Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
CGK

Oath Keepers National Call to Action

13 posts in this topic

Oath Keepers National Call to Action: Help Us “Protect the Protectors” by Guarding Recruiting and Reserve Centers

Time to Step Up and Get it Done.

This is a national Oath Keepers call to action, launching a nation-wide Oath Keepers Operation Protect the Protectors.   For this operation, we are calling on all Oath Keepers chapters in every state, and all individual Oath Keepers members, to step up in their community and stand guard at their local recruiting stations and Reserve centers (anywhere our military personnel are forced to be unarmed while exposed to attack) or assist as support for those who are standing guard.  Please do this immediately.

Recruiting stations across the nation continue to receive terrorist threats, and since the Obama Administration and the DOD still refuse to change the insane policy of ordering our troops to go unarmed in recruiting stations and Reserve centers, those troops are still at great risk.  So, it up to us veterans and dedicated patriots (whether veterans or not) to step in the gap and “Protect the Protectors.”

Many of our chapters and members are already guarding recruiting stations nation-wide.   In fact, on the day of the shooting, within hours of the attack, our Tennessee chapter was guarding several recruiting stations in that state (and are still doing so).   The next day, on Friday, July 17, 2015,  the Arkansas Oath Keepers chapter, lead by their state President, Special Forces veteran Rick Moon, launched their “Operation Protect the Protectors” in Arkansas, guarding numerous recruiting stations throughout that state.   On Sunday night  I held a call with our state leaders and encouraged them to do likewise.

And so, we are formally taking Operation Protect the Protectors nationwide.   All chapters are expected to participate.  If you are an Oath Keepers chapter leader (local or state), or CPT leader, you are expected to implement this operation as part of your duties.   All members are encouraged to participate or assist in any way they can (it is, of course, not mandatory for members, but they are strongly encouraged to take part.  It IS mandatory for leaders though).

We will stand guard at recruiting stations and other exposed military locations until the DOD changes its idiotic policy of insisting that recruiters go unarmed, while they are in uniform, in a clearly marked public office, open and accessible to anyone who wants to walk or drive up.     Even after that, we offer assistance in protecting our local schools and shopping malls, which are also “unarmed victim, free-fire zone” soft targets where any terrorist can be assured of unarmed victims – unless we protect them.

Coordinate with the established state and local chapter leaders, if you have such in your area.   If you don’t already have direct contact to your local or state Oath Keepers leadership, use Facebook to reach them, or send an email to us at national, using our “Contact” form and we will put you in touch with them.

If you don’t have an established chapter in your area, then organize a team yourself, in your local community.  Contact us here at national for help with that.

Other patriots, whether Oath Keepers members or not, are also encouraged to step up and protect our recruiters.   If you are the leader of another group who would like to work with your local Oath Keepers chapter on this, please contact them, using Facebook or by emailing us at national.

We need you to do the following:

A.   Reach out to local military recruiters (and Reserve/National Guard), schools, malls, and police

  1. Send an outreach team to your local Recruitment and Reserve Centers, and visit High School Principals and Mall Security offices to:
  2. Let them know what we are doing and that we are Oath Keepers
  3.  Tell them they need to add security for malls and schools; that OK can help, if they wish.
  4. Tell them that we will be coordinating with local police stations for added support at or near recruitment centers, and that we hope to work with the police on assisting with protection malls and schools as well.  They are at serious risk of being overwhelmed by a coordinated attack by terrorist teams on multiple soft targets.  We can help.
  5. To recruitment centers:  that we are there to deter attacks on their site and their persons.
  6. Also reach out to National Guard in your area to offer assistance and coordination in case they are attacked (their personnel are under similar idiotic restrictions on being armed).

