Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
AceMan

More on the Europe subject

5 posts in this topic

On yahoo, a question was "why does the USA only pick on countries that it knows, or thinks it can defeat".
Here's my answer.

1. Because the westernized countries
(white countries) are all united and all friends, and they are the only ones in the world besides South Korea and Japan, who has the technology to take on the USA.
And the white western world could, and would gang up on the USA and nuke New York, if the USA messed with a white country, without the backing of the white western world, such as the case in world war 2.

2. The white western world in its state of being united is a significantly larger economy than the USA is by itself...
And the USA doesn't produce enough goods to supply its population without imports.

3. The USA's military weapons are far too expensive, and in too short of a supply to throw against the utterly destructive wrath of the western white world's high quality, well engineered, well produced weaponry, in the hands of white westernized, educated and trained soldiers.

4. The USA's Military weapons are far more disadvantaged than what the Campaigning politicians scream and yell about how great they are.

That's why.
That's the Answer.

 

And here's a not very exhaustive list of the capable weapon systems sported by European militaries and their operational qualities.

 

Bae Systems.

Maker of the Chobham Armor that the Abrams tank uses, and the Challenger 2 has the better (but classified) chobham armor arrangement, and its gun is arguably better than the Abrams gun.
1, The Gun of the challenger 2 is rifled, yielding significantly more accurate Trajectory.
2. The rounds that the Challenger 2 fires are a mix of ammo, Depleted Uranium and Tungsten, giving it great power...
But its also 15 entire Millimeters narrower in diameter than the rounds the USA fires..
Also increasing both speed and accuracy.
105 vs 120

2. Krauss Maffei Wegmann's Leopard 2 Tank.
Unlike the Abrams, the Leopard 2 A5, A6 and A7 tanks can travel under water if necessary, and it has the L55 Gun, vs the Abrams comparatively outdated L44.
More countries also use the Leopard 2, compared to the Abrams.

The Same company's PzH 2000 howitzer can Deliver TEN, 160mm rounds in one single place in a very short time, in a mode called "MRSI" Multiple Round Simultaneous Impact, from a distance of up to 100 Miles.
its also a fast mover.
It can be completely packed up and gone before the rounds have even met their targets.

3. The Eurofighter Typhoon is revered by the US Air Force.
Its Avionic combat electronic systems are equal in capability to the F35 JSF.
Its a twin Rolls Royce engine, delta wing, with Nose flaps.
Its nearly a Mach 3 fighter, with the most maneuverability in jet aviation history.

 

4. The Krauss Maffei Wegmann company's Dingo 2 operates the same exact way, for the same purposes as the Humvee,  But the Dingo 2 is a lot more survivable, more comparable to a 40,000 pound MRAP, more so than the Humvee.

The Oerlikon is Fully Automatic, whereas the American Bushmaster competitor is semi Automatic.

 

5.Colt's accuracy can't be denied... but it isn't Unique and more modern and rugged designs surpassed it.

6. The Eurocopter NH90 is more survivable (and modern) the Blackhawk.

 

Combined between all the countries of Europe,  The Pan-European countries sport 5 Aircraft carriers,  Two Super carriers (as of 2020),  One 40,000 Ton Nuclear CVN, and Two small carriers, and about a Dozen large nuclear powered submarines that launches nuclear ballistic missiles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On yahoo, a question was "why does the USA only pick on countries that it knows, or thinks it can defeat".
Here's my answer.

1. Because the westernized countries
(white countries) are all united and all friends, and they are the only ones in the world besides South Korea and Japan, who has the technology to take on the USA.
And the white western world could, and would gang up on the USA and nuke New York, if the USA messed with a white country, without the backing of the white western world, such as the case in world war 2.

2. The white western world in its state of being united is a significantly larger economy than the USA is by itself...
And the USA doesn't produce enough goods to supply its population without imports.

3. The USA's military weapons are far too expensive, and in too short of a supply to throw against the utterly destructive wrath of the western white world's high quality, well engineered, well produced weaponry, in the hands of white westernized, educated and trained soldiers.

4. The USA's Military weapons are far more disadvantaged than what the Campaigning politicians scream and yell about how great they are.

That's why.
That's the Answer.

