Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Solo

Ebola: Closer look at 9 month semen positive findings

8 posts in this topic

Thought you guys may like to see some of the details studying Ebola, the actual journal and stats for it being found in semen of surviving males.

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1511410

Looks like they had a 100 sample size (93 "donators"), so that's pretty good as far as a early study. Should be able to catch a decent range with that many participants, but they lack long term results. For all we know things can pop up years later but it is a start.

 

A total of 93 participants provided an initial semen sample for analysis. Of whom 46 (49%) had positive results.

9 of the men's samples were from 2-3 months after Ebola symptoms started and all 9 100% were positive in semen analysis.

26 out of 40 (65%) of men who had samples taken from 4 to 6 months after symptoms tested positive.

11 out of 43 (26%) of men who had samples ranging from 7 to 9 months tested positive.

1 sample only taken at 10 months, it was Indeterminate.

 

http://i.imgur.com/66oTDFo.jpg

 

http://i.imgur.com/9aDupBG.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/20/2015, 10:45:48, Solo said:

Thought you guys may like to see some of the details studying Ebola, the actual journal and stats for it being found in semen of surviving males.

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1511410

Looks like they had a 100 sample size (93 "donators"), so that's pretty good as far as a early study. Should be able to catch a decent range with that many participants, but they lack long term results. For all we know things can pop up years later but it is a start.

 

A total of 93 participants provided an initial semen sample for analysis. Of whom 46 (49%) had positive results.

9 of the men's samples were from 2-3 months after Ebola symptoms started and all 9 100% were positive in semen analysis.

26 out of 40 (65%) of men who had samples taken from 4 to 6 months after symptoms tested positive.

11 out of 43 (26%) of men who had samples ranging from 7 to 9 months tested positive.

1 sample only taken at 10 months, it was Indeterminate.

 

http://i.imgur.com/66oTDFo.jpg

 

http://i.imgur.com/9aDupBG.jpg

Yeh myself an a few others said it was an std way back when it happened, but its only now that its starting to come to light which is kinda strange. I still think this may make a comeback at some point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trying to keep tabs of almost everything long term. But this should of been a little more obvious I would think?

But it is still a good starting point as far as risk is concerned, but I wanted to point out how elementary it is in understanding as well, limited data.

More works needs to be done for longer a duration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trying to keep tabs of almost everything long term. But this should of been a little more obvious I would think?

But it is still a good starting point as far as risk is concerned, but I wanted to point out how elementary it is in understanding as well, limited data.

More works needs to be done for longer a duration.

I think the data exists. I just dont think its freely available.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the data exists. I just dont think its freely available.

I've been trying to find some "proof" of misdoing that cannot be denied, best thing I've found is an increase in death rates after vaccine administration in a medical source that was the authority of an outbreak in the 70's.

They had a pre vaccine death rate, an increase after that after a vaccine was administered, and a further increase after vaccine was completed. Pre-during-post data.

Read pages 114-115

http://www.enivd.de/EBOLA/pdf/ebola-hires.pdf

Typhoid vaccine was the culprit.

Dr. Van Nieuwenhove is a name you may want to look for.

"In Sudan the death rate for hospitalized patients went up from 25% in August, to 44,6% in September and 70% in October. The vaccination campaign was started on the 25th of September, I find such a rise in death rate very strange."

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I agree with vaccines causing a lot of trouble, and not a big fan. I declined them for my own kids for example.

With Ebola, if something is there to either increase the death rates, or potentially spread it faster, vaccines are obviously a possible way to do this. But to have an actual guy with boots on the ground, and a leading authority point it out is certainly intriguing.

It does not mean one has to be an officially recognized authority, but for people trying to stop researchers or investigators, it certainly makes it harder to be discredited by the agenda based.

For the current outbreak, there were also some water rights disputes, and water supply "tampering" that seemed promising as well, but I couldn't find the needle in the haystack to "prove" much of anything.

Something may be there too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I agree with vaccines causing a lot of trouble, and not a big fan. I declined them for my own kids for example.

With Ebola, if something is there to either increase the death rates, or potentially spread it faster, vaccines are obviously a possible way to do this. But to have an actual guy with boots on the ground, and a leading authority point it out is certainly intriguing.

It does not mean one has to be an officially recognized authority, but for people trying to stop researchers or investigators, it certainly makes it harder to be discredited by the agenda based.

For the current outbreak, there were also some water rights disputes, and water supply "tampering" that seemed promising as well, but I couldn't find the needle in the haystack to "prove" much of anything.

Something may be there too.

Indeed, I seen the info. Due to shortness of time (just got a job 52hrs a week), I can't spend hours looking for the info, however to _ , either that link or some other post I made in the past exposed aids by Bayer corp dumping it on 4 other countries with the help of US Govt. Maybe search bayer on this board or on www using a search engine. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Restore formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.