B.   Form teams:

  1. Volunteers (minimum 2 per recruitment center) on duty at each designated site with its own duty roster.  Best to have additional covert team to back them up.
  2. Need state leaders to draft email to all members in their state asking for volunteers and then organizing and coordinating them while maintaining OPSEC.  This can also be done via Facebook but again, think OPSEC.
  3. Uniform:  OK cap or shirt (or other way to ID team, such as arm-band), body armor suggested, and weapon(s).  See below for guidelines on weapons.
  4. Duty:  preferably 4 hour shifts per day; 8 hours if insufficient volunteers.
  5. Coordinating instructions:  sufficient ammo (min of 4 mags per AR, for example) to suppress an attack, Individual First Aid Kit (IFAK), phone, camera, camel back, cooler with drinks/snacks/lunch (stay hydrated!).
  6. A courteous and professional disposition to all except Islamic jihadists.

Additional Preliminary Guidelines:

  • Work in at least teams of two.  If at all possible, avoid having a single Oath Keeper standing guard.   The more the better.
  • All those actually standing guard should be armed.  That is the whole point – to be armed to defend the recruiters who are under threat of UCMJ prosecution and discipline if they dare to go armed.   An unarmed guard is just a bullet catcher and another victim.
  • Be sure that those on the armed teams belong there.  Are they cool, collected, trained, experienced, competent and safe with their firearms?   Do they have the right training and/or experience to be on an armed team that may end up in a close range fire-fight with a suicidal terrorist with an AK?  If not, then they don’t belong there.  Remember, there may well be a parking lot full of innocent bystanders there when an attack is launched, and your team needs to be competent and calm enough under pressure to minimize the risk to those bystanders while stopping the threat.   We are looking for the quiet professionals.
  • If someone is not suitably trained or willing to serve on the armed detail, they can still serve in some support capacity.   Work that out among your chapters and CPTs.   Support is critical, as you will find out.  That is the whole point of the “B” or support team on a CPT.  This is a good time to get that organized.
  • The security teams can be openly armed, or covertly armed, at your discretion, and depending on your local situation.  You know your own AO best so you need to assess and make that decision.   An overt presence, where possible, does help to deter attack (though don’t count on it).   If you have good enough relations with your community and local police that you choose to make an overt presence, we strongly recommend that you also have a covert element on scene as well, to back up that overt team.   If attackers decide to move on a recruiting station guarded by an overt team, they will target that team first, so having a covert team to back them up will be essential to spoiling the attack.
  • Teams need to be close enough, and ready enough, to respond instantly and stop an attack at the very outset.   The longer it takes a team to respond, the more victims there will  be.   Use your discretion on how to make that happen.
  • Use your own best judgment on whether to use hand-guns or long guns, or both.   As for me, I would bring a rifle to what is likely to bee a rifle fight if a terrorist attacks, along with my pistol.  Again, depending on your environment, you can choose to have long guns visible, or not, and, likewise for handguns.  But always have a covert reserve of some kind, regardless.  Consider the utility of shotguns or frangible pistol and rifle rounds to minimize danger to bystanders.  But have  the ability to also shoot through obstacles, if needed.
  • Body armor is highly recommended, and since you are likely to face a terrorist armed with a rifle, rifle plates (steel or ceramic level III or above) are highly recommended if at all possible (Come And Take It! Armor has graciously offered all Oath Keepers who are serving on these security teams a 25% discount.  We will give the discount code to our leadership teams).
  • Be sure you notify the recruiters of your presence, so they know they are being protected, and so they don’t inadvertently mistake your security team for a threat.  Also, if for any reason you are unable to provide protection for any period of time during their business hours, be sure to notify them so they can make other arrangements and so they at least understand their exposure.
  • It is best that you also notify the local police and coordinate with them, if possible.   That will depend on whether you have friendly local police or not.  Some of our chapters that have already been standing guard have excellent relationships with local police and have coordinated directly, including letting the police know exactly who will be on guard, when, where, and what they are wearing.   Other chapters are in locales where the local police are not supportive and they are unfortunately not able to coordinate like that.   The more coordination you can do, the better, to avoid being mistaken for a threat, and to avoid a blue-on-blue tragedy.   But protecting the recruiters comes first.  So, if the local police are not supportive, or even hostile, deal with it and work around it to be sure the recruiters are protected (but be sure to at least notify the recruiters that you are out there).
  • Teams should notify the police if they spot suspicious activity that is not an immediate attack, such as is consistent with someone casing out a recruiting station or other actions consistent with preparation for a future attack.   let the police handle such situations, and just spot and report.
  • However, if an attack occurs, of course you must stop it immediately yourself, while minimizing the risk to bystanders as you do so.   Once an attack is launched, every second is critical and the longer the threat is up and running, the more casualties possible.
  • We will provide some more guidance and some ROEs on our members forum, or your team leaders will do so when you form up your teams.   Be careful to not put your SOPs, TTPs, or ROEs on the web, such as on Facebook or elsewhere on the open web.  And even be careful about putting too much detail on our member forums, which are also really not secure enough.
  • Avoid publishing too much details on which recruitment centers are being guarded, and when.   When contacted by media, you may want to give them one or two examples where an overt team is present that they can interview, but make sure they know those are only examples, and that other stations are being guarded as well, and they may be guarded by covert teams.   Do not give complete lists of stations being protected, or of total head count of personnel doing the protecting.  Keep that unknown to all except those directly involved and also the recruiters and friendly local police.
  • Work to coordinate wherever possible with local police to avoid a blue-on-blue incident. 
  • Be sure to get the consent of your team members before any media is allowed to photograph them, and be sure to have that covert reserve that the media never even knows is there (and cannot photograph).
  • You need to make contact with the administrators and security staff of your area schools and shopping malls also.  Help them to conduct a threat assessment, and offer you help and assistance in protecting them.

