Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
rbear

Finally, a BIG PICTURE and “HOW” to Take Our Country Back.

7 posts in this topic

I posted this a while back but I think alot missed it as it was in thread Stories contributed by The Vatic Project (Too Much To List 1 by 1 on a thread)  . I am still disecting lots from that thread and found this gem!

Finally, a BIG PICTURE and “HOW” to Take Our Country Back. (Been after it for 5 hours now on this site linked below (with a snipet of whats there c&p here)

As Thomas Jefferson admonished us,  “A civilization that expects to be 'ignorant and Free', expects what never was and never will be.”  So, now its up to us, each and everyone of us, to either research for and educate ourselves or read and digest the information from those who do research and educate themselves and then graciously share it with others, while also taking abuse for doing so.  Good reading and take your time.   This is a lot of information, so treat it with respect. 

 
GIANT OVERVIEW OF OUR PROBLEM – Table of Contents
Dr. Gerry Mills,  PHD,  American Action Report, 
 
“Take our country back!” and “Take our government back!” are rallying cries for liberals, conservatives, libertarians, and—well, everyone but mugwumps. A mugwump is someone who sits on the fence with his mug on one side and his “wump” on the other.
  
     Unless “We the People” take the trouble to inform ourselves as to how things actually work, we the voters, at best, will do no more than faces in Congress will do little or nothing to put average Americans in the driver's seat. 
     Let's look at another aspect of the situation. A wag once said, “If the meek shall inherit the earth, who will step forward to claim it?” By themselves, temper tantrums in the streets will do nothing to take our government back. We must step forward to claim it.
 
     In these articles, I attempt to address all these issues. To read each article, just click onto the title of the article.  With the Lord's help, I'll complete them well before the 2010 congressional elections.
 
     These articles can teach, they can offer hope, they can provide inspiration; but they can not supply courage itself. For courage, each person must look into his own soul.
 The Gauntlet We Face is an overview of the entire work.
      The following section deals with the question, “What went wrong in Washington?”  We have no way of understanding what's wrong with the Washington Establishment until we understand how it really works and what caused it to go wrong.  This section also offers insight as to how to make things go right.

Help Wanted: 435 JOB OPENINGS No experience or education needed. Attractive hair and acting ability a plus. $300,000 a year salary and benefits. Ethical people need not apply.

cont

Also might be of interest:

Recommended Books

 
Recommended Books
(This partial list of recommended books is still a work in progress. I expect to add dozens of books over the next few months.)

Secular Classics
The Art of War, (Sun Tze)
(War has truly been called “diplomacy by another means.” The converse of any true statement is itself a true statement. Diplomacy is war by another means. This small book has been used by generals to defeat their enemies, businessmen to understand their customers’ needs, and diplomats to plot strategy. How can you use it as a force for good?)
The Communist Manifesto, (Karl Marx) 
Marxism isn’t dead; it has only altered its form. Here’s a key to understanding it.
Federalist Papers, John Jay, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison
When Benjamin Franklin was asked what kind of government the Constitutional Convention had given the people, he replied, “A republic—if you can keep it.” Those who want to reclaim the republic would do well to understand what kind of government the Founding Fathers intended for us to have.
The Law, (Frederick Bastiat)
Written as a rebuttal to The Communist Manifesto, this work is considered the definitive treatise providing practical and philosophical arguments for freedom. etc
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why Some People have a Phobia of Conspiracy Theories

(This article is the second version of a blog post I wrote a few months ago.  The first version was somehow lost.  No, I don’t suspect that it was destroyed by reptilian shape shifters that didn’t want you to read it.  My schedule has relaxed enough now that I’m able to write a second version of this article.  I hope it’s as informative as the first (missing) version.)

 
251543_10151388666682589_92757733_n.jpg
     We’ve all seen articles purporting to explain why some people are attracted to conspiracy theories.  The rationale behind the articles is that, if someone is aberrant enough to suspect that politicians sometimes have ulterior motives, this suspicion requires a socio-psychoanalytical explanation—from a safe distance, of course; and it should be performed only by someone who recognizes the danger of examining the facts for oneself.

     In a previous article, “Why Some People are Attracted to Conspiracy Theories,” I broke all the rules and presented my politically incorrect findings.  Yes, I admit it; I’m a thought criminal.

     It's highly curious that a belief in conspiracies is considered aberrant enough to warrant socio-psychological analysis; but no one seems to question why some other people are addicted to official narratives and have a phobia of conspiracy theories.  It’s as if the official narratives are the default explanation of events (like the reasonableness of wearing a hat as protection from the blinding rays of the sun), and that skepticism of official narratives is considered an oddball alternative (like wearing a lampshade over your head).

     (Actually, it’s the conspiratophobe who likes to imagine “truthers” as the sort of people who wear lampshades—probably so that people around the “truthers” will not be blinded by the dazzling light of truth.  Doesn’t it seem odd to “accuse” a political opponent of wanting to know the truth?  For what it’s worth, the opposite of truther is liar.)

