Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
AnonG

Earth’s Moon: A Perfect Artificial Construction Too Good To Be True??

6 posts in this topic

 

 

(N.Morgan) We’ve seen recent theories that the moon isn’t real, but an artificially created by left over space debris from Earth.

This theory is proven incorrect in light of the current theory of gravity, indicating that a large objectcollects all loose material, leaving none for the formation of another large body. 

So far, none of the theories are particularly compelling due to the lack of evidence that neither Earth nor the Moon appear to have been physically altered by a close encounter that occurred in the distant past.

No debris in space indicate a collision in the past yet it seems that the Earth and Moon were developed during the same period.

 

More http://beforeitsnews.com/beyond-science/2015/05/earths-moon-a-perfect-artificial-construction-too-good-to-be-true-video-2449212.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Science has said that the moon is at least eight hundred thousand years
older than the earth, and maybe even a bit more.

edit to add: Facts about the moon - Maybe even older than the Earth or the
Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old; moon
rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were
resting was at least another billion years older.

Edited by Cryptic Mole

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Science has said that the moon is at least eight hundred thousand years
older than the earth, and maybe even a bit more.

edit to add: Facts about the moon - Maybe even older than the Earth or the
Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old; moon
rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were
resting was at least another billion years older.

​Who, exactly is "Science"?  Frasier Cain (http://www.universetoday.com/19599/age-of-the-moon/),  Charles Q. Choi (http://www.space.com/25331-moon-age-revealed-lunar-mystery.html), Jane J. Lee (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/04/140402-moon-formation-earth-age-space-science/), and an awful lot of astrophysicists disagree with "Science"!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

​Who, exactly is "Science"?  Frasier Cain (http://www.universetoday.com/19599/age-of-the-moon/),  Charles Q. Choi (http://www.space.com/25331-moon-age-revealed-lunar-mystery.html), Jane J. Lee (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/04/140402-moon-formation-earth-age-space-science/), and an awful lot of astrophysicists disagree with "Science"!

​Well unfortunately there's no way to prove or disprove any of it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Restore formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.