 

And here's a not very exhaustive list of the capable weapon systems sported by European militaries and their operational qualities.

 

Bae Systems.

Maker of the Chobham Armor that the Abrams tank uses, and the Challenger 2 has the better (but classified) chobham armor arrangement, and its gun is arguably better than the Abrams gun.
1, The Gun of the challenger 2 is rifled, yielding significantly more accurate Trajectory.
2. The rounds that the Challenger 2 fires are a mix of ammo, Depleted Uranium and Tungsten, giving it great power...
But its also 15 entire Millimeters narrower in diameter than the rounds the USA fires..
Also increasing both speed and accuracy.
105 vs 120

2. Krauss Maffei Wegmann's Leopard 2 Tank.
Unlike the Abrams, the Leopard 2 A5, A6 and A7 tanks can travel under water if necessary, and it has the L55 Gun, vs the Abrams comparatively outdated L44.
More countries also use the Leopard 2, compared to the Abrams.

The Same company's PzH 2000 howitzer can Deliver TEN, 160mm rounds in one single place in a very short time, in a mode called "MRSI" Multiple Round Simultaneous Impact, from a distance of up to 100 Miles.
its also a fast mover.
It can be completely packed up and gone before the rounds have even met their targets.

3. The Eurofighter Typhoon is revered by the US Air Force.
Its Avionic combat electronic systems are equal in capability to the F35 JSF.
Its a twin Rolls Royce engine, delta wing, with Nose flaps.
Its nearly a Mach 3 fighter, with the most maneuverability in jet aviation history.

 

4. The Krauss Maffei Wegmann company's Dingo 2 operates the same exact way, for the same purposes as the Humvee,  But the Dingo 2 is a lot more survivable, more comparable to a 40,000 pound MRAP, more so than the Humvee.

The Oerlikon is Fully Automatic, whereas the American Bushmaster competitor is semi Automatic.

 

5.Colt's accuracy can't be denied... but it isn't Unique and more modern and rugged designs surpassed it.

6. The Eurocopter NH90 is more survivable (and modern) the Blackhawk.

 

Combined between all the countries of Europe,  The Pan-European countries sport 5 Aircraft carriers,  Two Super carriers (as of 2020),  One 40,000 Ton Nuclear CVN, and Two small carriers, and about a Dozen large nuclear powered submarines that launches nuclear ballistic missiles.

Ace, ace ace...oh my. Well, you numberized the list, ya knew that would draw me like month to flame. Just don't flame on me for offering a opposing view (you're not guilty of this, it's a pop shot at someone who knows who they are. Go Rapture!).

 1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoCOg8ZzUfg

2. If you really think america can't feed itself, you've drunk the Russian Kool-aid. That midwest ain't a joke. Alot of corn.

3. Making more drones that work with pilots everyday. US military is top notch. No one can touch it. Russia, maybe, thanks to it's space proggy.

4. F-22 Raptor and R-101 disagree. As do the M1 Abrahams that fire off uraninum depleted shells that litearlly melt enemy armor.

Now let's look at this comparision nonsense. 

1. Tanks haven't won a war since WW1, so even if I give ya that this Challenger 2 is suppose to be the best armored unit on the planet (and even you say it's disputable), it won't make much impact after my R-101 blows that thing off the map without ever being seen.

2.LOL no one scared of german armor. This ain't 1938.

3. F35 < F22

4. I'll surrender to the fact other nations have better jeeps than we do e.e because no one uses that crap anymore. It's all about the drone strike.

5. Colt? Ha, if we go for real, it's OCIWs son.

6. And my drone at 10000 ft. is superior to both and knock em both off radar in seconds.

Even if all the nations of the world teamed up against the US, they would lose, as would we. See, if we know we can't win, then we launch the nukes. If that is interupted, we drop the Rods of God and cleanse the planet. So let's all play nice and try to find a way to work together while maintaining national soverienties instead of playing my dad can kick your dad's ass. Peace ^.^ In our time. Think about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The F22 Is too expensive to throw into combat in a cavalier manner and call it a "sorte", it doesn't have good numbers, and it has defects.

Everytime you lose an F22 Raptor, you lost half a Nimitz carrier, in terms of cost.

:)

Edited by AceMan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Restore formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.