As said above, we will do this until the DOD changes its idiotic policy of insisting that recruiters go unarmed, while they are in uniform, in a clearly marked public office, open and accessible to anyone who wants to walk or drive up.

They may as well order the service-members to walk unarmed, but in uniform, down the streets of Baghdad.   The exposure is the same because any jihadist can simply look in the local phone book and find unarmed military service members to attack.  In fact, it may be worse to be unarmed in a recruiting or Reserve station in the US, since they are sitting ducks, in a stationary position, throughout their shift.  If they were walking down the streets of Baghdad, at least they would be moving.   This policy makes them sitting ducks, and unarmed sacrificial lambs, on the alter of anti-gun political correctness.

The DOD policy, which Obama has not corrected, even after this horrific terrorist attack, is an indication of the anti-gun insanity that has taken over in government circles in this country in recent decades.  It started under Bush the elder, back in 1993, and has been continued through all Administrations thereafter, of both parties.  It is foolish, irresponsible, and insane, and needs to be changed.   American police are not required to go unarmed as they do there work, and neither should American military personnel, and especially those who are ordered to work out among the public.

They are being forced, against their will, under orders, to go unarmed and they are at risk of prosecution and disciplinary action under the UCMJ if they dare to attempt to arm themselves against terrorist attack.   So long as they are under that false choice, we will defend them.   Thankfully, we veterans are no longer under the UCMJ and can tell the DOD and Obama to pound sand and they can’t do a damn thing about it.  So, we the veterans will go armed and we will protect our brothers and sisters in uniform until that evil policy is changed. – Time to step up.   As a SC Police Chief put it:

“We are not going to wait for the U.S. President to issue a directive for our U.S. Military recruiting stations to be able to arm themselves as self-defense. We have our local military recruiting office on extra patrol and a group of law abiding citizens, who just so happen to be former U.S. Military and pro-constitution advocates, that have vowed to stand guard to protect these offices. As long as the office is open for business these men are on watch duty!

This …is not vigilante justice! These men are law abiding CWP holders and former U.S. Military who will call 911 and allow us to do our job if they see something suspicious. But, they will also not hesitate to act if a terrorist with a gun approaches the recruiting office shooting. I would like to thank the Oathkeepers for stepping up to assist us and ensure that our U.S. Military are safe! As police officers we cannot be there every minute, so we appreciate these extra sets of eyes and ears that will notify us if anything is out of the ordinary.”