     In the article, “Why Some People are Attracted to Conspiracy Theories,” I gave three commonly given explanations and showed the absurdity of all three.  To give equal time to conspiratophobes, I give three explanations for why certain other people have a phobia of anything—question, fact, or theory—that calls an official narrative into question.  Here are the three explanations:

1.    They are vain; to them, social responsibility is less important than a sense of personal reward or the approval of others.

2.    They’re either lazy or they’re moral cowards.

3.    They miss the comfort and security of their mothers’ wombs. cont

ConspiracyQuoteVoltaire.jpg
 
     They are vain; to them, social responsibility is less important than a sense of personal reward or the approval of others. This motivation is rather tricky to examine because certain virtues, such as social responsibility, are often compartmentalized.  I’ve known conspiratophobes who gave very much of themselves through organizations dedicated to helping others—deeds that brought them considerable honor and praise.  Belief in a conspiracy theory, however, calls for a similar level of commitment to the needs of others, but very few people will praise you for it.  More often, it results in disrepute and even social ostracism.
 
     It’s not that conspiracy deniers don’t see that there’s a problem.  Many conspiratophobes are highly intelligent, articulate people who use their intelligence in the service of self-deceit. cont

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only way is to end government corruption.  Take HRC for example.  Top secret docs on her private server.  Multiple felonies committed yet no charges and she will never see the inside of a jail cell.  Classic example of how totally corrupt and lawless gov has become.  What's worse is the sheeple will still vote for her because she is a democrat and or because she is a women.       

Governments all over the globe are bankrupt yet they keep borrowing with no intention of ever paying anything back.  Instead of correcting the problem the politicians keep borrowing while taxing the productive into the dirt.  By 2020 the payment on US government debt will exceed the current defense budget.  5 years.  And that's with 0% interest rates.  The Fed keeps jawboning interest rates hoping to keep the ponzi propped up. The reality is the Fed has not raised rates in 6 years.  The "let them eat cake" moment will come when the bond market breaks.       

Can't believe a word the politicians say because they lie all the time.  

Not going to take the government back.  Those in government have had the taste of power and will become more aggressive while they move toward totalitarianism tightening their control over the people to retain power.  Nothing will change until unrest rises to a revolutionary level. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only way is to end government corruption.  Take HRC for example.  Top secret docs on her private server.  Multiple felonies committed yet no charges and she will never see the inside of a jail cell.  Classic example of how totally corrupt and lawless gov has become.  What's worse is the sheeple will still vote for her because she is a democrat and or because she is a women.       

Governments all over the globe are bankrupt yet they keep borrowing with no intention of ever paying anything back.  Instead of correcting the problem the politicians keep borrowing while taxing the productive into the dirt.  By 2020 the payment on US government debt will exceed the current defense budget.  5 years.  And that's with 0% interest rates.  The Fed keeps jawboning interest rates hoping to keep the ponzi propped up. The reality is the Fed has not raised rates in 6 years.  The "let them eat cake" moment will come when the bond market breaks.       

Can't believe a word the politicians say because they lie all the time.  

Not going to take the government back.  Those in government have had the taste of power and will become more aggressive while they move toward totalitarianism tightening their control over the people to retain power.  Nothing will change until unrest rises to a revolutionary level. 

Nothing will change until unrest rises to a revolutionary level. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On a sliding scale, with 1 being content and complacent, and 10 being fed up and ready to rumble, where do you put most people?

I say -- 2.

Plenty of fast food and reality tv to keep their eyes off the ball, casinos, football season coming up to make them happy, no big false flags lately. 

Trump and Hill make media types happy. Store shelves are full, free money is readily available if you know how to game the system. It feels like the quiet before the storm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A VATIC MUST READ: ADL Creates Trail to Media Espionage Ring

Vatic Note:    This is a very interesting article, to say the least.   Outside of the GOP bashing I see on here, it appears to be fairly accurate.  What Gordon does not know, is that many democrats write to us and send info showing that Obama is tied very heavily into Netanyahu, as are the Bush's and the Clintons.  So are the neocon conservatives and neolibs.  But his effort to whitewash Obama, is not working with the dems and the independents as well as moderate republicans who supported him during his 2009 win.

This so called “split” between Netanyahu and Obama, is a false flag, disinfo, controlled opposition effort on the Israeli, and neolibs part in order to salvage Obama's reputation as being a pawn of Israel.   They wanted to use him to bring Americans together as adversaries of the Muslim world for WW III and its not working at all.   So, they had to separate Israel from Obama in order to try it again.  The Khazar Zionists and their Illluminati bloodline owners are the real problem and that is never going to change unless we do something about it.

