Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
rbear

9/11/2001 Direct Energy Weaponry

7 posts in this topic

9/11 remote-controlled antigravity UFO
ExopoliticsTV interview

In his ExopoliticsTV interview (below video), Jon Kelly states,

“9-11 as a showcase for exotic military technologies including black project UFO's. Why use a UFO to deliver an explosives payload? The UFO is destroyed in the delivery process. Is that a sign of advanced technologies, when your delivery vehicle is destroyed on the first delivery? Why use a UFO, then cover it up with video editing only to have it uncovered nine years later? Why not a missile or a bomb?”

Mr. Kelly continues,

“By destroying the delivery vehicle in the process of delivering an explosives payload to the WTC towers, one can reduce the opportunity for witnesses to make sense out of the attacks. According to Richard Hall's presentation, covering up the real events with video manipulation was important to the controllers behind the scenes of 9-11.”

Mr. Kelly states,

“The strategic model is not unlike a VBIED or a truck bomb, where a truck filled with explosives drives to the target then detonates.”

Mr. Kelly concludes,

“In Richard Hall's version of events, a VBIED in the form of an exploding UFO strikes the WTC. Mr. Hall clearly demonstrates that the raw video of this event was edited using masks and layers to produce a fictional visual account of the events of 9-11 for distribution as news by the major media. The raw video, sourced from a VHS recording is not a high resolution recording. However, it does convincingly display a metallic, reflective saucer-shaped vehicle in a steady, controlled descent into the WTC tower.”

In the ExopoliticsTV interview, Jon Kelly states,

“Mr. Hall’s hypothesis also resolves long-standing questions regarding the pod-shaped object protruding from the bottom of the jet airliner as it crashes into the tower. Mr. Hall describes the pod as the remnants of the UFO saucer mixed with the overlayed jet airliner video image. The overlay did not subtract the saucer from the frame, but combined it visually with the airliner.”

Mr. Kelly concludes,

“If this very expensive technology was deployed for this purpose, it represents extreme hubris and arrogance on the part of the deployers. Why did they need to do that? To show off to themselves? To show off to someone else? As an ultimate act of perversion?

They perverted the flow of tax dollars from the average citizens to develop secret technologies which they then used to secretly seize control of society and launch illegal wars.”.. http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_blackproject02.htm

source

9/11 documentary evidence of use of directed energy weapons at WTC

Seismic Record:

“The energy budget recorded in the seismic record on the day of 9/11 and the collapse of the WTC buildings did not reflect the mass of building materials involved in the collapse, nor the nearly freefall of the collapsing buildings. The seismic record demonstrates an event on the scale of a quarry blast. Where was the thud [that would have accompanied a WTC building collapse]?”

Kinetic Energy:

“Two robust WTC buildings with very robust steel beam reinforcement would release a sizeable amount of kinetic energy from the buildings falling - that would be all of the energy that went into the construction of the WTC buildings. The release of that amount of kinetic energy is not reflected in the physical evidence on the seismic record. Into what physical process did that kinetic energy go?”

Molecular Dissociation:

“The collapse of the WTC buildings produced the highest mass per volume of very fine particles (nanoparticles) ever measured in an air sample in the United States. It takes a tremendous amount of energy to dissociate or break the molecular bonds of steel, concrete and other building materials that were “powdered” into very fine particles during the collapse of the buildings.

The largest mass per volume of metals ever measured in an air sample in the US were reported by Dr. Thomas Cahill who did air monitoring for 5 months. Metal is used in buildings because it is very strong - and would require large amounts of energy to reduce it to nanoparticles.

Chemical explosives do not release enough energy to produce that volume of very fine particles. A much more energetic process was involved such as laser or beam energy which releases focused and concentrated energy as complex waveforms necessary to cause molecular dissociation.”

Physical Evidence of Buildings Collapsing:

“In videos of the collapses on 9/11 the WTC buildings erupted into emulsion like a drinking fountain, and the rubble did not hit the ground. Even on tape huge pieces of aluminum building siding vaporized as they were freefalling, and never hit the ground.” source

Controlled Demolition:

“The [collapse of the WTC buildings] was not a 'controlled demolition' for the following reasons:

WTC Detritus Pile

“Should have been 1/3 the height of the WTC buildings. The 100+ story WTC buildings were about 1 story high when the collapse of the buildings ended. A fireman on one of the news videos said the antenna that had been on the top of WTC Building 1 was on the top of a pile of rubble about one story high. The rubble pile should have been 35 stories if it was a conventional controlled demolition.”

