Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
counterintelligence

Anna von Reitz: Notice to Congress: The Days of Legalizing of Theft is Over

27 posts in this topic

http://anationbeguiled.com/?p=11434

Or at least download the PDF from her site for safe keeping:

http://www.annavonreitz.com/noticetocongress.pdf

I'm not so sure about the advice of the oxymoronic UN Resolutions, but gander at just getting back to our Constitution the way the Founding Fathers intended it.  We have unalienable rights amonst them the right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.  That means that they can't put a lien against us to pay off their debts.  We didn't incur this debt, the government did.  As a matter of fact, the government went out of existence, but in order to stay alive, they placed it on us.  So much for this "modern" idea of placing debt on our kids and grandkids, it was already present on our fathers and grandfathers. 

So is the attacks on 9/11 stemming from something such as the Vatican that wants us to all remain in debt and never recover, when we were declared sureties back in 1933, when all we had to fear was fear itself?  I've read that the New Deal was not what brought us out of the Depression, rather other things going on behind the scenes.  Did our economic balance teeter totter in the economic centers of the world, and by taking them down, nobody would come out of it alive?  Was Obama put into place out of the ashes amonst his brotherhood, to reach caliphate by destroying the infidels, to promise hope and change, and further destruction?  Has this been a long time coming since 1933 or even 1861?  What's the rationale of making all of us pay for our leaders mistakes while they continue to profit?  The charge of inditement would be fiduciary trust fraud.  They should be behind bars.  Recent banking laws have reflected that your contributions to their bank account, (putting their money in their banks) is an unsecured loan against the bank going under and taking your money to pay off their debts. 

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is what Anna recommends via http://anationbeguiled.com/?p=12247

By the Political Will of We THE People we hereby claim the following:

Revocation of all the unconstitutional acts, treaties, proclamations, etc. since March 27 1861, 

The law of the land is Geneva & King James Bible, Common Law, Articles of Confederation, the Organic Constitution of 1789, the Bill of Rights of 1791 and Northwest Ordinance.  These laws apply to all 50 Nation States.

US Corporation is Confined to the geographical area called the District of Columbia, The US Corporation is physically bound to White House = CEO office and Capital Building = Board of Directors office.

The US Corporation has NO authority over the people or lands of the United States of America and the people or land of the District of Columbia.

Revocation of all adhesion contracts by US Corporation due to their fraudulent actions against the people. 

The IRS and Federal Reverse are associated with US Corporation and IMF which have no authority to operate on the lands of the United States of America.

The De Jure Constitutional Government declares Martial law over the US Corporation and the land known as Washington DC.  Washington DC will be patrolled by the United States Military and Militias of the states assigned to do so.

We THE People will consider criminal charges against all the actors, agents and their supporting staff as far back as necessary …

It is the Political Will of We THE People~

Notice to Agent is notice to Principal

Notice to Principal is notice to Agent

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Original Jurisdiction of the United States Constitution 1789, Bill of Rights 1791 with the original 13th Amendment=”which removes persons who have accepted an entitlement from holding public office”.

Of course, what followed was the 14th Amendment which allowed corporations to have more say than We the People, and written by corrupt railroad attorneys. 

On April 15, 1861, President Lincoln executed the first executive order written by any President, Executive Order 1, Executive Orders are not constitutional however it is perceived as law by the use of television propagating the deception.  This is not correct; an Executive Order is the memo method of communicating between departments of a corporation and is not the law of the land.

When Congress eventually did reconvene, it was reconvened under the military authority of the Commander-in-Chief and not by Rules of Order for Parliamentary bodies or by Constitutional Law; placing the American people under martial rule ever since that national emergency declared by President Lincoln.

So when Obama declares Martial Law, what will he be declaring it against?  We have been under the UN's authority since then, so he's going to place us under something we are already under? 

Currency collapse?  Really?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all so much easier to break the law when you're part of the corporation versus being part of the government. 

The fact that Obama is making this look like this is taking place now, instead of finding out that it already occurred a long time ago, is strange to what is actually taking place.  So what have they come up with that's not already in place?  They must be trying to make Obama look dumb, when in fact they are making fools out of all of us. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Consider this,

Governments that allow a flood of illegal immigrants to not only invade, but take advantage of social assistance programs literally stealing resources and services from the citizens that paid for them.

Service theft seems to be an understatement when you think of the billions stolen every year.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beginning with the 13th Amendment being rewritten, followed with the 14th Amendment, and then everyone was allowed to vote with the 15th Amendment (where it was previously just land owners), then came along the 16th Amendment (which was in between the time of Martial Law being declared under Lincoln in 1861, and USA, Inc. in 1933).  So from the 13th Amendment on, the corruption persisted.  Voter fraud is a violation of the 12th Amendment, in which the voters were limited until the 15th Amendment.  Possibly the violations of the 12th Amendment and the 15th Amendment coincide each other. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Team Uzi said:

Consider this,

Governments that allow a flood of illegal immigrants to not only invade, but take advantage of social assistance programs literally stealing resources and services from the citizens that paid for them.