Keith Grounsell

 

And when it comes to our schools, we need to confront and deal with the reality that each and every school in America is a very soft target, full of unarmed teachers, and children who are being intentionally left undefended by the domestic enemies of the Constitution who control our federal government.   all of those children are at even greater risk than the recruiters.  If a lone jihadist can kill four Marines and a Sailor, imagine what they could do to class-rooms full of undefended or poorly defended children.  Imagine what a terrorist team could do.  See the recently released novel, Day of Rage for a graphic example of what that would be like.  We need to step up there to, and make sure they are protected and to make it clear who has their back and who doesn’t.

Not on our watch!

Stewart Rhodes

Founder and National President of Oath Keepers

http://oathkeepers.org/oktester/oath-keepers-national-call-to-action-help-us-protect-the-protectors-by-guarding-recruiting-and-reserve-centers/

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is stupid.

What next, we arm the kid working the drive-thru at McDonalds!

In case no one has noticed, the Oathkeepers are starting to look more and more like Stewart Rhodes private army.

Notice how he takes away freedom of choice from his own members when he requires that Oathkeeper leaders "perform their duty."  A voluntary, non-government organization that espouses freedom has no requirements. 

If we allow this kind of craziness to continue then we are only proving that the terrorist won!  The terrorist win every time we give in to this fear!  Because of fear based cowardly reactions like this we get to be groped by the TSA, have the NSA spy on our phone calls and emails, and etc....

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is stupid.

What next, we arm the kid working the drive-thru at McDonalds!

In case no one has noticed, the Oathkeepers are starting to look more and more like Stewart Rhodes private army.

Notice how he takes away freedom of choice from his own members when he requires that Oathkeeper leaders "perform their duty."  A voluntary, non-government organization that espouses freedom has no requirements. 

If we allow this kind of craziness to continue then we are only proving that the terrorist won!  The terrorist win every time we give in to this fear!  Because of fear based cowardly reactions like this we get to be groped by the TSA, have the NSA spy on our phone calls and emails, and etc....

 

It seems to me that the one time the government really should act, which action to me, is they should allow the recruiters at the stations be armed, they are doing nothing about it. There have been other threats made, too.  The Oath Keepers are stepping in to highlight their lack of response and ridiculous stance that servicemen shouldn't be armed in this case. These are not fear based reactions, they are logical reactions. And this is not what got us the TSA or NSA, it's the corrupt government officials who want to take us into a dictaorship with Marxism as it's underpinning. Obama is a Marxist.

 I'd like to know when Marxism ever succeeded and under that type of rule had a population that had any rights. Communism and even socialism won't work except in very small groups. When there are millions it will not work and has failed miserably in every single case. Personally, I don't want to be an unidentifiable silhouette wandering in a sea of grey because when we are all the same, that is exactly what it amounts to. There's no motivation to create because there is no reward. Crony Capitalism is what has ruined nations as well and is ruining this country as I type this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to me that the one time the government really should act, which action to me, is they should allow the recruiters at the stations be armed, they are doing nothing about it. There have been other threats made, too.  The Oath Keepers are stepping in to highlight their lack of response and ridiculous stance that servicemen shouldn't be armed in this case. These are not fear based reactions, they are logical reactions. And this is not what got us the TSA or NSA, it's the corrupt government officials who want to take us into a dictaorship with Marxism as it's underpinning. Obama is a Marxist.

 I'd like to know when Marxism ever succeeded and under that type of rule had a population that had any rights. Communism and even socialism won't work except in very small groups. When there are millions it will not work and has failed miserably in every single case. Personally, I don't want to be an unidentifiable silhouette wandering in a sea of grey because when we are all the same, that is exactly what it amounts to. There's no motivation to create because there is no reward. Crony Capitalism is what has ruined nations as well and is ruining this country as I type this.

One's political beliefs have nothing to do with this debate.

The issue here is the growth of the police state.

We have had many, many terrorists attacks, gang attacks, mass shootings, and etc... throughout U.S. history, but only now do we hear the call to arm more and more government functionaries!  This is clear evidence that too many U.S. citizens have so given in to fear and paranoia that they may as well be declared unfit to govern themselves.  Those who give up their freedoms for the illusion of safety deserve neither freedom or safety. (I can't remember who said that but it's a quote.)

