Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
CGK

Water Found On Mars Again and Again and Again....

40 posts in this topic

Here is an article from NASA dated December 2006!

 

NASA Images Suggest Water Still Flows in Brief Spurts on Mars

December 6, 2006

 
 

 

NASA photographs have revealed bright new deposits seen in two gullies on Mars that suggest water carried sediment through them sometime during the past seven years.

"These observations give the strongest evidence to date that water still flows occasionally on the surface of Mars," said Michael Meyer, lead scientist for NASA's Mars Exploration Program, Washington.

Liquid water, as opposed to the water ice and water vapor known to exist at Mars, is considered necessary for life. The new findings heighten intrigue about the potential for microbial life on Mars. The Mars Orbiter Camera on NASA's Mars Global Surveyor provided the new evidence of the deposits in images taken in 2004 and 2005.

"The shapes of these deposits are what you would expect to see if the material were carried by flowing water," said Michael Malin of Malin Space Science Systems, San Diego. "They have finger-like branches at the downhill end and easily diverted around small obstacles." Malin is principal investigator for the camera and lead author of a report about the findings published in the journal Science.

The atmosphere of Mars is so thin and the temperature so cold that liquid water cannot persist at the surface. It would rapidly evaporate or freeze. Researchers propose that water could remain liquid long enough, after breaking out from an underground source, to carry debris downslope before totally freezing. The two fresh deposits are each several hundred meters or yards long.



Image left: A new gully deposit in a crater in Terra Sirenum. Image credit: NASA/JPL/Malin Space Science Systems


The light tone of the deposits could be from surface frost continuously replenished by ice within the body of the deposit. Another possibility is a salty crust, which would be a sign of water's effects in concentrating the salts. If the deposits had resulted from dry dust slipping down the slope, they would likely be dark, based on the dark tones of dust freshly disturbed by rover tracks, dust devils and fresh craters on Mars.
Mars Global Surveyor has discovered tens of thousands of gullies on slopes inside craters and other depressions on Mars. Most gullies are at latitudes of 30 degrees or higher. Malin and his team first reported the discovery of the gullies in 2000. To look for changes that might indicate present-day flow of water, his camera team repeatedly imaged hundreds of the sites. One pair of images showed a gully that appeared after mid-2002. That site was on a sand dune, and the gully-cutting process was interpreted as a dry flow of sand.

More NASA BS here:

https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/mars/news/mgs-20061206.html

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got a great idea, let's fund a space program and let the illunatics and all their evil entourage go colonize Mars. Bon-voyage creepshow's! Now that's some nasa funding I'd approve of.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/22/2015, 7:09:25, WhiteHorse said:

I've got a great idea, let's fund a space program and let the illunatics and all their evil entourage go colonize Mars. Bon-voyage creepshow's! Now that's some nasa funding I'd approve of.   

I'd fund that kind of operation as well.  Good riddance to sadistic lunatics.  Problem is that wouldn't really take them that far away from us.  As you can see in one of the photos above, "Mars" seems to be located in the northern (FE center) area of our Earth...

Mars?

http://40.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lzsxe0Lud11qz5va1o1_1280.jpg

Sunrise near north pole - Earth....

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Sunrise_over_sea_ice_near_the_North_Pole.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sunrise_over_sea_ice_near_the_North_Pole.jpg

Come on peeps, this stuff is easy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/22/2015, 8:30:44, JibbyJedi said:

I'd fund that kind of operation as well.  Good riddance to sadistic lunatics.  Problem is that wouldn't really take them that far away from us.  As you can see in one of the photos above, "Mars" seems to be located in the northern (FE center) area of our Earth...

Mars?

http://40.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lzsxe0Lud11qz5va1o1_1280.jpg

Sunrise near north pole - Earth....

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Sunrise_over_sea_ice_near_the_North_Pole.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sunrise_over_sea_ice_near_the_North_Pole.jpg

Come on peeps, this stuff is easy.

I was thinking the same thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/22/2015, 8:30:44, JibbyJedi said:

I'd fund that kind of operation as well.  Good riddance to sadistic lunatics.  Problem is that wouldn't really take them that far away from us.  As you can see in one of the photos above, "Mars" seems to be located in the northern (FE center) area of our Earth...

Mars?

http://40.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lzsxe0Lud11qz5va1o1_1280.jpg

Sunrise near north pole - Earth....

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Sunrise_over_sea_ice_near_the_North_Pole.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sunrise_over_sea_ice_near_the_North_Pole.jpg

Come on peeps, this stuff is easy.

Are you claiming my image is a sunrise? If so, its not. It's a sunset on mars. And yes, my image is of mars. Of that I have no doubt!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you claiming my image if a sunrise? If so, its not. It's a sunset on mars.

Well that changes everything then, lol.

The point is, 34 million miles further away from the sun "should" change the perspective size of the sun, or am I making a crazy assumption in that concept?  How come the sun is exactly the same size from Earth as it is from Mars? 

Once you've crossed that NASA fakery bridge, and know, not just believe that they are full of shit, seeing how they fake things comes fairly easy afterward.   The north pole, center of the FE model, is apparently a mild climate for some strange reason.  Even admiral Byrd talked about that in both the Hollow & Flat Earth research.

Does the location of where we are on the Earth determine the perspective size of the sun to us?  That wouldn't really make sense in the Heliocentric model, the sun should appear the one size at the north pole or at the equator, the bright glow of it though will change depending on where you're at and the time of day, but size should remain the same...... if 93 million miles away that is.

 

Edited by JibbyJedi
i hate typing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen the Moon at least this big many times.
Apparent size means nothing.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Restore formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead


Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.