate so badly that politicians are too afraid to even talk about it.” cont

also see thread below:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, Australia wasn't a white continent to begin with.

Britain used Australia as a dumping ground for it's undesirables, without regard for the indigenous population already there.

Also, why be concerned about the skin color of a population?  Evolution created white skin before, and it will do so again over time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Frankenstein said:

Well, Australia wasn't a white continent to begin with.

Britain used Australia as a dumping ground for it's undesirables, without regard for the indigenous population already there.

Also, why be concerned about the skin color of a population?  Evolution created white skin before, and it will do so again over time.

Because white genocide is the agenda. Not many want to talk about it, as long as they keep getting paid well. They don't want the "racist" thing that goes along with talking about it. Also depending on how far you want to go back, whites have been exterminated anywhere from 3-7 times from the planet before. This time, whites will not "respawn" as before, its preserve your heritage/bloodline/lineage/whiteness or have future dna corrupted by race mixing leading to the end of white people over time. 

Did you know just mixing 1 african and 1 white person (for babies), if not pure is injected into the bloodline each time (3 generations after), the dna is corrupted so bad it doesn't produce offspring?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

5 hours ago, rbear said:

Did you know just mixing 1 african and 1 white person (for babies), if not pure is injected into the bloodline each time (3 generations after), the dna is corrupted so bad it doesn't produce offspring?

Ummm.... No I didn't and what exactly do you mean? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Restore formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.