Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

CRAPPY ANNIVERSARY: Did We Walk on the Moon 47 Years Ago with 1960’s Technology? (VIDEO)

4 posts in this topic

Life is not so much a battle between right and wrong, as it is a battle between Truth and Lies, as this generally precedes, and ultimately leads to good or evil. Truth leads to good. Lies lead to evil. Life is wonderfully simple.

The simple fact is, half of all crimes are “conspiracies”. Half are done without forethought, in the heat of the emotion of the moment, and half are plotted out in advance, thus making them conspiracies. Those who would like the public to ignore half of all the crimes in the world by ridiculing those with an intellect to perceive such duplicity are simply those perpetrating the crimes in the first place.

We have to understand that if a tiny spider, the size of a dime, can meticulously plan and trap its prey weeks in advance, than the human mind, if so inclined to evil, can do so much more evil, much farther in advance. Additionally, a lie, or a conspiracy, is the only crime that can exist without tangible evidence. If someone is murdered, there is dead body. If someone steals, there is the material possession. Yet, when someone lies, where is the lie? A lie is the only crime that you cannot touch, that you cannot see. A lie is purely ethereal. This is why lies are the favorite misdeeds of habitual criminals. After all, out of all of the crimes committed in the world which people are put in prison for, how many of them are there for simply lying?

The origin of crime is the lie, or conspiracy, invented beforehand to cover up the crime before it is even committed. When crimes are committed on an international scale, then international lies are needed. This is why multibillion dollar corporations have consolidated all television networks, magazines, and newspapers. It is to control your perception of reality, not to offer you reality. As someone who worked as senior editor in news for two years, I can testify to this fact. We referred to our broadcast as a “show”, not “news”, simply because it was completely contrived from the top down like any corporation, where the “anchors” (readers) simply regurgitated the scripted words from unseen superiors. Don’t believe me? Simply watch the clip below and notice that all the major networks are receiving commands from a central authority.


3 people like this

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we did, maybe we did not.

I would however imagine that if we could have done that in 1960 and with the general progression rate the same as other technologies, we should have had regular daily flights to the moon.

Something happened or something is preventing us from going back (that is if we did land thee - which becomes a big can of worms)

We know by now that National Space Agency is synonymous with skulduggery but, there id very little ABSOLUTE proof beyond a shadow (pun intended) of doubt that it was faked.  But the believability takes a big fat knock if one really mull over the issues logically.  Why never go back despite all the modern tech that could make it a thousand times easier and safer than in 1960?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

47 years ago - and people still believe in it.

For many, the fake moon landings constitute one of the hardest facts to accept. If you believe NASA landed on the moon, it’s time for you to question your indoctrination – the American moon landings were 100% FAKE – the government (and every other government), along with its media and academia sold you a BIG f****** lie and you believed it.


I’m truly sorry if it injures your cherished beliefs but don’t fret too much as we all believed it at one time. It’s normal to assume that your government loves you and is the repository of truth. It’s normal to assume that astronomers, engineers, and physics majors at universities, etc. would have had enough independently-minded brains to come out and uncover the fraud. It’s normal to assume that CNN and the media would have had a big breaking stories about the fake moon landings. Unfortunately, your assumptions were entirely wrong.

Normally, I leave open the possibility of human error and avoid absolute certainties but with respect to the moon landings, we are 100% positive that the moon landings were all fake and it’s time the rest of the world knew. It’s not difficult to prove the fakery as you only need a critical mind and common sense.

Yes, we have all heard the “debunking” claims that the conspiracy would have had to have been too big to conceal it, that the moon landings were monitored by Ham radio operators, we can bounce lasers off of the moon, or we have pictures of the landing sites. I’m here to tell you that these so-called proofs are utter nonsense.