This is how the police state grows!  This is how we ended up with the TSA!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One's political beliefs have nothing to do with this debate.

The issue here is the growth of the police state.

We have had many, many terrorists attacks, gang attacks, mass shootings, and etc... throughout U.S. history, but only now do we hear the call to arm more and more government functionaries!  This is clear evidence that too many U.S. citizens have so given in to fear and paranoia that they may as well be declared unfit to govern themselves.  Those who give up their freedoms for the illusion of safety deserve neither freedom or safety. (I can't remember who said that but it's a quote.)

This is how the police state grows!  This is how we ended up with the TSA!

I have no idea what your point is because our servicemen and women are already trained and issued weapons. All I want is for them to have the right to take them to work with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Soldiers do not need to get weapons from the armory every day when working on base which has security checkpoints and patrolling police (MP), besides that would waste hours of time everyday issuing and returning weapons for an entire unit.

If we arm recruiting stations simply on the fear induced idea that it will make them safer, then when does it stop?  Next we will need to arm the people working at the DMV, then the county clerk, then the Postal employees.

Eventually we end up with every government office armed to the teeth. 

Also, anyone who is worried about Jade Helm should be against this, seeing as how people have been up in arms over a training exercise, but don't even bat an eye when a private army deploys around the country overnight.

 

They are already armed to the teeth. Did you not hear about the IRS's shotguns, the social security administration and the billions of bullets bought by DHS? Hollow points no less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

However, are IRS agents going to work armed?  Is DHS issuing those hollow points to employees in the field?

Having weapons and ammo in an armory, locked up, is a lot different than having them on the street.

How would they work armed? Well not all of the sit behind a desk all day, some of them go out in the field and take people's property and things like that. I think you should look up the DHS and their 4 BILLION bullets they purchased along with even more. 

Yes indeed, weapons that are locked up are pretty darned useless aren't they?  If someone threatened to attack my workplace and I had to go there every day, I would be doing something to secure my own safety, not sit there and be a target. But, hey, I want to live.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“CLOSE THE BLINDS” for Protection"

"We have just confirmed here at FOX from the Pentagon, that the head of the US Northern Command has now issued a directive to authorize recruiters not to be able to carry weapons at the centers but he wants them to implement new security measures like “closing the blinds at the office.”

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/07/breaking-pentagon-tells-military-recruiters-no-guns-allowed-at-centers-close-the-blinds-for-safety-video/

:picard-facepalm:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My opinion only: All military personal who are on duty whether out in the field,
on their base, or even working in an office such as a recruiting center should
be allowed to carry a sidearm. Active soldiers should be allowed to carry 24/7.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is stupid.

What next, we arm the kid working the drive-thru at McDonalds!

In case no one has noticed, the Oathkeepers are starting to look more and more like Stewart Rhodes private army.

Notice how he takes away freedom of choice from his own members when he requires that Oathkeeper leaders "perform their duty."  A voluntary, non-government organization that espouses freedom has no requirements. 

If we allow this kind of craziness to continue then we are only proving that the terrorist won!  The terrorist win every time we give in to this fear!  Because of fear based cowardly reactions like this we get to be groped by the TSA, have the NSA spy on our phone calls and emails, and etc....

 

Stuart Rhoades is being called out for his leadership, Oathkeepers want Charles Dyer as the Leader, we may see a portion of oathkeepers splinter off if the movement keeps up. - So be it

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One's political beliefs have nothing to do with this debate.

The issue here is the growth of the police state.

We have had many, many terrorists attacks, gang attacks, mass shootings, and etc... throughout U.S. history, but only now do we hear the call to arm more and more government functionaries!  This is clear evidence that too many U.S. citizens have so given in to fear and paranoia that they may as well be declared unfit to govern themselves.  Those who give up their freedoms for the illusion of safety deserve neither freedom or safety. (I can't remember who said that but it's a quote.)

This is how the police state grows!  This is how we ended up with the TSA!

Let me help you out with that quote:

One of America’s favorite liberal phrases has been sent through the political spin machine and polished into a Frankenstein of sorts, thus rendering it inaccurate and far from its original intention. You might have heard that American founding father Benjamin Franklin said something like “Those who give up liberty for security deserve neither.”