The divide is NOT BETWEEN RIGHT AND LEFT GRASSROOTS AMERICANS.  Its between the globalists who are 15 years behind in their goal to globalize this planet and have a World War III to replenish their diminishing resources and the continued failures to start WW III.  We have been united as AMERICANS like never before with the left admitting the role Obama has played and is still playing in the Israel/Rothschild game, and the right admitting the role the Bush's have played in trying to bring this nation down.   ITS NOT A RIGHT OR LEFT ISSUE,  NOR A MUSLIM CHRISTIAN ISSUE.   ITS A FASCIST, Zionist Illuminati, issue that is being frustrated by the continued exposure of all parties on both sides,  by reliable and credible sources of research on the alternative press. .

EXAMPLE:  Its been proven by many many credible alternative news sources that ISIS is an Israeli, USA, Saudi, British created, funded, armed and trained provocateuring group called “Iraq and Syrian REBELS” which is erroneous.  They are “AGENTS” of the “controlled opposition”  for the purposes of starting WW III, and these globalists all over the planet have even built underground facilities for their protection when they lower the hammer on us.

They truly do believe we are so stupid we will buy anything they tell us to buy,  BUT NOT THIS TIME AROUND.   Trust is a thing of the past. The awakening on this planet is impressive and I am proud of even the sheep who now seem to know what is truly going on.  Its only the religious fundamentalists who are still asleep and operating in the dark.  My only issue with Gordon is his unbelievable refusal to see Obama's role in all this as a puppet for the masters that control his White House. His party loyalty seems to override his ability to see the truth.  What does that mean about Gordon???  I don't know, but I am beginning to question that point. 

Jefferson warned Americans of the danger to  our republic of political parties and all of this we have seen since 9-11 has convinced us  that he was sooooo right.   I could list numerous examples of both parties collusion with our globalist enemies, that it isn't even funny.  Since we posted them on this blog, I won't bore you with doing it again, but like WW II where both sides leaders were all khazars, and worked together to bring about such a war and the profits they made from it,  it just makes sense that they would do it again.  If it worked once they assume it will work again.  WRONG.  So, go ahead and read all this, but keep this Vatic note in mind as you do and use it to discern the truth. 

ADL Creates Trail to Media Espionage Ring 
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/04/05/352032/
By Gordon Duff,  Senior Editor, Veterans Today,  April 5, 2015

Uncovered: Links between the ADL, Israeli intelligence and Press TV, a carefully staged attack meant to restore the credibility of a “burned” asset
cont <--- link
May also want to see:
 
Scientific Study Reveals Conspiracy Theorists The Most Sane Of All.
 
 

The Non-Existent March Of +2,000,000 Americans Against The Puppet In The White House. 9/12/2009

(NaturalNews) If you’re a conspiracy theorist, then you’re crazy, right? That’s been the common belief for years, but recent studies prove that just the opposite is true.

Researchers — psychologists and social scientists, mostly — in the U.S. and United Kingdom say data indicate that, contrary to those mainstream media stereotypes, “conspiracy theorists” appear to be more sane than people who accept official versions of controversial and contested events.

The most recent study was published in July 2013 by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent in the UK. Entitled “‘What about Building 7?’ A Social Psychological Study of Online Discussion of 9/11 Conspiracy Theories,” the study compared “conspiracist,” or pro-conspiracy theory, and “conventionalist,” or anti-conspiracy, comments on news websites.

 

 

Americans Buy More Firearms In 3 Months, Than What It Takes To Outfit The Entire Chinese And Indian Armies Combined!

The researchers noted that they were surprised to find that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventional ones.

“Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist,” the researchers wrote.

‘The research showed that people who favored the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile’

So, among people who comment on news articles, those who discount official government accounts of events like the 9/11 attacks and the assassination of John F. Kennedy outnumber believers by more than two-to-one. That means the pro-conspiracy commenters are those who are now expressing what is considered conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters represent a small, beleaguered minority that is often scoffed at and shunned.

Rothschild's Banking Cabal's Totalitarian NWO By Genocide & Lies.

Rothschild’s Banking Cabal’s Totalitarian NWO By Genocide & Lies.

9/11: NEVER EVER EXPRESS DOUBTS ABOUT ANY PART OF THIS OFFICIAL ORCHESTRATED STORY TO ANYONE!

Perhaps becoming frustrated that their alleged mainstream viewpoints are no longer considered as such by the majority, those who are anti-conspiracy commenters often showed anger and disgust in their posts.

“The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals,” said the study.

Also, it seems that those who do not believe in the conspiracies were not just hostile but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. The researchers said that, according to the anti-conspiracy holders, their own theory of 9/11 — one which says 19 Muslims, none of whom could fly commercial airliners with any proficiency, pulled off an amazing surprise attack under the direction of a man on dialysis (Osama bin Laden) who was living in a cave somewhere in Afghanistan — is unwaveringly true.

 
In 1913 Jacob Schiff sets up the Anti Defamation League (ADL) in the United States. This organisation is formed to slander anyone who questions or challenges the Rothschild global conspiracy as, “anti-semitic.”
cont <--- link

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Restore formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.