WTC Rubble Never Hit the Ground

“This defies gravity, where did the rubble go?”

Footprints

“Geometrically Round Holes: contiguous round holes 24’ in diameter were in the footprints of the WTC buildings 1 and 2, and a 60’ deep geometrically round hole was in the middle of Liberty Street near the WTC. This is evidence of beam weapons. There was no debris inside the footprints of the two WTC buildings, only bare dirt with circles in the dirt.”

Dust

“In videos of the collapse larger particles fell and cascaded down from the buildings under the forces of gravity, but before they hit the ground they vaporized and suddenly went up into the atmosphere like an antigravity demonstration. Nanoparticles are so tiny that they are not subject to the forces of gravity, so molecular dissociation occurred on the larger particles as they were freefalling, reducing them into nano-particles (0.1 microns in diameter and smaller) that suddenly obeyed other physical laws of quantum mechanics. More evidence of [directed energy weapon or] HAARP/beam weapon technology applied during collapse.”

9/11 Satellite photos

“[9/11 satellite photographs showed] dust going into upper atmosphere - which had to be nanoparticles and may have been enhanced by other technology because most very fine particles/dust would stay in the Troposphere and be rained out in 2 months as we know from depleted uranium particulate releases from battlefield already.”

1400 Toasted Cars

“Located blocks from the WTC buildings, with door handles missing, engine blocks missing, blistering on some parts of the car finish, strange rust patterns on the bodies of the cars.”

Paper Around Cars Not Burned

"Whatever ‘vaporized’ the engine blocks and the door handles on 1400 cars did not ignite fragile and flammable paper lying all over the ground around the cars. If engine blocks and door handles selectively vaporized, why didn’t body of car vaporize?”

Pile of Cars Spontaneously Combusted

“In a news video, the entire pile of cars started burning spontaneously at the same time with no visible cause, it was not a fire that started in one car and spread to others.”

Rust Occurred Immediately

“On cars and trucks, and in FEMA photos there was heavy rust on steel beams - steel does not rust, and it is a slow oxidation process that results in rusting of iron. This rusting happened immediately.”

Basements of WTC Buildings Undamaged

“Stuffed mannequins in the basement of WTC with clothing on were carried out of the basement undamaged. If a 100+-story WTC building collapsed into its basement and left a 35-story rubble pile, there would be nothing left in the basement. Even streetcars underground at the WTC were pulled out after the collapse and had no damage.”

Prof. Cahill Air Monitoring Samples

“The hardest and most durable materials vaporized (steel, concrete etc), and the most fragile materials (paper) cascading out of WTC windows and all over the ground for blocks were undamaged.”

Truckloads of Potting Soil

“Right after the WTC disaster, the ground was “fuming”, and sequential FEMA aerial photos show 130 dump trucks full of soil (filled almost to the top of the dump truck space) covered with tarps so that the dirt in the trucks was not visible to onlookers on the street, coming into the WTC area, dumping the soil and going out for more. This happened even before the rescues or cleanup started and it continued for some time. The piles of soil were left for a week and got higher each day in sequential photos. The soil ‘fuming’ lasted until March 2002 (8 months).”

Boots Disintegrated

“Boots on emergency responders disintegrated after 2 hours. They had to get new boots every 2 hours - an effect of molecular dissociation. It was not from burning, their skin would have been damaged.”

No Ground Fuming During Rain

“For 99 days the “burning” (fuming) continued at the WTC site, but when it rained there was no fuming. If it had been fires burning, the rain would have caused steam from heating rainwater.”

USGS: Iron versus Steel

“The USGS analyzed the mineral form of the rust on steel beams and iron objects at the WTC. They did not address the ‘steel does not rust’ issue, but dodged it by referring to the rusted steel beams in the rubble pile as ‘iron beams’ and gave mineral analyses of iron minerals produced by oxidation.”

Official Sample Data Not Reliable

“Spectral absorption images at the WTC indicated average particle size was about 1 micron, which is subjected to gravity and would have fallen with the collapsed buildings. USGS did not collect many dust samples and collecting samples by other different agencies did not agree with each other. No samples were taken at the toasted cars.”!

