Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
CSB

Russia Presents Evidence Against U.S. , UK and Israel As Being the Actual 9/11 Terrorist

4 posts in this topic

Russia Presents Evidence Against U.S. , UK and Israel As Being the Actual 9/11 Terrorist

By conspiracyclub - Sep 12, 2015
 
 

“9/11 was an Anglo-American black operation executed in collusion with Israeli Secret Services and Saudi Arabian financiers.” — 9/11 Investigator

Undoubtedly the 9/11 attacks on New York City and Washington DC are the most misrepresented by officialdom in US history.

Whereas the assassination of John F. Kennedy is now understood to have been a classic CIA Execution Plan, it does not come close to 9/11 in terms of the number and magnitude of outright falsehoods, misleading statements, fake science and fraudulent facts submitted by officials and agents of the US Government.  The ‘official’ 9/11 Commission Report stands as the most fabricated document ever produced by US tax dollars.  Not only did the investigation avoid every serious inquiry about how two steel frame building came down after being dustified in NYC, it also subverted every initiative to ferret out the truth.

 

That’s all about to change in 2014.

 

It appears that Russia has been conducting systematic data dumps on 9/11, the release of which represents more factual information on the attacks than any US Government source.  In the wake of the Anglo-American coup d’état conducted by the CIA and MI6 in Kiev, it appears that Russia has no more patience for Western interference.  Especially when nations are destabilized on Russia’s borders do the stakes in this highly consequential geopolitical chess match go up.

 

Read the whole post here : http://www.conspiracyclub.co/2015/09/12/russia-presents-evidence-911/

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gordon Duff’s Veterans Today is Admitted Source of Disinformation

“About 30% of what’s on Veterans Today is patently false.   About 40% of what I write is at least purposefully partially false.  Because if I didn’t write false information I wouldn’t be alive.  I simply have to do that.” (he said so himself) see vid of him saying it below

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3m-ZY0R1HdQ

source

also see its the same stance he took before.... http://wolfblitzzer0.blogspot.cz/2014/06/gordon-duff-9-11-disinfo-toad-updated.html

translation: some truth mixed with disinfo.

Now with that said, there was some good info on there, and still is about VT (not to be confused with VTN). The good stuff I heard from there is from their older things. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ted+gunderson

With that said ted gunderson was supposedly married to a satanic devil worshiper, same as stew web was. Stew Webb supposedly broke into Ted Gunderson's house and then he recognized this was the lady who tried to ki ll him before. Now Stew Webb's wife tried to ki ll their daughter also for a cult of Denver Colorado Illuminati (bush/etc). So I think either way they were equal almost in this regard as they were married to satanic people so should be no qualms. Anyhow Ted Gunderson was supposably ki lled at age 82 by cyanide poisoning. If he wasn't, well could have been old age. I am not saying he didn't say anything wrong at all, I just haven't found it yet besides him maybe saying Stew Webb was a mosad disinfo. Stew later said Ted was a Cia disinfo person so I guess equal. Without the infighting on whatever, just stick to the facts and go from there.  

http://educate-yourself.org/tg/

https://kendoc911.wordpress.com/debunking-a-nuclear-hypothesis/veterans-today-is-disinfo/

I suggest either way you look at it, just analyze all the evidence before you can come to any conclusion. 

Edited by rbear
+

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

old info presented as new (as my above links show) however I will point it out here:

Disinformation is defined by Merriam-Webster as "false information deliberately and often covertly spread (as by the planting of rumors) in order to influence public opinion or obscure the truth." Gordon Duff, senior editor of the website Veterans Today, published an article on May 20, 2014, that can only be described as rank disinformation that is meant to obscure the truth about 9-11. To deliberately spread lies about what caused the deaths of thousands of people on 9-11 is an egregious and unforgivable offense.

The article, entitled "Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed - Russia Opens Files on Nuclear 9/11 and Israeli Proliferation" contains many flagrant errors as it pushes the idea that nuclear bombs were used to bring down the Twin Towers. Duff claims the evidence of a bi-layered composite of super-thermite found in the dust of the towers was somehow produced by the nuclear explosion that destroyed the tower.

EVIDENCE OF EXPLOSIVE THERMITE - Chips of the active thermitic material found in the dust of the destroyed Twin Towers. This material, which was manufactured using nano-technology, is extremely energetic and releases more energy per gram than all other known explosives used in demolition.