Human beings must become more than mere parrots of official stories. You owe it to yourself to read through these proofs and to do your own research. Even the media is starting to recognize that the moon landings were faked. However, once you come to the realization that the moon landings were faked, there are a few inescapable conclusions you must reach:

  • NASA has perpetrated a tremendous fraud on the world and cannot be trusted; all NASA missions should be presumed fraudulent unless proven otherwise with overwhelming evidence
  • There will not be a Mars landing anytime soon and it’s right to assume that there’s no rover on Mars at this time
  • All first and second world countries failed to reveal the big lie and are controlled in some manner; all other lunar landings by China, Japan, Russia, etc. are also likely fraudul
  • There was no big space race between the Americans and the Russians – it was fake; international relations are not what you think they are
  • The media cannot be trusted as they only repeat the patent lies of NASA
  • Big universities, professors, astrophysicists, engineers, etc. all failed to uncover the OBVIOUSLY faked moon landings; they’re either controlled directly or indirectly through conformity
  • Space X has failed to reveal the fake moon landings and speaks of a Mars mission; Space X is also likely fraudulent

(1) a ridiculous papier-mâché Lunar Lander complete with black paper, tape, gold aluminum foil, and curtain rods, that (i) achieved speeds up to 4,000 mph on descent and ascent; (ii) was NEVER tested or flown on earth; (iii) had an inexplicable ability to maintain life support (with ample room) for several days (the Apollo 17 astronauts were supposedly on the moon for 3 days, 2 hours, 59 minutes and 40 seconds); (iv) could absorb substantial amounts of dust inside the pressurized cabin without a problem (the two Apollo 17 astronauts re-entered the Lunar Lander on three occasions after even driving a dune buggy around the surface); (v) remarkably lacked all traces of dust on the landing pads; (vi) had enough room to hitch on a fold-up dune buggy on later flights along with extra 1960’s batteries and tires; (vii) the ascent engine had NEVER been tested – not even turned on to see if it works; (viii) included one miraculous air conditioning system in the harshest environment imaginable [the temperature on the moon varies from -387 Fahrenheit (-233 Celsius), at night, to 253 Fahrenheit (123 Celsius) during the day]; (ix) the astronauts were able to land this contraption without widows; and (x) NASA risked the huge possibility that the astronauts would accidentally land on a big rock (look how far off the ground the rocket nozzle is) or crater and cause the Lunar Lander to crumble on impact.

(2) no blast crater or scorching caused from the Lunar Lander’s 10,000 lb. thruster;

(3) the craft, the Apollo suits, and cameras had no protection from radiation, micrometeorites, and the other elements on the moon and in space including immediate temperature fluctuations of 540 degrees Fahrenheit while in and out of the shade;

(4) a VERY long series of photo fakery and patent proofs of photo editing, e.g., the Michael Collins faked spacewalk photo (for starters, review the photo analyses of Jack White – http://www.aulis.com/jackstudies_index1.html;

(5) many examples of astronauts suspended by wires;

(6) everything was in slow motion, yet everything should have moved quicker;

(7) use of 1960s movie technology, i.e., artificial backdrops (visible scotchlite glass screen) with visible lines;

(8) thousands of beautiful studio qualify photos without the ability to manually adjust aperture, use the viewfinder, etc. and without secondary light sources;

(9) no picture of the stars – ever, even when the astronauts were supposedly orbiting on the dark side of the moon and using long exposure times;

(10) proof of secondary light sources and major shadow discrepancies, including a 130 degrees shadow direction shift over a small area that is clearly not perspective;

(11) the ridiculous Lunar Rover – do you really believe NASA would have risked attaching a dune buggy on the Lunar Lander or the possibility that it would break down far away from the Lander or cause a part to shake loose on one of the astronaut’s suit due to the rover hitting a large bump or crashing (think about this one);

(12) using circular windows to fake an unremarkable image of the earth, with a cloud that spans the entire diameter of the earth;

(13) no one has allegedly been beyond 400 miles above the earth for nearly 42 years (last time on the moon was December 14, 1972) and yet were able to do it easily in 1969 and travel a minimum of 234,000 miles to the moon;

(14) the astronauts sat on top of a 10,000 lb. thruster but noise was not an issue in the recordings;

(15) a disappearing Lunar Lander on the moon in the photos and repeated use of similar mountain backdrops in what should have been different areas;

(16) strange and nonexistent tracks of the Lunar Rover; also, Lunar Rover tracks appear before the Lunar Rover was even unpackaged;

(17) the sun appears to be a giant light bulb;

(18) American patriotic symbols – always perfect in the photographs;

(19) remarkable boot prints with no moisture;

(20) the film of the ascension stage of the Lunar Lander – laughable footage filmed by the astronaut who stayed behind to watch and who idiotically panned out and up (of course NASA claims it did it by remote 234,000 miles away) and then beamed the footage back to earth – and we didn’t even have decent television remotes at that time;