Directed Energy Weapon Evidence

“Evidence of use of a directed energy weapon was present at the top of the WTC buildings as ‘lathering up’ started before buildings started coming down. ‘Lathering up’ in videos preceded the collapse of all buildings, even Building 7 which supposedly Larry Silverstein when he said, 'Pull it' to firefighters meant controlled demolition. Color alteration and modification in news videos compared to other photos/videos at tops of buildings indicates “doctoring” of images. When the Seattle Dome was destroyed with controlled demolition, the dust created by the destruction did not get any higher than the top of the building. The WTC dust got into the upper atmosphere almost immediately - which indicates very tiny atmospheric dust sized particles (0.1 micron and smaller), in fact smaller than atmospheric dust that stays mainly in the Troposphere.

“Lathering Up” Incriminating

“WTC Building 7 ‘lathered up’ even before WTC Building 2 went down. WTC Building 7 not damaged at all by WTC Building 2 going down - right next to each other.”

Freon tanks

“Very odd, large tanks were removed from WTC building and OSHA made bogus statement about what and why they were removed. Was Freon used in WTC takedown? A NYC cop whom the researcher met with Cindy Sheehan said he was injured in WTC Building 7 and removed on a gurney, but his eyes were covered so he could not see anything as they left the building. He reported he was able to see dead bodies lying all over the floor as he was being carried out - before building 7 had collapsed. Was this due to Freon asphyxiation put through ventilation system like in a recent Russian submarine disaster?

This prima facie evidence of the use of U.S. exotic black budget technologies in 9/11 can bring the perpetrators of 9/11 to justice.

The prima facie eyewitness, whistleblower and documentary evidence now available that these four exotic black budget technologies in the sole possession of the U.S. military-intelligence sector is sufficient to bring the perpetrators of the false flag operation of September 11, 2001 to justice under the following provision of the U.S. constitution, and related criminal laws for non-U.S. citizens who were perpetrators of the false flag operation of 9/11.

Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution provides:

"Sect. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on open confession in open court." source (probably won't come up correctly so just go to http://www.prisonplanet.com/crane-that-collapsed-in-mecca-killing-101-on-9-11-was-owned-by-bin-laden-family.html and then probably will have to load comments (more) then name : DIRECT ENERGY WEAPONS ANYONE? (same for other sources above) Disqus has a weird way of not doing comments for sources correctly)

work in progress, I had to switch keyboards as the other one mysteriously stopped working, just as it usually does when I try to post something of a con traversal nature. Touching more on this, the only keys that worked was tab and enter. 

 

 

 

Edited by rbear
+

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Something clearly happened which cannot easily be explained.

Jet fuel cannot burn hot enough to "vaporize" never mind burn those massive steel girders.   The whole building basically turned to dust (ash) - it is just so uncanny.

Just too many questions and too little answers!

 

The War On Waste
LOS ANGELES, Jan. 29, 2002

"How do we know we need $48 billion since we don't know what we're spending and what we're buying?"
Retired Vice Admiral Jack Shanahan

(CBS) On Sept. 10, [2001] Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld declared war. Not on foreign terrorists, "the adversary's closer to home. It's the Pentagon bureaucracy," he said. 
He said money wasted by the military poses a serious threat. 
"In fact, it could be said it's a matter of life and death," he said. 
Rumsfeld promised change but the next day – Sept. 11-- the world changed and in the rush to fund the war on terrorism, the war on waste seems to have been forgotten. 
Just last week President Bush announced, "my 2003 budget calls for more than $48 billion in new defense spending." 
More money for the Pentagon, CBS News Correspondent Vince Gonzales reports, while its own auditors admit the military cannot account for 25 percent of what it spends. 
"According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions," Rumsfeld admitted. 
$2.3 trillion — that's $8,000 for every man, woman and child in America. To understand how the Pentagon can lose track of trillions, consider the case of one military accountant who tried to find out what happened to a mere $300 million. 
"We know it's gone. But we don't know what they spent it on," said Jim Minnery, Defense Finance and Accounting Service. 
Minnery, a former Marine turned whistle-blower, is risking his job by speaking out for the first time about the millions he noticed were missing from one defense agency's balance sheets. Minnery tried to follow the money trail, even crisscrossing the country looking for records. 
"The director looked at me and said 'Why do you care about this stuff?' It took me aback, you know? My supervisor asking me why I care about doing a good job," said Minnery. 
He was reassigned and says officials then covered up the problem by just writing it off. 
"They have to cover it up," he said. "That's where the corruption comes in. They have to cover up the fact that they can't do the job." 
The Pentagon's Inspector General "partially substantiated" several of Minnery's allegations but could not prove officials tried "to manipulate the financial statements." 
Twenty years ago, Department of Defense Analyst Franklin C. Spinney made headlines exposing what he calls the "accounting games." He's still there, and although he does not speak for the Pentagon, he believes the problem has gotten worse. 
"Those numbers are pie in the sky. The books are cooked routinely year after year," he said. 
Another critic of Pentagon waste, Retired Vice Admiral Jack Shanahan, commanded the Navy's 2nd Fleet the first time Donald Rumsfeld served as Defense Secretary, in 1976. 
In his opinion, "With good financial oversight we could find $48 billion in loose change in that building, without having to hit the taxpayers." 
©MMII, CBS Worldwide Inc. All Rights Reserved

http://www.oilempire.us/trillions.html

 