Service theft seems to be an understatement when you think of the billions stolen every year.

The USA, Inc. would be handing over USA to illegal immigrants.  But since the illegal immigrants are from the same foreign occupation that USA, Inc. does it still doesn't give them any more right to do that.  USA, Inc. already has probate officers that produce your birth certificate, in order to state that your citizenship in USA is dead, since USA is dead, you are a member of the British Crown, with USA, Inc.  USA, Inc. allowed the British Crown to get their status as a world power back.  USA Inc. can claim that your investments in their bank, only belong to USA, Inc., not Mr. or Mrs. De Jure USA citizen.  USA, Inc. was also trying to take landowners of USA, the Bundy bunch, which is also illegal for them to do.  There is also a logisitical problem with the fact that USA, Inc. has declared nothing in USA exists, but can take anything they want or give anything they want, or trade therein anything that has to do with USA.  Obama is most likely acting perfectly according to USA, Inc., but not to USA.  Obama will not be required to produce a birth certificate, because his origins are not allowed to be known, but yet more or less vested with USA, Inc. even though in violation of USA.  Obama's arrogance stems from the fact that I have to be president before you can know who I am?  Doesn't everyone know how I am?  Nobody from any common place will claim that they even brushed into him on a sidewalk anywhere.  Anna does go on about this in her documents on her main page at http://www.annavonreitz.com concerning the Poop and how he isn't even an imposter to their way of thinking.  Anna would probably content that since the legalized theft already took place before the illegal immigrants got here/were allowed here, it's not of their concern. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These people are still officials of the Federal United States even though they have
promoted fraud against Americans and the American States.

The Foreign Sovereigns Immunity Act and the Internatonal Organizations Immunity Act both made this
point circa 1976. They are not “your” Governors, “your” Legislators, or “your” members of Congress.
They have explicitly, on-the-record, made it crystal clear that they are operating entirely in the
international jurisdiction of the sea and have nothing to do with the land jurisdiction and the state
offices that you are owed—–and. more to the point— the offices which you owe yourself.

That the Pan American treaty of 12-26-1933 (49 STAT 3097) Treaty Series 881 – (Convention on Rights and Duties of States) stated CONGRESS replaced STATUTES with international law, placing all states under international law.

That the International Organization Immunities Act of 12-9-1945 – – Congress relinquished every public office over to the UN. Local governments up to the president fall under UN jurisdiction. Congress gave the UN the right to dictate what laws will be international & gave them the right to tax the States.

Furthermore, The POPE on July 11 and effective September 1, 2013 issued a APOSTOLIC LETTER ISSUED MOTU PROPRIO OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF FRANCIS ON THE JURISDICTION OF THE JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES OF VATICAN CITY STATE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS. 

Pope Francis Apostolic Letter effectively stripped away the immunity of all judges, attorneys, government officials and all entities established under the Roman Curia.  Since “All” corporations are established under the Roman Curia they have their immunity stripped away including their C level, Executive level, Office of General Council, and significant operational staff.

All of these “persons” can be held accountable for war crimes, crimes against humanity, for the unlawful restrictions of the liberties of the divine spirit incarnate; for failure to settle the accounts; for continued prosecution of claims already settled, etc. Definition: Divine Spirit is humanity.

(Everytime the Poop does something it's always ironic or profund depending). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a sentence in English class that read like this:

The Lincoln Memorial was built to honor a great president who was assassinated as a token of the nation's esteem.

Was this sentence a misplaced modifier?  Does it not read as intended?

Looking back at what Lincoln did, he is the reason why under Martial Law that the Commander in Thief came about.  This probably explains the conditions of what brought about his assassination. 

On March 27, 1861, seven (7) southern states walked out of the Union along with several of the northern states under ”Sine Die” breaking the contract between the Federation and Union States. The states seceding from the Union were South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and Texas.

This event caused the contract which consisted of the Articles of Confederation, the Organic Constitution of 1789 and the Bill of Rights of 1791 to be breached. 

Upon breaking this contract, the following happened: The Union of States relationship was suspended and the United States of America was suspended in its existence.

 Article I – Legislation was suspended; Under Parliament Congress, Congress ceased to exist as a lawful body and all lawful Republic governmental Seats were vacant*

Article II – Executive branch was suspended; Office of President was suspended – Office of the President was vacant* (President had no authority to declare war). At this point, the then sitting President had no power, no authority, his position as president was suspended and considered vacant by the De Jure Republic Constitutional Government.

Article III – Judicial Courts were suspended; Article III Judicial seats are vacated.*

* = per Administrative Court Judge in a North Carolina case FILE NO. : 11 CVS 1559

On April 17, 1861 and over the next five (5) weeks – seceding from the Union were the additional states of Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee and Arkansas totaling eleven (11) confederate states.

Not to mention states that hadn't joined the Union yet.  Most states would've joined the Union by 1933, only to be part of the corporation, not De Jure USA. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Restore formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.