(21) the Command Module orbits a fake moon;

(22) the billowing American flag – oops;

(23) the 200 yard touchdown pass – wait how come we didn’t see that or other great feats?;

(24) the Van Allen Radiation Belts and other alleged severe cosmic radiation;

(25) the first moonwalkers’ press conference – the unwilling liars’ affair;

(26) the video footage of the docking Lunar Lander appears eerily similar and fake as Kubrick’s “2001: A Space Odyssey”;

(27) the discrepancies of the moonwalkers, did they see stars or not?;

(28) an ISS astronaut said that NASA cannot go beyond Earth’s orbit;

(29) perfect performing 1960s technology that cannot be matched today;

(30) the “spectacular” photos of the landing sites on the moon … wait a second they are awful and show nothing;

(31) NASA lost much of the footage, diagrams, etc.;

(32) the Lunar Rover was nothing more than a radio controlled dune buggy;

(33) the moon rock that became petrified wood and the fact that von Braun just happened to take a trip to Antarctica with NASA’s management shortly before the Apollo moon landing missions, which is the same very place where moon rocks can be found on earth;

(34) third party stage hands appearing on video when there should only be two astronauts;

(35) the inadequate space and impossibility for three astronauts to live for approximately 12 days in space in a tiny craft while stuck only in a sitting position;

(36) the gray color of the soil on the moon is the wrong color;

(37) impossibly quick answers between those supposedly on the moon and NASA (timing delay off);

(38) the earth is pictured too small from the moon (the earth would be 4x the diameter of the moon);

(39) the unreasonable jump to landing on the moon and alleged jumps in technology in a span of only 11 years;

(40) the Command Module did not have enough fuel to make it to the moon and back since the gravitational pull of the earth allegedly extends all the way to the moon;

(41) the Apollo astronauts’ suits were clearly not pressurized – they should have looked like the Michelin Man; also, one of the astronauts appears to even have a bare hand during one video segment;

(42) the minerals kicked up by the European Space Agency’s SMART-1 probe were mistakenly different than the Apollo rocks;

(43) 60% of the much simpler Lunar Lander testing vehicles crashed (supposedly used by the astronauts to prepare for actually landing the real Lunar Lander) – do you think Armstrong would have been ready to fly an untested and never flown Lunar Lander on the moon after this?;

(44) Von Braun said in his book ‘”Conquest To The Moon” (published in 1953) that it would be impossible to send anyone to the moon because of the sheer size of craft needed to do the trip; taking Von Braun’s calculations into consideration, a spaceship that needed to travel that distance would have had to be 266 times bigger than the Saturn 5;

(45) the broken strut on the Lunar Lander;

(46) the lunar soil in the Apollo pictures is nothing more than Portland cement;

(47) leaked video of the Apollo astronauts on a studio set that looks exactly like the moon (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNxxzEIzDVU) and a leaked photo of Wernher von Braun Strolling on the set of the moon (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_kVl4BIFYU);

(48) you cannot hear sound in a vacuum and yet sounds were clearly recorded on video while the astronauts were allegedly working on the moon;

(49) a third person is seen outside the command module which is supposed to be in space (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inq72hrDac0);

(50) NASA has now admitted that the Van Allen Radiation Belts (“an area of dangerous radiation”), prevent human travel: “Radiation like this can harm the guidance systems, onboard computers, or other electronics on Orion . . . Naturally, we have to pass through this dangerous zone [Van Allen Radiation Belts] twice – once up and once back . . . Sensors aboard will record radiation levels for scientists to study. We must solve these challenges before we put people through this region of space”; and,

(51) The best alleged “proofs” that NASA made it to the moon – the moon reflectors (proof of nothing, which would be covered in dust by now anyway), the landing site photos, (a laughable and PhotoShop joke), the testimonies (varying and peculiar), moon rocks (which are unaccounted for and can be found on earth and sometimes turn into petrified wood), the moon/hammer experiment (possibly faked with wires and impossible with the pressurized suit to hold the feather with finger tips), and the ham radio operators (how did they know the transmission came from the surface of the moon and not just a supposed satellite, assuming they weren’t paid shills) – is this really the best NASA could think of to prove such a historic event?



2 people like this

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Restore formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.