Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

CTHunter!

 Member
  • Content count

    323
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

15 Good

About CTHunter!

  • Rank
    Addict
  • Birthday
  1. Well, I do recall one night when having left the chat on I returned latter only to see those in it referring to black people as monkeys. In any case, I like honest work even if I'm not well off because of it. I'll take my outdoorsy job over an indoor desk/typing one any day and if I were ever to go out into the streets it would be because I want to not because someone else wants me to. I've been a real stickler about surveillance though so I passed on events where I live with the understanding that I would just be tagged and monitored for it. I'm aware just being in any of these forums carries the same risk, and it was only for good reasons that I took it. But being in a risk-prone environment doesn't excuse libel and I will rightfully defend myself from it.
  2. I haven't looked back at the pages to check, but I believe I may have said something along the lines that I wanted to see what initiative you guys would take. It shouldn't be up to me to do all the work for you and it's reasonable to have some expectation that you would do some research or reading on your own. After all, many of you are frequently posting articles or videos that you do not comment on yourselves, leaving the reader to get into it without you reinventing the wheel. Likewise Sutton illustrated things as such that my explanations might pale in comparison or be otherwise redundant. Now the gist of it I did get to right away, so there's little point in repeatedly asking what is the point, it should be very clear to you. I did also make references to two important positions from his work regarding Modern Psychology and China which were glossed over, yet these are very relevant to things being discussed elsewhere on the forum, i.e. Tavistock and Clintons, because you are probably aware how the latter provided means for China to make gains at the US' expense. I was thinking of pulling up Sutton's reference to China but I wanted to, and still do, see if you had any initiative to pull it up first yourselves. I think the initiative point is important because it reflects drive and integrity. I've seen people argue that flat earth threads are justifiable in that very sense, to invigorate those to check their facts thoroughly even against obvious reality. If that's the case for a topic like that, why not those involving international politics and military industrial complexes? Now, being pressed that it's up to me to explain my views which I did, what exempts you from doing the same when accusing me of being a shill? I will say it again, if you have no proof or evidence, that is libel, which is legally actionable. There is no ambiguity over the nature of calling me that, it is defamatory. If I was just posting anonymously that would be one thing, but the accusations are thrown out at what is an identifiable account while simultaneously making references to other site accounts that you would have no awareness of without either someone from there telling you or you observing yourself, and that raises a lot of suspicion which I think the administrators of both here and there should account for. Don't be fooled by the levity of my avatar, I'm not playing games about this.
  3. I'll say it again, if you want to throw around accusations, show some proof. Otherwise, it's libel.
  4. Not that they should have the same view, but that there's no reference point to compare or critique mine if you have nothing to say on the material I cite. It's simple really. Sutton had good points to make that predate the CT realm as we know it today. The fact that he did it with academic scholasticism and without a lot of sensational, if not insane, fluff that characterizes a lot of CT at this point, reflect a standard I would hope to see among CTers who take themselves seriously. So if all you want to do is clown, fine, that'll be your legacy.
  5. You mean everything you and many of your fellow members posted in this thread? I guess that would be a good example of shillwork, taken out of your own threads discussing the topic. What exactly is it that you do for a living again?
  6. CTHunter! is a pun off of the anime City Hunter which my avatar pic is from. I've made that clear earlier in the thread.
  7. Not really. I didn't waste as much time here as I could have so it's not a loss to me. I gave the place a chance, so you can't complain now.
  8. I didn't drum it up, you guys did. I was going to sit on my ass that night regardless.
  9. I described a brief position on page 1 and tried to go from there with details and evidence. If noone wants to consider those, then it's difficult to discuss my position further.
  10. I did try to do a logical and academic debate already. still am. You couldn't.
  11. Attitude is secondary if anything. You made an accusation, chose a worse way to stand by it, will do nothing to substantiate it. It reflects you, more important to you than me given it's your site the question is who wants to interact with you. I'm mostly hermit-like so it doesn't matter to me either way.
  12. I'll take it there is no evidence whatsoever and that I'll be sure to hear just more of the same indefinitely. Good going guys, way to undo your credibility for the one thread that made you useful.
  13. Sutton books are actually more prominently featured on right leaning online bookstores rather than left. Keep hurting your position some more. On a side note I very likely have a stronger background in 20th century action movies than you do but probably because I spend a lot less time doing this like this than you. And yet you call me a shill. Some more irony for you to think about.
  14. You're the one bearing false witness, throwing out false accusations, etc. Anonymity was concern enough for me to have nearly no interactive online activity for about 8 with a small exception circa 2009-10. I only came back online due to some loose ends from that period and before as well as other reasons in my life that would make it useful to leave something available to others. I used gmg for this purpose and could go quite into detail into the malfeasance on there, and that is why I originally supported the tavistock ops thread on here. I didn't expect people here to be as bad as those on gmg/glp though. My mistake? And no I have not deflected just because I don't answer bullshit questions on vegetables you probably don't eat and animes you don't watch ok? Now if you wanted to call me a troll instead of a shill, that could have been done much earlier without the shill label. The fact that the latter was thrown first and former not at all shows how kneejerk your reactions were and how much your intention was to discredit towards your own gain. Even if I went into detail on Sutton you'd find reason to continue with your witch hunt. Why don't you read the chapter on Skull and Bones and the foundation of modern psychology and try and tell me again how irrelevant that is, especially given people's interest in tavistock. Or maybe the passage regarding China whereby Sutton foretold the situation 30+ years ahead and after he died. I'm still giving you a chance here on the benefit of the doubt that you're merely ignorant rather than malicious, but go ahead and shoot yourself in the foot some more.
  15. I think I do have less time than you do. I would also think shills would approach any of those topics just as much as non-shills, you throwing them out there as bait doesn't make a difference either way. Rather than ask for my views as evidence for anything, you or I could be more direct and regard anything about me personally. Again, it wouldn't be hard at all to demonstrate you wrong as long as it costs my anonymity and privacy. Do all unfamiliar posters get the same treatment? Anylike, likewise if you feel you have any information about me personally at all that corroborates your accusations, feel free to bring it forward. Otherwise, this clearly looks like a witch hunt. For all your fluster on me not talking to you the way you want, what about you ignoring questions regarding Sutton? Again, for shame, he sacrificed a career and possibly his life to give things you wouldn't have had otherwise. What are your sacrifices in comparison? Think about that irony.
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.