Edited by FalkeAuge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9/11 remote-controlled antigravity UFO
ExopoliticsTV interview

In his ExopoliticsTV interview (below video), Jon Kelly states,

“9-11 as a showcase for exotic military technologies including black project UFO's. Why use a UFO to deliver an explosives payload? The UFO is destroyed in the delivery process. Is that a sign of advanced technologies, when your delivery vehicle is destroyed on the first delivery? Why use a UFO, then cover it up with video editing only to have it uncovered nine years later? Why not a missile or a bomb?”

Mr. Kelly continues,

“By destroying the delivery vehicle in the process of delivering an explosives payload to the WTC towers, one can reduce the opportunity for witnesses to make sense out of the attacks. According to Richard Hall's presentation, covering up the real events with video manipulation was important to the controllers behind the scenes of 9-11.”

Mr. Kelly states,

“The strategic model is not unlike a VBIED or a truck bomb, where a truck filled with explosives drives to the target then detonates.”

Mr. Kelly concludes,

“In Richard Hall's version of events, a VBIED in the form of an exploding UFO strikes the WTC. Mr. Hall clearly demonstrates that the raw video of this event was edited using masks and layers to produce a fictional visual account of the events of 9-11 for distribution as news by the major media. The raw video, sourced from a VHS recording is not a high resolution recording. However, it does convincingly display a metallic, reflective saucer-shaped vehicle in a steady, controlled descent into the WTC tower.”

In the ExopoliticsTV interview, Jon Kelly states,

“Mr. Hall’s hypothesis also resolves long-standing questions regarding the pod-shaped object protruding from the bottom of the jet airliner as it crashes into the tower. Mr. Hall describes the pod as the remnants of the UFO saucer mixed with the overlayed jet airliner video image. The overlay did not subtract the saucer from the frame, but combined it visually with the airliner.”

Mr. Kelly concludes,

“If this very expensive technology was deployed for this purpose, it represents extreme hubris and arrogance on the part of the deployers. Why did they need to do that? To show off to themselves? To show off to someone else? As an ultimate act of perversion?

They perverted the flow of tax dollars from the average citizens to develop secret technologies which they then used to secretly seize control of society and launch illegal wars.”.. http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_blackproject02.htm

source

9/11 documentary evidence of use of directed energy weapons at WTC

Seismic Record:

“The energy budget recorded in the seismic record on the day of 9/11 and the collapse of the WTC buildings did not reflect the mass of building materials involved in the collapse, nor the nearly freefall of the collapsing buildings. The seismic record demonstrates an event on the scale of a quarry blast. Where was the thud [that would have accompanied a WTC building collapse]?”

Kinetic Energy:

“Two robust WTC buildings with very robust steel beam reinforcement would release a sizeable amount of kinetic energy from the buildings falling - that would be all of the energy that went into the construction of the WTC buildings. The release of that amount of kinetic energy is not reflected in the physical evidence on the seismic record. Into what physical process did that kinetic energy go?”

Molecular Dissociation:

“The collapse of the WTC buildings produced the highest mass per volume of very fine particles (nanoparticles) ever measured in an air sample in the United States. It takes a tremendous amount of energy to dissociate or break the molecular bonds of steel, concrete and other building materials that were “powdered” into very fine particles during the collapse of the buildings.

The largest mass per volume of metals ever measured in an air sample in the US were reported by Dr. Thomas Cahill who did air monitoring for 5 months. Metal is used in buildings because it is very strong - and would require large amounts of energy to reduce it to nanoparticles.

Chemical explosives do not release enough energy to produce that volume of very fine particles. A much more energetic process was involved such as laser or beam energy which releases focused and concentrated energy as complex waveforms necessary to cause molecular dissociation.”