9-11 GUFF FROM GORDON DUFF

The Duff article, which was edited by Jim W. Dean, is so full of errors that it cannot be taken seriously, except perhaps as evidence of his role as an agent of disinformation about 9-11. With this in mind, I wrote to Mr. Duff on May 23 to ask him why he had published this piece:

Dear Mr. Duff,

I am writing to ask you about your recent article, "Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed".

Why did you publish this piece, which is clearly disinformation about 9-11, at this particular time? Who are you doing this for? I would think that this piece, which contains so many flagrant errors, clearly exposes you as an agent of 9-11 disinformation.

Can you explain why you published this article?

Christopher Bollyn

Gordon Duff responded the same day: 

chris

of those involved in 9/11, you are one of the few who actually does work. of those involved in 9/11, i am the only one with a background in intelligence and who works actively in that area.

the piece, as published, is what was submitted. it, of course, debunks nanothermite, something the scientific community did years ago.

you see, i met the group working on nano-thermite, people well known to stephen jones, when they came to me for investment. their security officer, claudio d la'o, brought them to me.

no nanothermite was ever produced, a propellant with no production facility nor any purpose other than to replace the gun on the apache, something not done.

did you ever find the factory that you believe made it? I can give you several reasons you didn't.

I believe that "nanothermite" is the creation of disinformation agents. others who believe have become proprietary and defensive.

this is the first material that has come from a national intelligence agency. it is a huge breakthru for us.

as you had found '9/11 truth' totally stalled, over a decade now, hobbiests, freaks, shills, many of those, time wasters, i have long disassociated myself.

i am surprised at your accusation. VT has done more real damage that all others combined, by such a margin it is not worth discussing. we are 'the last man standing.'

you know, publishing books can be a problem. you take hits. i accept them. you don't.

I also simply run with the best information I can get and have the facilities to investigate things. after all, i do run a company with both a counter-intelligence division and one that does international criminal investigations.

my chief of staff was attache to israel and had investigated dimona. he is far from my only personal source.

admit this, you would never have access to something like that. I admit that I am prevented from printing what I could.

accept that the sale of nuclear material by the bush family is real. accept other things you choose to.

doubt everything.

please note that i am not an internet person. i just returned from Africa, i have defense contracts there and the middle east. i have a scientific staff with full nuclear clearances (i dont have). my group has done security assessments at all our nuclear facilities.

i don't look down on you but i do look down on most others and deeply resent them.

i have never spoken a word against you. i respect what you have done.

however, you have to admit that i have taken on more "risk" and been more confrontive than all combined. I do this, to an extent, because I am not entirely without some protecting and backing.

If you really think I can be "gotten to," you have not been paying attention. you are attacking my analysis through a bizarre personal accusation not only without foundation but almost irrational.

do this: prove me wrong. show me a nanothermite factory. get me people who have handled tons of it. show me how it was applied and used.

duplicate your hypothesis experimentally.

The russians have done that.

g [Gordon Duff]

CHECKING THE FACTS

The obvious purpose of the Gordon Duff article is to try to deny the presence and role of thermite (super-thermite in particular) in the destruction of the towers. The Duff piece contains so many errors that I am only going to point out those that pertain directly to the evidence of what happened on 9-11.

The Duff piece claims that nuclear devices were used on 9-11 and that these melted the "I beams of the central core" of the Twin Towers. 

Fact: The core columns of the Twin Towers were box columns. I don't know what "I beams" he is talking about. The walls of the central box columns were 4 inches thick at the base and tapered to about 1/4 inch at the top of the towers.

The core box columns that held up the Twin Towers can be seen in this photo. The box column in the center appears to have been cut with a steel-melting charge of thermite.

The Duff piece says: "Melted steel and iron oxide or 'nano-thermite' is a byproduct of the very high gamma ray/Neutron flux induced into the central steel core. The radiation dissolves the steel into oxide consuming the carbon and silicone [sic] in the steel."

Fact: Iron oxide, or rust, is a component of thermite, not a product of a thermite reaction. What was found in the dust was large amounts of molten iron droplets or spheres. The molten iron that was found in the dust and at the base of the destroyed towers is evidence of a thermitic reaction, not a nuclear bomb. 

 etc 

http://wolfblitzzer0.blogspot.cz/2014/06/gordon-duff-9-11-disinfo-toad-updated.html

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Restore formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead


Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.