The quote has been the siren song of anti-war protesters and, most recently, the banner for mass online protests against the NSA’s surveillance program.

As the Brookings Institute’s Benjamin Wittes observes, “Very few people who quote these words, however, have any idea where they come from or what Franklin was really saying when he wrote them.”

Despite its many (many) variations, this is the actual quote:

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

According to Wittes, the words appear in a letter widely presumed to be written by Franklin in 1755 on behalf of the Pennsylvania Assembly to the colonial governor. “The letter was a salvo in a power struggle between the governor and the assembly over funding for security on the frontier, one in which the assembly wished to tax the lands of the Penn family,” he explains.

The letter wasn’t about liberty but about taxes and the ability to “raise money for defense against French and Indian attacks. The governor kept vetoing the assembly’s efforts at the behest of the family, which had appointed him.”

Indeed, if you look at the text surrounding the famous quote, it’s pretty clearly about money: “Our assemblies have of late had so many supply bill, and of such different kinds, rejected, on various pretences,” wrote Franklin.

There’s not much on liberty, as we understand the concept, in the entire letter.

How Did It Get Butchered? To Google Ngram!

Thanks to the magic of Google’s Ngram viewer, we can get a historical peek at how it got molded for PR purposes. Google’s Ngram scans historical texts and lets users see how words change over time.

Screen Shot 2014-02-13 at 12.16.50 PM

 

Screen Shot 2014-02-13 at 12.25.20 PM

As we can see from the two chart above, Franklin’s quote didn’t mean much for 150 years after it was uttered, then had a solid and steady uptick around the later half of the 20th century, when fear of big brother began to mount (the top chart represents the frequency of the quote in books from 1750-present, the bottom from 1950-present).

In the few 19th-century books the quote does appear in, it doesn’t appear to be taken out of context, such as in the 1865 epic retelling of “The Life Of Joseph Warren,” where it is quoted in full with delicious servings of context.

But 19th-century authors weren’t always so committed to fidelity of the quote itself. In 1851, in a History of All Nations, the author wrote it in more of the modern form, “they who can give up liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

It wasn’t until the turn of the century did the butchering for ideological purposes begin. For instance, it was taken out of context in a book that is one of the closest things libertarians have to a bible, Frederick Hyak’s Road To Serfdom (1944), where Franklin’s quote concludes a chapter on the magnificence of the free market.

The banner anti-security quotes continue throughout the century in government reports on limited government and early apocalyptic warnings about the security state.

Misquoting folks isn’t new. It arises from the need to push an idea rather than investigate truth; it’s no shocker, then, that campaigns and ideological works have been the culprits of butchering Franklin’s words.

There’s even an academic term for the strategy, explains Matthew McGlone of the University of Texas at Austin — “contextomy.”

“‘Contextomy’ refers to the selective excerpting of words from their original linguistic context in a way that distorts the source’s intended meaning, a practice commonly referred to as ‘quoting out of context’. Contextomy is employed in contemporary mass media to promote products, defame public figures and misappropriate rhetoric. A contextomized quotation not only prompts audiences to form a false impression of the source’s intentions, but can contaminate subsequent interpretation of the quote when it is restored to its original context. …”

That’s about right.

http://techcrunch.com/2014/02/14/how-the-world-butchered-benjamin-franklins-quote-on-liberty-vs-security/

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good work. I also noticed that the Pentagon has ordered recruiters not to wear their uniforms while working. Ok, the Tennessee shooter would not have been deterred by then being in civilian clothing, as he likely couldn't see that clearly through the reflective windows, from his CAR. Now, since they've put out in the news that the recruiters wll NOT be in uniform, they will simply spray the windows & doors Again, knowing that during operating hours, right? No deterrent whatsoever.

I've also noticed that anyone supporting our troops, or our country, it seems, are stupid. Yet any Muslim in the country is simply misunderstood, couldn't possibly be as bad as a white supremacist terrorist. :lulz1: /Sarc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Restore formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.