Physical Evidence of Buildings Collapsing:

“In videos of the collapses on 9/11 the WTC buildings erupted into emulsion like a drinking fountain, and the rubble did not hit the ground. Even on tape huge pieces of aluminum building siding vaporized as they were freefalling, and never hit the ground.” source

Controlled Demolition:

“The [collapse of the WTC buildings] was not a 'controlled demolition' for the following reasons:

WTC Detritus Pile

“Should have been 1/3 the height of the WTC buildings. The 100+ story WTC buildings were about 1 story high when the collapse of the buildings ended. A fireman on one of the news videos said the antenna that had been on the top of WTC Building 1 was on the top of a pile of rubble about one story high. The rubble pile should have been 35 stories if it was a conventional controlled demolition.”

WTC Rubble Never Hit the Ground

“This defies gravity, where did the rubble go?”

Footprints

“Geometrically Round Holes: contiguous round holes 24’ in diameter were in the footprints of the WTC buildings 1 and 2, and a 60’ deep geometrically round hole was in the middle of Liberty Street near the WTC. This is evidence of beam weapons. There was no debris inside the footprints of the two WTC buildings, only bare dirt with circles in the dirt.”

Dust

“In videos of the collapse larger particles fell and cascaded down from the buildings under the forces of gravity, but before they hit the ground they vaporized and suddenly went up into the atmosphere like an antigravity demonstration. Nanoparticles are so tiny that they are not subject to the forces of gravity, so molecular dissociation occurred on the larger particles as they were freefalling, reducing them into nano-particles (0.1 microns in diameter and smaller) that suddenly obeyed other physical laws of quantum mechanics. More evidence of [directed energy weapon or] HAARP/beam weapon technology applied during collapse.”

9/11 Satellite photos

“[9/11 satellite photographs showed] dust going into upper atmosphere - which had to be nanoparticles and may have been enhanced by other technology because most very fine particles/dust would stay in the Troposphere and be rained out in 2 months as we know from depleted uranium particulate releases from battlefield already.”

1400 Toasted Cars

“Located blocks from the WTC buildings, with door handles missing, engine blocks missing, blistering on some parts of the car finish, strange rust patterns on the bodies of the cars.”

Paper Around Cars Not Burned

"Whatever ‘vaporized’ the engine blocks and the door handles on 1400 cars did not ignite fragile and flammable paper lying all over the ground around the cars. If engine blocks and door handles selectively vaporized, why didn’t body of car vaporize?”

Pile of Cars Spontaneously Combusted

“In a news video, the entire pile of cars started burning spontaneously at the same time with no visible cause, it was not a fire that started in one car and spread to others.”

Rust Occurred Immediately

“On cars and trucks, and in FEMA photos there was heavy rust on steel beams - steel does not rust, and it is a slow oxidation process that results in rusting of iron. This rusting happened immediately.”

Basements of WTC Buildings Undamaged

“Stuffed mannequins in the basement of WTC with clothing on were carried out of the basement undamaged. If a 100+-story WTC building collapsed into its basement and left a 35-story rubble pile, there would be nothing left in the basement. Even streetcars underground at the WTC were pulled out after the collapse and had no damage.”

Prof. Cahill Air Monitoring Samples

“The hardest and most durable materials vaporized (steel, concrete etc), and the most fragile materials (paper) cascading out of WTC windows and all over the ground for blocks were undamaged.”

Truckloads of Potting Soil

“Right after the WTC disaster, the ground was “fuming”, and sequential FEMA aerial photos show 130 dump trucks full of soil (filled almost to the top of the dump truck space) covered with tarps so that the dirt in the trucks was not visible to onlookers on the street, coming into the WTC area, dumping the soil and going out for more. This happened even before the rescues or cleanup started and it continued for some time. The piles of soil were left for a week and got higher each day in sequential photos. The soil ‘fuming’ lasted until March 2002 (8 months).”

Boots Disintegrated

“Boots on emergency responders disintegrated after 2 hours. They had to get new boots every 2 hours - an effect of molecular dissociation. It was not from burning, their skin would have been damaged.”

No Ground Fuming During Rain

“For 99 days the “burning” (fuming) continued at the WTC site, but when it rained there was no fuming. If it had been fires burning, the rain would have caused steam from heating rainwater.”

USGS: Iron versus Steel

“The USGS analyzed the mineral form of the rust on steel beams and iron objects at the WTC. They did not address the ‘steel does not rust’ issue, but dodged it by referring to the rusted steel beams in the rubble pile as ‘iron beams’ and gave mineral analyses of iron minerals produced by oxidation.”

Official Sample Data Not Reliable

“Spectral absorption images at the WTC indicated average particle size was about 1 micron, which is subjected to gravity and would have fallen with the collapsed buildings. USGS did not collect many dust samples and collecting samples by other different agencies did not agree with each other. No samples were taken at the toasted cars.”!

Directed Energy Weapon Evidence

“Evidence of use of a directed energy weapon was present at the top of the WTC buildings as ‘lathering up’ started before buildings started coming down. ‘Lathering up’ in videos preceded the collapse of all buildings, even Building 7 which supposedly Larry Silverstein when he said, 'Pull it' to firefighters meant controlled demolition. Color alteration and modification in news videos compared to other photos/videos at tops of buildings indicates “doctoring” of images. When the Seattle Dome was destroyed with controlled demolition, the dust created by the destruction did not get any higher than the top of the building. The WTC dust got into the upper atmosphere almost immediately - which indicates very tiny atmospheric dust sized particles (0.1 micron and smaller), in fact smaller than atmospheric dust that stays mainly in the Troposphere.

“Lathering Up” Incriminating

“WTC Building 7 ‘lathered up’ even before WTC Building 2 went down. WTC Building 7 not damaged at all by WTC Building 2 going down - right next to each other.”

Freon tanks

“Very odd, large tanks were removed from WTC building and OSHA made bogus statement about what and why they were removed. Was Freon used in WTC takedown? A NYC cop whom the researcher met with Cindy Sheehan said he was injured in WTC Building 7 and removed on a gurney, but his eyes were covered so he could not see anything as they left the building. He reported he was able to see dead bodies lying all over the floor as he was being carried out - before building 7 had collapsed. Was this due to Freon asphyxiation put through ventilation system like in a recent Russian submarine disaster?

This prima facie evidence of the use of U.S. exotic black budget technologies in 9/11 can bring the perpetrators of 9/11 to justice.

The prima facie eyewitness, whistleblower and documentary evidence now available that these four exotic black budget technologies in the sole possession of the U.S. military-intelligence sector is sufficient to bring the perpetrators of the false flag operation of September 11, 2001 to justice under the following provision of the U.S. constitution, and related criminal laws for non-U.S. citizens who were perpetrators of the false flag operation of 9/11.

Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution provides:

"Sect. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on open confession in open court." source (probably won't come up correctly so just go to http://www.prisonplanet.com/crane-that-collapsed-in-mecca-killing-101-on-9-11-was-owned-by-bin-laden-family.html and then probably will have to load comments (more) then name : DIRECT ENERGY WEAPONS ANYONE? (same for other sources above) Disqus has a weird way of not doing comments for sources correctly)

work in progress, I had to switch keyboards as the other one mysteriously stopped working, just as it usually does when I try to post something of a con traversal nature. Touching more on this, the only keys that worked was tab and enter. 

 

 

 

:vFpL81r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Something clearly happened which cannot easily be explained.

Jet fuel cannot burn hot enough to "vaporize" never mind burn those massive steel girders.   The whole building basically turned to dust (ash) - it is just so uncanny.

Just too many questions and too little answers!

 

 

:yah::dgK4P0r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ken O keefe on  911 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8__64mFVes

(Guy who did the Ex Marine Goes Crazy, Blows Whistle On Syrian False Flag And Real Agenda

9/11 BOMBSHELL: METHODICAL DECEPTION -- Rebekah Roth 

Published on Sep 10, 2015

Former flight attendant turned researcher, truth teller and author Rebekah Roth joins me on the 14th anniversary of 9/11 to discuss her new book 'Methodical Deception', the follow up to her very popular first book 'Methodical Illusion'. Both books are available at www.methodicaldeception.com

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Building 3 was doing an audit of the Pentagon and trying to determine the extent of fraud within the MIC!!! That is why #3 was taken down! Read up about #3 and the connection to the Oklahoma debacle!!! Charges were set on the rear columns of the building but the truck with the expolsives hit out front. US wouldn't let top explosives experts NEAR the SITE ! Also the insurance was increased before the attack! source

OKC – A Conspiracy Theory http://www.conspiracyoutpost.com/topic/110-okc-–-a-conspiracy-theory/ 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This massive billboard is set up across the street from the NY Times right now

The best presentation on 9/11 to date came out yesterday.. It features a scientific approach to questions that were never explained by the 9/11 commission report and lots of analysed footage from 9/11. Must watch if you never understood why there is over 2000+ Architects and Engineers supporting a new independent investigation. source

9/11: Decade of Deception (Full Film NEW 2015)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqqelDq4P48

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Restore formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.